Cover not available

Article published In: Translation, Cognition & Behavior
Vol. 2:2 (2019) ► pp.263–282

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Thematic section

The negotiation of meaning in dialogue interpreting

On the effects of the verbalization of interpreters’ inferences

 | Université de Mons
 | Université de Mons
Published online: 6 September 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00029.del
Abstract
The objective of this study is to contribute to a better understanding of the negotiation of meaning between the participants of a bilingual interpreter-mediated interaction by analysing the effects of the verbalization of the inferences by the interpreter. The conceptual tools of Relevance Theory were applied to three interpreted excerpts of Russian-French psychotherapeutic interactions. The results suggest that, by verbalizing inferences, the interpreter co-creates a shared cognitive environment, reinforces intra- and inter-discursive coherence, diminishes the cognitive efforts of the recipient, and encourages primary parties to cooperate. The analysis of the cognitive processes at work in the excerpts tends to show that what has so far been treated as the interpreter’s “additions” or “expanded renditions” enables the latter to exercise cooperative coordination of interaction, and could therefore be more precisely called collaborative renditions.
Article outline
  • 1.Objective of the study
  • 2.The Relevance Theory framework
  • 3.Analysis: Inferential processes and negotiation of meaning
    • 3.1Presentation of discursive data
    • 3.2 Excerpt I (EnTh5 / 39: 24–40: 36)
    • 3.3 Excerpt II (EnTh4–11: 12–16: 47)
    • 3.4 Excerpt III (EnTh7 / 39: 25–48: 50)
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (34)
References
Albl-Mikasa, Michaela. 2016. “Notation Language and Notation Text: a Cognitive-linguistic model of consecutive interpreting”. In Consecutive Notetaking and Interpreter Training. Edited by Y. Someya, 71–117. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amossy, Ruth. 2008. “Argumentation et analyse du discours : Perspectives théoriques et découpages disciplinaires [Argumentation and discourse analysis: theoretical perspectives and disciplinary boundaries]”. Argumentation et Analyse du Discours 11: 2–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baraldi, Claudio, and Laura Gavioli, eds. 2012. Coordinating Participation in Dialogue Interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Are Close Renditions the Golden Standard? Some thoughts on translating accurately in healthcare interpreter-mediated interaction”. In Dialogue Interpreting in Practice: Bridging the Gap between Empirical Research and Interpreter Education. Edited by E. Davitti and S. Pasquandrea, special issue of The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 8 (3): 336–353.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delizée, Anne. 2018. Du rôle de l’interprète en santé mentale: analyse socio-discursive de ses positions subjectives au sein de la triade thérapeute-patient-interprète [on the interpreter’s role in mental health settings: socio-discursive analysis of the interpreter’s subjective positions within the triad therapist-patient-interpreter]. PhD Thesis, University of Mons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delizée, Anne, and Christine Michaux. 2017. “Discussion critique interprétée & stratégies argumentatives et discursives : analyse du positionnement intersubjectif de l’interprète [Interpreted critical discussion & discursive and argumentative strategies: an analysis of the interpreter’s intersubjective positioning]”. In Public Service Interpreting: The Interpreter’s Discourse and its Influence on the Interpersonal Relationship. Discursive and argumentative approaches. Edited by E. Gallez, A. Delizée, S. Vogeleer, Ch. Michaux, and A. Al-Laithy, special issue of Dragoman 5 (7): 86–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. In press. “Les représentations mentales de l’interprète de dialogue : de la pertinence locale à la cohérence discursive globale [Dialogue interpreter’s mental representations: from local relevance to global discursive coherence]”. In Déverbaliser-reverbaliser. Edited by S. Vogeleer and L. Béghin, 169–94. Louvain: Presses universitaires.
Englund Dimitrova, Birgitta, and Elisabet Tiselius. 2016. “Cognitive Aspects of Community Interpreting. Toward a process model”. In Reembedding Translation Process Research. Edited by R. Muñoz, 195–214. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallez, Emmanuelle. 2014. Ethos et interprétation judiciaire: Une étude de cas [Ethos and interpreting in court proceedings: a case study]. PhD Diss., University of Leuven.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosz, Barbara J., and Candace L. Sidner. 1986. “Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse”. Computational Linguistics 12 (3): 175–204.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutt, Ersnt-August. 1991. Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction”. In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Edited by G. H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mason, Ian. 2006a. “On Mutual Accessibility of Contextual Assumptions in Dialogue Interpreting”. Journal of Pragmatics 381: 359–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006b. “Ostension, Inference and Response: Analysing participant moves in community interpreting dialogues”. In Taking Stock: Research and Methodology in Community Interpreting. Edited by Eric Hertog and B. van der Veer, special issue of Linguistica Antverpiensia (5): 103–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Gaze, Positioning and Identity in Interpreter-mediated Dialogues”. In Coordinating Participation in Dialogue Interpreting. Edited by C. Baraldi and L. Gavioli, 177–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques, et Nina de Spengler. 1981. “Quand même: de la concession à la réfutation” [ Quand même: from concession to refutation]. Cahiers de linguistique française 21: 93–112.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Lectures on Pragmatism. Volume VI1. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penn, Claire, and Jennifer Watermeyer. 2012. “Cultural Brokerage and Overcoming Communication Barriers: A case study from aphasia”. In Coordinating Participation in Dialogue Interpreting. Edited by C. Baraldi and L. Gavioli, 269–295. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez González, Luis. 2006. “Interpreting Strategic Recontextualization Cues in the Courtroom: Corpus-based Insights into the Pragmatic Force of Non-restrictive Relative Clauses”. Journal of Pragmatics 38 (3): 390–417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation (1964–1972). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. La Pertinence. Communication et cognition. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. “Forme linguistique et pertinence” [Linguistic form and relevance]. Cahiers de linguistique française 111: 13–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation”. Research on Language & Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1996. La nouvelle dialectique [New dialectics]. Paris: Editions Kimé.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Peter Houtlosser. 2006. “Strategic Manoeuvering: A Synthetic Recapitulation”. Argumentation 201: 381–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vianna, Branca. 2005. “Simultaneous Interpreting: A Relevance-theoretic Approach”. Intercultural Pragmatics 2 (2): 169–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vogeleer, Svetlana. In press. “Le modèle vertical du processus de traduction, la question du transfert et la place des représentations mentales” [Vertical model of translation, the transfer and mental representations issues]. In Déverbaliser-reverbaliser. Edited by S. Vogeleer and L. Béghin, Presses universitaires de Louvain, 217–47.
Wadensjö, Cecilia. 1998. Interpreting as Interaction. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, David J. 2005. “A Tale of Two Translation Theories”. Journal of Translation 1 (2): 35–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Апресян, Валентина Юрьевна. 2005. “Трехвалентные уступительные слова” [Trivalent concessive words]. In Труды международного семинара Диалог 2005 по компьютерной лингвистике и ее приложениям, 34–38. Moscow. [URL] Accessed 1 October 2015.
Ефремова, Татьяна Фёдоровна. 2000. Толковый словарь Ефремовой Т.Ф. [Dictionary by T. F. Efremova] Moscow: Russian language.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Defrancq, Bart & Sofie Verliefde
2023. A Dutch discourse marker in interpreter-mediated police interviewing with drafting: A corpus-based approach to dialogue interpreting. Research in Corpus Linguistics 11:2 ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Weber, Orest, Jonathan Klemp, Florian Chmetz, Argyro Daliani, Esther-Amélie Diserens & Florence Faucherre
2023. Interpreter-mediated psychiatric assessments: Metacommunication as key. Transcultural Psychiatry 60:4 ► pp. 626 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue