Cover not available

In:The Power of Satire
Edited by Marijke Meijer Drees and Sonja de Leeuw
[Topics in Humor Research 2] 2015
► pp. 19–32

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Satire and dignity

Published online: 22 October 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.2.02kui
This chapter examines satire from the target’s point of view: how to respond to satire without losing dignity? The power of satire lies in its capacity to challenge dignity, which threatens social position, political legitimacy and individual well-being. Analysing concrete examples of satire, the essay reviews the merits, risks and limitations of possible responses: laugh, joke back, argue, retaliate, show anger, or withdraw. The capacity to respond with dignity is not distributed evenly: not everyone has the resources to do so. Moreover, there is not always consensus on what counts as a dignified response. In today’s increasingly diverse and globalised societies, this makes satire increasingly contested and risky, but also an increasingly important domain for intercultural encounters and negotiations.
References (24)
References
Andersen, Hans C. 2005. The Stories of Hans Christian Andersen: A New Translation from the Danish. Edited and Translated by Diana Crone Frank and Jeffrey Frank. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Nancy. 2009. “Responses to Failed Humor.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1825–1836. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 2005. Laughter and Ridicule. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brillenburg Wurth, Kiene. 2011. “Spitting Image and Pre-televisual Political Satire.” Image & Narrative 12(3): 13–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Condren, Conal. 2012. “Satire and Definition.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 25(4): 375–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Condren, Conal, Jessica Milner Davis, Sally McCausland and Robert Phiddian. 2008. “Defining Parody and Satire: Australian Copyright Law and Its New Exception, Part Two.” Media and Arts Law Review 13(4): 401–421.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Paolo. 2006. Silvio Berlusconi. Television, Power and Patrimony. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goatly, Andrew. 2012. Meaning and Humour. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, Jonathan. 2009. “Throwing Out the Welcome Mat: Public Figures as Guests and Victims in TV Satire.” In Satire TV, ed. by Gray et al. New York: NYU Press, 147–166.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, Jonathan, Jeffrey Jones and Ethan Thompson. 2009. Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-network era. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2010. “Jocular Mockery, (Dis)Affiliation and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(8): 2106–2119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer. 2001. “The Pragmatics of Humor Support.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 14(1): 55–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuipers, Giselinde. 2006. Good Humor, Bad Taste: A Sociology of the Joke. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “The Sociology of Humor.” In Primer of Humor Research, ed. by Victor Raskin, 365–402. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “The Politics of Humour in the Public Sphere: Cartoons, Power and Modernity in the First Transnational Humour Scandal.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 14(1): 63–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lockyer, Sharon and Michael Pickering (eds.). 2006. Beyond the Joke. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McAleer, Kevin. 1997. Dueling: The Cult of Honor in Fin-de-Siècle Germany. Princeton: Princeton UP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meijer Drees, Maaike and Ivo Nieuwenhuis. 2010. “De macht van satire: grenzen testen, grenzen stellen.” [The Power of Satire: Testing Boundaries, Setting Boundaries]. Nederlandse letterkunde 15: 193–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oring, Eliott. 2003. Engaging Humor. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Test, George. 1980. “The Roast: American Ritual Satire and Humor.” In Rituals and Ceremonies in Popular Culture, ed. by Ray B. Browne, 160–177. Bowling Green: Popular Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vaguelsy, Jean-Michel. 2006. Coluche roi de coeur. [Coluche King of Hearts]. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waters, Clare. 2011. “Being Berlusconi: Sabina Guzzanti’s Impersonation of the Italian Prime Minister Between Stage and Screen.” In Studies in Political Humour, ed. by Diana Popa and Villy Tsakona. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 167–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zajdman, Anat. 1995. “Humorous Face-threatening Acts: Humor as Strategy.” Journal of Pragmatics 23: 325–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Fatehi, Erfan, Juha Herkman, Joonas Koivukoski & Liisi Laineste
2025. National identity through the prism of satire: humor scandals in Estonia 1991–2022. Journal of Baltic Studies 56:4 ► pp. 705 ff. DOI logo
Shuman, Emily Q.
2025. Fantasies of power: sex, humour and complicities in French rap. Modern & Contemporary France 33:4 ► pp. 523 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Chuanhui, Yifan Wang, Yuchen Zhang, Houcai Wang & Yufei Pang
2025. Confront hate with AI: how AI-generated counter speech helps against hate speech on social Media?. Telematics and Informatics 101 ► pp. 102304 ff. DOI logo
Holm, Nicholas
2024. Humour versus dignity in the public sphere. The European Journal of Humour Research 12:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Kuipers, Giselinde & Dick Zijp
2024. Humour and the public sphere. The European Journal of Humour Research 12:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yehorova, Olesia, Antonina Prokopenko & Anna Zinchenko
2023. Towards a typology of humorous wartime tweets. The European Journal of Humour Research 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Balland, Ludivine
2022. Les goûts humoristiques comme rapports sociaux de classe. L’exemple des jeunes des fractions cultivées. Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods 11 DOI logo
Balland, Ludivine & Daniela Ginsburg
2022. Comedic Tastes as Social Relations of Class: The Example of Youth from Cultured Class Fractions. Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods 11 DOI logo
Birolini, Christophe
2022. “Some people work a bit more than me, and so we tease them”: the production of an elite student community in an elite French higher education institution. HUMOR 35:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Kuipers, Giselinde
2022. Humour, risk and religion. In Humour in the Beginning [Topics in Humor Research, 10], ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Nieuwenhuis, Ivo & Dick Zijp
2022. The politics and aesthetics of humour in an age of comic controversy. European Journal of Cultural Studies 25:2 ► pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Ziegele, Marc & Pablo B. Jost
2020. Not Funny? The Effects of Factual Versus Sarcastic Journalistic Responses to Uncivil User Comments. Communication Research 47:6 ► pp. 891 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue