Cover not available

Article published In: Terminology, Ideology and Discourse
Edited by Katia Peruzzo and Paola Catenaccio
[Terminology 30:1] 2024
► pp. 134–158

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Metaphors for legal terms concerning vulnerable people

 | University of Verona
 | University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Published online: 18 July 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/term.00080.man
Abstract
This study takes a cognitive view of metaphor to investigate the terms designating vulnerable people used in two legal languages, namely English as used in the European Union and Mandarin Chinese. We applied a discourse dynamics approach to metaphor to explore the implicit connotations of the terms identifying different groups of vulnerable people (e.g., minors, disabled people, victims of human trafficking). The findings show that even when appearing in legal texts, many of the key terms for these groups are not objective, nor are they unbiased and detached from our subjective and bodily experience of the world. When these terms are connoted, they tend to have negative connotations, raising concerns about their social implications. This study highlights the entailments of embodiment theories for terminology and proposes that the identification of groups of vulnerable people is a social product motivated by unconscious relations of power rather than relations of assistance and reciprocity.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Metaphor and its framing power
  • 2.Material and method
    • 2.1Data
    • 2.2Method
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Metaphors concerning the vulnerable in English
      • 3.1.1Vulnerable people
      • 3.1.2Minors and unaccompanied minors
      • 3.1.3Disabled people/the disabled
      • 3.1.4Single parents with minor children
      • 3.1.5Victims of human trafficking
      • 3.1.6Persons with serious illnesses
      • 3.1.7Persons/people with mental disorders
      • 3.1.8Persons who have been subjected to torture/rape/serious forms of psychological, physical or sexual violence, such as victims of female genital mutilation
    • 3.2Metaphors concerning the vulnerable in Mandarin
      • 3.2.1Ruòshì qúntǐ 弱势群体 (vulnerable people)
      • 3.2.2Wèichéngniánrén 未成年人 and wèichéngnián 未成年 +agnz (minors)
      • 3.2.3Gūshēn wéichéngniánrén 孤身未成年人 and gūshēn értóng 孤身儿童 (unaccompanied minors)
      • 3.2.4Cánjírén 残疾人 and cánjí 残疾+agnz (disabled people)
      • 3.2.5Yǒu wèichéngniánrén de dānqīn 有未成年人的单亲 and yǒu wéichéngniánrén de dānshēn fùmǔ 有未成年人的单身父母 (single parents with minor children)
      • 3.2.6Guǎimài de shòuhàizhě 拐卖的受害者; rénkǒu fànmài de shòuhàizhě 人口贩卖的受害者 (victims of human trafficking)
      • 3.2.7Wēizhòng shāngbìng 危重伤病, wēizhòng bìngrén 危重病人 and wēizhòng huànzhě 危重患者 (persons with serious illnesses)
      • 3.2.8Jīngshén bìngrén 精神病人 (persons with mental disorders)
      • 3.2.9Bèi zhémo 被折磨 (persons who have been subjected to torture)
      • 3.2.10Qiángjiān 强奸, jiānyín 奸淫 (persons who have been subject to rape)
      • 3.2.11Persons who have been subject to other serious forms of psychological, physical or sexual violence, such as victims of female genital mutilation
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Chinese laws and regulations
  • Dictionaries and corpora
References (54)
References
Barker, Clare. 2011. Postcolonial Fiction and Disability: Exceptional Children, Metaphor and Materiality. Houndmills New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav. 2018. Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav, Pierre Weill-Tessier, and Tony McEnery. 2021. “LancsBox: Lancaster University Corpus Toolbox [Software run on a MacBook Air macOs 13.0].” [URL]
Buta, B., D. Leder, R. Miller, N. L. Schoenborn, A. R. Green, and R. Varadhan. 2018. “The Use of Figurative Language to Describe Frailty in Older Adults.” The Journal of Frailty & Aging 7 (2): 127–133.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Lynne. 2010. “The Discourse Dynamics Framework for Metaphor.” In Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities, ed. by Lynne Cameron and Robert Maslen, 77–94. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Lynne, Graham Low, and Robert Maslen. 2010. “Finding Systematicity in Metaphor Use.” In Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities, ed. by Lynne Cameron and Robert Maslen, 116–146. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, Daniel. 2009. “Embodiment of Abstract Concepts: Good and Bad in Right- and Left-Handers.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138 (3): 351–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Condello, Angela. 2016. “Metaphor as Analogy: Reproduction of Production of Legal Concepts.” In Law’s Metaphors: Interrogating Languages of Law, Justice, and Legitimacy, ed. by David Gurnham, 8–26. Malden, MA, Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 Laying down Standards for the Reception of Applicants for International Protection (Recast). 2013. Vol. 2013/33/EU.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dolmage, Jay. 2005. “Between the Valley and the Field: Metaphor and Disability.” Prose Studies 27 (1–2): 108–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Entman, Robert. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London, New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Victor. 1980. Attitudes and Disabled People: Issues for Discussion. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flusberg, Stephen J., Teenie Matlock, and Paul H. Thibodeau. 2018. “War Metaphors in Public Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 33 (1): 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gablasova, Dana, Vaclav Brezina, and Tony McEnery. 2017. “Collocations in Corpus-Based Language Learning Research.” Language Learning 67 (S1): 155–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gedzevičienė, Dalia. 2022. “Metaphorical Terms Denoting Intellectual Disability in Lithuanian Official Documents.” In Metaphor in Legal Discourse, ed. by Inesa Šeškauskienė, 50–80. New Castle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 2005. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gustavsson, Nora S. 1991. “The War Metaphor: A Threat to Vulnerable Populations.” Social Work (New York) 36 (4): 277–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Husa, Jaakko, and Mark Van Hoecke. 2013. Objectivity in law and legal reasoning. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgariff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Rychlý Pavel, and Vít Suchomel. 2014. “The Sketch Engine: Ten Years On.” Lexicography 11: 7–36.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
 facility available at [URL]
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. 2nd ed. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lawrence, Louise J. 2019. “Disease and Disability Metaphors in Gospel Worlds.” Interpretation (Richmond) 73 (4): 377–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mannoni, Michele. 2023. “冤 Yuan! Conceptual Metaphors for Injustice in Chinese.” Asiatische Studien – Études Asiatiques tba (tba): 1–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, Ivor Armstrong. 1965. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor, Evan Thompson, and Francisco J. Varela. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rychlý, Pavel. 2008. “A Lexicographer-Friendly Association Score.” In Proceedings of Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN 2008, ed. by Petr Sojka and Aleš Horák, 6–9. Brno: Masaryk University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schalk, Sami. 2017. “Interpreting Disability Metaphor and Race in Octavia Butler’s ‘The Evening and the Morning and the Night’.” African American Review 50 (2): 139–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, Elena. 2020. “‘Not Soldiers but Fire-Fighters’ – Metaphors and Covid-19.” Health Communication 36 (1): 50–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, Elena, Zsófia Demjén, and Jane Demmen. 2018. “An Integrated Approach to Metaphor and Framing in Cognition, Discourse, and Practice, with an Application to Metaphors for Cancer.” Applied Linguistics 39 (5): 625–645.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard J., Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, Tina Krennmayr, and Trijntje Pasma. 2010. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard J., W. Gudrun Reijnierse, and Christian Burgers. “When Do Natural Language Metaphors Influence Reasoning? A Follow-up Study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013).” PLoS One 9, no. 121 (2014): e113536. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stroch, Chani, Ravit Nussinson, Sari Mentser, and Yoav Bar-Anan. 2019. “‘Heavy of Mouth’ and ‘Heavy of Tongue’: Weight as a Conceptual Metaphor of Disability.” Metaphor and Symbol 34 (4): 197–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Šarčević, Susan. 1997. New Approach to Legal Translation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thibodeau, Paul H., and Lera Boroditsky. 2011. “Metaphors We Think with: The Role of Metaphors in Reasoning.” PLoS ONE 6 (2): 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thibodeau, Paul H., James L. McClelland, and Lera Boroditsky. 2009. “When a Bad Metaphor May Not Be a Victimless Crime: The Role of Metaphor in Social Policy.” In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 809–814. Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Ben Pin-Yun, Xiaofei Lu, Chan-Chia Hsu, Eric Po-Chung Lin, and Haiyang Ai. 2019. “Linguistic Metaphor Identification in Chinese.” In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages: MIPVU around the World, ed. by Susan Nacey, Tina Krennmayr, Aletta G. Dorst, and W. Gudrun Reijnierse, 247–265. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1986. “Metaphors Linguists Live by: Lakoff and Johnson Contra Aristotle.” Paper in Linguistics 19 (2): 287–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, Ning. 2016. “Spatial Metaphors for Morality: A Perspective from Chinese.” Metaphor and Symbol 31 (2): 108–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, Ning, Tianfang Wang, and Yinliang He. 2016. “Spatial Subsystem of Moral Metaphors: A Cognitive Semantic Study.” Metaphor and Symbol 31 (4): 195–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chinese laws and regulations
Civil Procedure Law (1991, 2017 amendment) (民事诉讼法)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vocational Education Law of the People’s Republic of China (1996, 2022 amendment) (职业教育法)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Provisional Regulations on VAT (2009) (增值税暂行条例)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Provisions on Special Protection of Minor Workers (1994) (未成年工特殊保护规定)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Regulation on Pensions and Preferential Treatments for Servicemen (2004) (军人抚恤优待条例)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dictionaries and corpora
#ChinLaC Baby, a sub-corpus of #ChinLaC (Bisetto, B., Mannoni, M., D’Attoma, S.) ([URL])
Great Dictionary of Modern Chinese (现代汉语大词典), available as an add-on through Pleco ([URL])
EUR-Lex_LEG, a sub-corpus of EUR-Lex English 2/2016 corpus, in Kilgariff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Rychlý Pavel, and Vít Suchomel. 2014. ‘The Sketch Engine: Ten Years On’. Lexicography 11: 7–36.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
 facility available at [URL]
Macmillan Dictionary ([URL])
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue