In:Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory
Edited by Marta Dynel
[Topics in Humor Research 1] 2013
► pp. 49–74
Signals of humor
Encryption and laughter in social interaction
Published online: 15 October 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.1.04fla
https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.1.04fla
Laughter and humor often co-occur in social interaction, but their functional relationship is widely debated, and not well understood. The encryption theory of humor (Flamson and Barrett 2008) proposes that intentionally produced humor honestly signals the fact that speaker and audience share information, enabling the assessment of relative similarity and social assortment for compatibility over time. Drawing on relevance theory (Sperber and Wilson 1995) and other forms of post-Gricean pragmatics, humorous utterances and acts are considered encrypted in the sense that what makes them funny is not merely their surface content, but a relationship between the surface content and implied meaning understood by both the speaker and the audience. This theory provides a novel explanation of both the functions and the structure of humor, accounting for many of the characteristic features of humor production including its obliqueness, its subjectivity, and its variation both within and between cultures. While the ultimate function of this system is proposed to be social assortment, the proximate mechanism is seen as exploitable for any number of communicative acts. In addition, many existing accounts of the mechanics of humor production and appreciation are consistent with the encryption model. Laughter is a vocal signal closely related to humor, and can serve to communicate a wide range of intentions. The acoustic forms of laughter signals are intimately related to their particular communicative functions, and these functions can often be understood with reference to how humor is strategically used in any given communicative context. In this chapter, we will explore how the encryption theory of humor can illuminate our understanding of laughter, as well as the interaction between paralinguistic phenomena and the complexities of indirect communicative strategies more broadly. Making references to other models of humor, this chapter offers a theoretical review of the new proposal, based on experimental research findings.
Cited by (28)
Cited by 28 other publications
Xu, Jing & Yang Zhan
Fitrayatra, Eshauqi, Engkus Kuswarno & Ilham Gemiharto
Tammi, Tuure & Pauliina Rautio
Uwen, God'sgift Ogban
Yus, Francisco
Bryant, Gregory A. & Constance M. Bainbridge
Mauersberger, Heidi, Till Kastendieck, Annika Hetmann, Anja Schöll & Ursula Hess
Uwen, God'sgift Ogban & Godwin Oko Ushie
van der Does, Tamara, Mirta Galesic, Zackary Okun Dunivin & Paul E. Smaldino
Xu, Jing
Davila-Ross, Marina & Guillaume Dezecache
Winkler, Sasha L. & Gregory A. Bryant
Bryant, Gregory A., Christine S. Wang & Riccardo Fusaroli
Dale, Rick, Gregory A. Bryant, Joseph H. Manson & Matthew M. Gervais
Bryant, Gregory A., Daniel M. T. Fessler, Riccardo Fusaroli, Edward Clint, Dorsa Amir, Brenda Chávez, Kaleda K. Denton, Cinthya Díaz, Lealaiauloto Togiaso Duran, Jana Fanćovićová, Michal Fux, Erni Farida Ginting, Youssef Hasan, Anning Hu, Shanmukh V. Kamble, Tatsuya Kameda, Kiri Kuroda, Norman P. Li, Francesca R. Luberti, Raha Peyravi, Pavol Prokop, Katinka J. P. Quintelier, Hyun Jung Shin, Stefan Stieger, Lawrence S. Sugiyama, Ellis A. van den Hende, Hugo Viciana-Asensio, Saliha Elif Yildizhan, Jose C. Yong, Tessa Yuditha & Yi Zhou
Smaldino, Paul E., Thomas J. Flamson & Richard McElreath
Hillenbrand, Margaret
Flamson, Thomas & H. Clark Barrett
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
