In:The Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and negotiating humor in everyday encounters
Edited by Villy Tsakona and Jan Chovanec
[Topics in Humor Research 7] 2018
► pp. 57–76
Chapter 3Discourse markers as guides to understanding spontaneous humor and irony
Published online: 5 January 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.7.03shi
https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.7.03shi
Abstract
The paper addresses the issue of categorizing and interpreting utterances as either serious or non-serious in spontaneous discourse. The research is based on real-life dialogues and samples of computer-mediated interactions in which discourse participants need to discuss the mode of communication due to unexpected insincerity, use of jokes, humorous or ironic remarks in otherwise earnest and sincere interactions. In this context, the aim of the paper is twofold: firstly, it shows how the mode of communication can be negotiated with the help of discourse markers and, secondly, it demonstrates multiple functions of these markers in dialogue. By explicating the speaker’s intention, these phrases guide the process of understanding and indicate how the meaning of the utterance can be integrated in discourse. Discourse markers can also function as signals of social meaning, for example, as signals of implicit conflict or competition.
Keywords: mode of discourse, sincerity, metadiscourse, humor, irony, discourse markers
Article outline
- 1.Negotiating the discourse mode
- 2.On the variety of modes of discourse: What makes them different?
- 3.Discussing the mode of discourse in spontaneous communication
- 4.Discourse markers as tools for the negotiation of the discourse mode
- 4.1Initiation of a specific mode of communication
- 4.2Negotiating the mode of discourse
- 4.3Putting the dialogue back on the serious track
- 5.Conclusions
Data sources References
References (30)
Medgorodok. Travmatologija i ortopedia. [URL]
Russian National Corpora (RNC). [URL]
The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). [URL]
The Corpus of Web-Based Global English (GloWbE). [URL]
Thoughts on Life and Love. [URL]
Aijmer, Karin & Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie. (2011). Pragmatic markers. In Jan Zienkowski, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (Eds.), Discursive pragmatics (pp. 223–247). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Coupland, Nikolas & Jaworski, Adam. (2004). Sociolinguistic perspectives on metalanguage: Reflexivity, evaluation and ideology. In Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland & Dariusz Galasiński (Eds.), Metalanguage. Social and ideological perspectives (pp. 15–51). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dynel, Marta. (2011). Joker in the pack. Towards determining the status of humorous framing in conversation. In Marta Dynel (Ed.), The pragmatics of humor across discourse domains (pp. 217–242). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fischer, Kerstin. (2006). Towards an understanding of the spectrum of approaches to discourse particles: Introduction to the volume. In Kerstin Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Fox, Kate. (2004). Watching the English. The hidden rules of English behavior. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Fraser, Bruce. (1996). Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics, 6(2), 167–190.
Kotthoff, Helga. (1999). Coherent keying in conversational humor: Contextualizing joint fictionalization. In Wolfram Bublitz, Uta Lenk & Eija Ventola (Eds.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 125–151). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Labov, William. (1974). The art of sounding and signifying. In W. Gage (Ed.), Language in its Social Setting (pp. 84–116). Washington, D.C.: Anthropological Society of Washington.
Narula, Uma. (2006). Handbook of communication models, perspectives, strategies. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers.
Norrick, Neal. (1993). Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Partington, Alan. (2006). The linguistics of laughter: A corpus-assisted study of laughter-talk. New York: Routledge.
Preston, Dennis. (2004). Folk metalanguage. In Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland & Dariusz Galasiński (Eds.), Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives (pp. 75–101). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2007). The sense of humor and the truth. In Willibald Ruch (Ed.), The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic (pp. 95–108). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor
Chovanec, Jan
2018. Irony as counter positioning. In The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 30], ► pp. 165 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
