Article In: Terminology: Online-First Articles
Term variation and framing in the context of ideological struggle
The discourse about surrogacy in Spanish
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Term variation relates to the representation and communication of specialized knowledge in different contexts.
Terminological choices reflect how a speaker understands a concept or wishes to present it in a given context; they can shape
understanding within specialized fields and influence public opinion on scientific issues. However, capturing systematic patterns
in these choices is challenging due the highly contextual nature of categorization. This study applies frame analysis to study the
behavior and motivations behind the use of term variants related to surrogacy, a controversial topic with legal, social and
economic dimensions. First, it performs a cognitive-semantic analysis of 30 term variants identified in scientific and activist
discourse, revealing different perspectives that range from critical to favorable towards the practice. Second, it examines how
these terms are used and framed in a corpus of Spanish press from different ideological orientations. Results show a correlation
between the evaluative valences of terms and frames in the case of less frequent variants, whereas the most frequent variants are
used across different frames. Furthermore, critical framings and terms are more common in progressive media outlets, emphasizing
the illegality and commodification of the practice. In contrast, liberal newspapers adopt more neutral and/or favorable framings,
focusing on the need for regulation or the personal experiences of intending parents. The findings provide insights into how
cognitive frames and terminological choices reflect broader ideological struggles in scientific and public discourse.
Keywords: term variation, frames, surrogacy, press discourse, cognitive context
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background
- 2.1Term variation and the dynamics of cognitive contexts
- 2.2Frames and its application in Terminology and media discourse analysis
- 2.3Term variation and framing of surrogacy in the press
- 3.Methods
- 3.1Identification of term variants in scientific and activist discourse
- 3.2Selection of newspaper articles
- 3.3Semantic analysis of term variants
- 3.4Identification of discursive frames
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1Semantic analysis: The terminological struggle around surrogacy
- 4.2Usage of term variants in the Spanish press
- 4.3Description of frames about surrogacy in the newspaper articles
- 4.4Correlation between terminological variants and frames
- 4.5Differences amongst newspapers: Frames and term variants
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (50)
Benítez, Valeria, and Pilar León-Araúz. 2023. “Denominative
Variation in the COVID-19 Open Research Dataset Corpus.” Terminology: International Journal of
Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized
Communication 29 (2): 252–305.
Bertulessi, Chiara. 2024. “Terminology,
Popularisation and Ideology in Contemporary China: The ‘Scientific & Technical Term of the Day’
Column.” Terminology: International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized
Communication 30 (1): 58–80.
Bureau, Pauline. 2024. “Climate
Knowledge or Climate Debate?: Using Word Embeddings and Critical Discourse Analysis to Compare Expert and Media
Representations of Climate Knowledge.” Terminology: International Journal of Theoretical and
Applied Issues in Specialized
Communication 30 (1): 35–57.
Cabré, María Teresa. 2008. “El principio de
poliedricidad: La articulación de lo discursivo, lo cognitivo y lo lingüístico en Terminología
(I).” Ibérica 161: 9–36.
Carvalho, Anabela. 2007. “Ideological
Cultures and Media Discourses on Scientific Knowledge: Re-Reading News on Climate
Change.” Public Understanding of
Science 16 (2): 223–243.
Cesare, Francesca de. 2017. “La gestación subrogada en los
titulares de la prensa
española.” Confluenze IX (2): 41–54.
Cienki, Alan. 2007. “Frames,
Idealized Cognitive Models, and Domains.” In The Oxford Handbook of
Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuykens, 170–187. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2007. “Framing
Theory.” Annual Review of Political
Science 10 (1): 103–126.
Cristina, Mariana. 2022. “¿Alquiler
o sustitución del embarazo? Sobre la importancia de los significantes en la construcción de
sentido.” Revista de Bioética y
Derecho, 541: 5–22.
. 2023. “Algunos
argumentos feministas para objetar la relación de alquiler del embarazo.” Análisis
Filosófico 43 (1): 179–206.
Curvadic, Dorde. 2002. “Los
marcos interpretativos textuales: herramienta metodológica para el análisis del discurso
periodístico”. Revista De Ciencias
Sociales, 961: 83–98.
Daille, Béatrice. 2017. Term
Variation in Specialised Corpora: Characterization, Automatic Discovery and
Applications. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
de Vreese, Claes H. 2002. Framing Europe: Television News and
European Integration. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers.
2005. “News Framing: Theory and
Typology.” Information Design Journal + Document
Design 13 (1): 51–62.
Durán-Muñoz, Isabel. 2016. “Producing
Frame-Based Definitions: A Case Study.” Terminology: International Journal of Theoretical and
Applied Issues in Specialized
Communication 22 (2): 223–249.
Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification
of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of
Communication 43 (4): 51–58.
Faber, Pamela, ed. 2012. A
Cognitive Linguistics View of Terminology and Specialized Language. New York: De Gruyter.
, ed. 2022. “Frame-Based
Terminology.” In Theoretical Perspectives on Terminology: Explaining
Terms, Concepts and Specialized Knowledge, edited by Pamela Faber and Marie-Claude L’Homme, 353–376. Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Faber, Pamela, Pilar León-Araúz, and Juan A. Prieto. 2009. “Semantic
Relations, Dynamicity, and Terminological Knowledge Bases.” Current Issues in Language
Studies 1 (1): 1–23.
Fernández-Silva, Sabela. 2022. “Cognitive
approaches to the study of term variation.” In Theoretical
perspectives on Terminology. Explaining terms, concepts and specialized knowledge, edited
by Pamela Faber and Marie-Claude L’Homme, 435–456. Amsterdan/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Fernández-Silva, Sabela, Judit Freixa, and M. Teresa Cabré. 2011. “A
Proposed Method for Analysing the Dynamics of Cognition through Term Variation”. Terminology:
International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized
Communication 17 (1): 49–74.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1977. “Topics in lexical
semantics.” In Current Issues in Linguistic
Theory, edited by Roger W. Cole, 76–138. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
2006. “Frame
Semantics.” In Cognitive Linguistics: Basic
Readings, edited by Dirk Geeraerts, 373–400. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Freixa, Judit. 2006. “Causes
of Denominative Variation in Terminology: A Typology Proposal”. Terminology: International
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized
Communication 12 (1): 51–77.
Freixa, Judit, and Sabela Fernandez-Silva. 2017. “Terminological
Variation and the Unsaturability of Concepts.” In Multiple
Perspectives on Terminological Variation, edited by Patrick Drouin, Aline Francoeur, John Humbley, and Aurélie Picton, 155–181. Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame
Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jefatura del Estado. Ley 14/2006, de 26 de mayo, sobre técnicas
de reproducción humana asistida.
BOE no. 126, 27
May 2006. BOE-A-2006-9292. [URL]
Kuperman, Victor, Zachary Estes, Marc Brysbaert and Amy Beth Warriner. 2014. “Emotion
and language: valence and arousal affect word recognition”. Journal of experimental psychology.
General 143(3): 1065–1081.
Leveau, Nicolas, Sandra Jhean-Larose, Guy Denhière, and Ba-Linh Nguyen. 2012. “Validating
an interlingual metanorm for emotional analysis of texts”. Behavior Research
Methods 441: 1007–1014.
Lamm, Eleonora. 2013. Gestación
por sustitución: Ni maternidad subrogada ni alquiler de
vientres. Barcelona: Publicacions de la UB.
León Aráuz, Pilar, and Anne Reimerink. 2014. “From
Term Dynamics to Concept Dynamics: Term Variation and Multidimensionality in the Psychiatric
Domain.” In Proceedings of the XVI EURALEX International
Congress, edited by Andrea Abel, Chiara Vettori, and Natascia Ralli, 657–667. Bolzano: EURALEX.
Markens, Susan. 2012. “The
Global Reproductive Health Market: U.S. Media Framings and Public Discourses about Transnational
Surrogacy.” Social Science &
Medicine 74 (11): 1745–1753.
McDonald, Kelsey, Rose Graves, Siyuan Yin, Tara Weese, and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. 2021. “Valence
framing effects on moral judgments: A
meta-analysis”. Cognition 2121: 104703.
Pei, Jiamin, and Le Cheng. 2020. “Mapping
Terminological Variation and Ideology in Data Protection Laws.” Terminology: International
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized
Communication 26 (2): 159–183.
Peruzzo, Katia, and Paola Catenaccio. 2024. “Introduction:
Terminology, Ideology and Discourse.” Terminology: International Journal of Theoretical and
Applied Issues in Specialized
Communication 30 (1): 1–10.
Posada Kubissa, Luisa. 2021. “Sobre
los ’vientres de alquiler’: Debates y reflexiones desde la crítica feminista.” EUNOMÍA: Revista
en Cultura de la
Legalidad, 201: 186–198.
Puleo, Alicia H. 2017. “Nuevas formas de desigualdad en
un mundo globalizado: El alquiler de úteros como extractivismo.” Revista Europea de Derechos
Fundamentales, 291: 165–184.
Reese, Stephen. 2001. “Framing
Public Life: A Bridging Model for Media Research.” In Framing Public
Life, edited by Stephen Reese, Oscar H. Gandy Jr., and August E. Grant, 7–31. Mahwah, NJ, London: Erlbaum.
Rodríguez-Jaume, M. José, M. José González-Río, and Diana Jareño-Ruiz. 2019. “Preguntas
y respuestas sobre la gestación por sustitución: Los estudios de opinión pública a
revisión.” Política y
Sociedad 56 (2): 295–316.
Rodríguez-Otero, Luis M., and Alma A. Villa-Rueda. 2023. “Representaciones
virtuales de la gestación subrogada en clínicas y agencias privadas mexicanas.” OBETS: Revista
de Ciencias
Sociales 18 (2): 343–364.
Rodríguez-Pedreira, Nuria. 2018. “De
la ’mère porteuse’ à la ’GPA’: Vers un contournement du tabou.” Acta Universitatis Lodziensis.
Folia Litteraria
Romanica, 121: 31–46.
Sanmartín, Julia. 2023. “Análisis
discursivo de la constelación léxica sobre gestación subrogada en medios de comunicación de España: Posicionamientos
ideológicos enfrentados.” Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la
Comunicación, 931: 271–287.
Sarasol, Clara, and Francisca Ramón. 2021. “La
Gestación Subrogada: Aspectos Éticos y Jurídicos en el Derecho Español.” JURÍDICAS
CUC 17 (1): 323–366.
Semetko, Holli A., and Patti M. Valkenburg. 2000. “Framing
European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News.” Journal of
Communication 50 (2): 93–109.
Temmerman, Rita. 2000. Towards
New Ways of Terminology Description: The Sociocognitive
Approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Tercedor, Maribel. 2011. “The
Cognitive Dynamics of Terminological
Variation.” Terminology 17 (2): 181–197.
Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. “The
framing of decisions and the psychology of
choice”. Science 211(4481): 453–458.
Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José M., Pamela Faber, and Miriam Buendía. 2013. “Frame
Blending in Specialized Language: Harmful Algal Bloom.” Terminology: International Journal of
Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized
Communication 19 (2): 175–201.