Cover not available

Article published In: Translation, Cognition & Behavior
Vol. 3:2 (2020) ► pp.241–262

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The early presence and developmental trend of interpreter advantages in cognitive flexibility

Effects from task differences and L2 proficiency

ORCiD logo with link | Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
ORCiD logo with link | Zhejiang University
Published online: 10 November 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00043.zha
Abstract
Findings about interpreter advantages in cognitive flexibility have been discrepant. To examine whether task differences and interpreters’ L2 proficiency contributed to the discrepancy, we tested two groups of university students (interpreting trainees vs. control participants) with two color-shape switching tasks differing in stimulus valence (univalent vs. bivalent). The results showed that: (1) only the univalent task detected a switch cost advantage for the interpreter group, indicating the task condition for observing interpreting trainees’ early advantage in local switching ability (as indexed by switch cost); (2) only the interpreter group with an advanced L2 proficiency showed a marginally significant mixing cost advantage over the control group, indicating a tendency toward an advantage in more global and sustained control. These findings suggest tentative explanations for the discrepant results in the literature and conditions for the presence and development of interpreter advantages in cognitive flexibility.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Switch cost or mixing cost advantages
      • Factor 1: Task differences
      • Factor 2: L2 proficiency
    • 1.2The present study
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Materials and tasks
    • 2.3Procedure
  • 3.Results testing Hypothesis 1
    • 3.1Data trimming
    • 3.2Group matching
    • 3.3Statistical analyses
    • 3.4The univalent task
      • Switch cost
      • Mixing cost
    • 3.5The bivalent task
      • Switch cost
      • Mixing cost
  • 4.Results testing Hypothesis 2
    • Switch cost
    • Mixing cost
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (44)
References
Abutalebi, J. and D. W. Green. 2016. “Neuroimaging of Language Control in Bilinguals: Neural Adaptation and Reserve.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19 (4): 689–698. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Babcock, L. and A. Vallesi. 2017. “Are Simultaneous Interpreters Expert Bilinguals, Unique Bilinguals, or Both?” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20 (2): 403–417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Babcock, L., M. Capizzi, S. Arbula and A. Vallesi. 2017. “Short-Term Memory Improvement After Simultaneous Interpretation Training.” Journal of Cognitive Enhancement 1 (3): 254–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becker, M., T. Schubert, T. Strobach, J. Gallinat and S. Kuhn. 2016. “Simultaneous Interpreters vs. Professional Multilingual Controls: Group Differences in Cognitive Control as well as Brain Structure and Function.” Neuroimage 1341: 250–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braver, T. S., J. R. Reynolds and D. I. Donaldson. 2003. “Neural Mechanisms of Transient and Sustained Cognitive Control during Task Switching.” Neuron 39 (4): 713–726. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cai, Rendong, Yanping Dong, Nan Zhao, and Jiexuan Lin. 2015. “Factors Contributing to Individual Differences in the Development of Consecutive Interpreting Competence for Beginner Student Interpreters.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 9 (1): 104–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Baene, W., W. Duyck, M. Brass and M. Carreiras. 2015. “Brain Circuit for Cognitive Control is Shared by Task and Language Switching.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 27 (9): 1752–1765. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diamond, A. 2013. “Executive functions.” Annual Review of Psychology 641: 135–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dong, Y. and Z. Xie. 2014. “Contributions of Second Language Proficiency and Interpreting Experience to Cognitive Control Differences among Young Adult Bilinguals.” Journal of Cognitive Psychology 26(5): 506–519. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dong, Y. and F. Zhong. 2019. “The Intense Bilingual Experience of Interpreting and Its Neurocognitive Consequences.” In The Handbook of the Neuroscience of Multilingualism. Edited by J. W. Schwieter, 685–700. Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dong, Y. and P. Li. 2015. “The Cognitive Science of Bilingualism.” Language and Linguistics Compass 9 (1): 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Attentional Control in Interpreting: A Model of Language Control and Processing Control.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dong, Y. and Y. Liu. 2016. “Classes in Translating and Interpreting Produce Differential Gains in Switching and Updating.” Frontiers in Psychology 71: 1297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García, A. M., E. Muñoz and B. Kogan. 2019. “Taxing the Bilingual Mind: Effects of Simultaneous Interpreting Experience on Verbal and Executive Mechanisms.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition: 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geranpayeh, A. 2003. “A Quick Review of the English Quick Placement Test.” Research Notes 121: 8–10.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gold, B. T., C. Kim, N. F. Johnson, R. J. Kryscio and C. D. Smith. 2013. “Lifelong Bilingualism Maintains Neural Efficiency for Cognitive Control in Aging.” Journal of Neuroscience 33 (2): 387–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilchey, Matthew O., Jean Saint-Aubin, and Raymond M. Klein. 2015. “Does Bilingual Exerciseenhance Cognitive Fitnessin Traditional Non-Linguistic Executive Processing Tasks?” In The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing. Edited by J. W. Schwieter, 586–613. Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiesel, A., M. Steinhauser, M. Wendt, M. Falkenstein, K. Jost, A. M. Philipp and I. Koch. 2010. “Control and Interference in Task Switching—A Review.” Psychological Bulletin 136 (5): 849. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, I., W. Prinz and A. Allport. 2005. “Involuntary Retrieval in Alphabet-arithmetic Tasks: Task-mixing and Task-switching Costs.” Psychological Research 69 (4): 252–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, P., F. A. N. Zhang, E. Tsai and B. Puls. 2013. “Language History Questionnaire (LHQ 2.0): A New Dynamic Web-based Research Tool.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17 (3): 673–680. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Logan, G. D. and C. Bundesen. 2003. “Clever Homunculus: Is There an Endogenous Act of Control in the Explicit Task-cuing Procedure?” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (3): 575–599. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mellinger, C. D. and T. A. Hanson. 2019. “Meta-analyses of simultaneous interpreting and working memory.” Interpreting 21 (2): 165–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miyake, A. and N. P. Friedman. 2012. “The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 21 (1): 8–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Monsell, S., T. J. Taylor and K. Murphy. 2001. “Naming the Color of a Word: Is It Responses or Task Sets that Compete?” Memory & Cognition 29 (1): 137–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paap, K. R. and O. Sawi. 2014. “Bilingual Advantages in Executive Functioning: Problems in Convergent Validity, Discriminant Validity, and the Identification of the Theoretical Constructs.” Frontiers in Psychology 51: 962. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paap, K. R. and Z. I. Greenberg. 2013. “There is No Coherent Evidence for a Bilingual Advantage in Executive Processing.” Cognitive Psychology 66 (2): 232–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pliatsikas, C. and G. Luk. 2016. “Executive Control in Bilinguals: A Concise Review on fMRI Studies.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19 (4): 699–705. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prior, A. and B. Macwhinney. 2010. “A Bilingual Advantage in Task Switching.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13 (2): 253–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prior, A. and T. H. Gollan. 2011. “Good Language-switchers are Good Task-switchers: Evidence from Spanish-English and Mandarin-English Bilinguals.” Journal of International Neuropsychological Society 17 (4): 682–691. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qu, L. I., J. J. W. Low, T. Zhang, H. Li and P. D. Zelazo. 2015. “Bilingual Advantage in Executive Control when Task Demands are Considered.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19 (2): 277–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H. and Raven, J. 1977. Manual for Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices: Sets I and II. London: H.K. Lewis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rubin, O. and I. Koch. 2006. “Exogenous Influences on Task Set Activation in Task Switching.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (6): 1033–1046. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rubin, O. and N. Meiran. 2005. “On the Origins of the Task Mixing Cost in the Cuing Task-switching Paradigm.” Journal of Experimental Psycholgy: Learning, Memmry and Cognition 31 (6): 1477–1491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santilli, M., M. G. Vilas, E. Mikulan, M. Martorell Caro, E. Muñoz, L. Sedeño, A. Ibáñez and A. M. García. 2018. “Bilingual Memory, to the Extreme: Lexical Processing in Simultaneous Interpreters.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22 (2): 331–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soveri, A., A. Rodriguez-Fornells and M. Laine. 2011. “Is There a Relationship between Language Switching and Executive Functions in Bilingualism? Introducing a Within-group Analysis Approach.” Frontiers in Psychology 21: 183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strobach, T., M. Becker, T. Schubert and S. Kuhn. 2015. “Better Dual-task Processing in Simultaneous Interpreters.” Frontiers in Psychology 61: 1590. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Syndicate, U. C. L. E. 2001. Quick Placement Test, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiseheart, M., M. Viswanathan and E. Bialystok. 2016. “Flexibility in Task Switching by Monolinguals and Bilinguals.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19 (1): 141–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van de Putte, E., W. De Baene, L. García-Pentón, E. Woumans, A. Dijkgraaf and W. Duyck. 2018. “Anatomical and Functional Changes in the Brain after Simultaneous Interpreting Training: A Longitudinal Study.” Cortex 991: 243–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandierendonck, A., B. Liefooghe and F. Verbruggen. 2010. “Task Switching: Interplay of Reconfiguration and Interference Control.” Psychological Bulletin 136(4): 601–626. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wen, H. and Y. Dong. 2019. “How does Interpreting Experience Enhance Working Memory and Short-term Memory: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Cognitive Psychology 31 (8): 769–784. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, H., A. Hartanto and S. Yang. 2016. “The Complex Nature of Bilinguals’ Language Usage Modulates Task-switching Outcomes.” Fronties in Psychology 71: 560. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yudes Gómez, C., Macizo Soria, P., & Bajo Molina, M. T. 2011. “The Influence of Expertise in Simultaneous Interpreting on Non-verbal Executive Processes.” Frontiers in Psychology 21, 309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Wen, Hao & Yanping Dong
2025. Language as a pathway to promote cognitive health in older adults: effects of Between-dialect Interpreting Training (BIT) on cognitive control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Zhilong & Meijing Chen
2025. The influence of L2 proficiency and interpreting experience on cognitive control among Chinese–English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo
Yang, Shuangshuang, Jan-Louis Kruger, Marc Orlando & Jennifer Batchelor
2025. Methods for exploring executive functions (EFs) in simultaneous interpreting (SI). Translation and Interpreting Studies 20:2 ► pp. 244 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Haoyun, Defeng Li, Victoria Lai Cheng Lei, Teng Ieng Leong, Cheok Teng Leong, Jiaze Li & Ruey-Song Huang
2025. Multifaceted multilingual experiences modulate neurocognitive mechanisms of task switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 28:5 ► pp. 1346 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Hongming, Xiaocong Chen & Yanping Dong
2024. Young interpreting trainees’ better adaptation to the flanker conflicting environment: An ERP study. Journal of Neurolinguistics 70 ► pp. 101181 ff. DOI logo
Song, Qichao, Ting Song & Xiaodong Fei
2023. Effects of executive functions on consecutive interpreting for Chinese-Japanese unbalanced bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Zhong, Fei & Yanping Dong
2023. On the way to an interpreter advantage in coordination: evidence from interpreting students across different training stages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 26:3 ► pp. 610 ff. DOI logo
Zhong, Fei & Yanping Dong
2024. ERP neural correlates of the interpreter advantage in coordination for interpreting students. Applied Psycholinguistics 45:5 ► pp. 897 ff. DOI logo
Zhong, Fei, Yanping Dong & Yaqiong Liu
2022. Neural correlates of contributions of interpreting training to second language semantic integration. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 75:1 ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
胡, 敏霞
2021. Review and Commentary on the Interactive Effects of Interpreting Experience and Executive Control. Modern Linguistics 09:02 ► pp. 283 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue