Cover not available

Article published In: Translation, Cognition & Behavior
Vol. 1:1 (2018) ► pp.1–20

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Order effects in the translation process

 | University of North Carolina at Charlotte
 | Minnesota State University Moorhead
Published online: 2 March 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00001.mel
Abstract
This study investigates how the order in which various translation memory match-types occur in a target language version of a text may influence translator behavior and cognition. Empirical research designs often attempt to mitigate for possible confounds from order effects, yet explicit recognition of the time-series nature of data collection can yield a better understanding of the influence that translation technologies have on the translation task. Data are drawn from a previous study that investigated technical, temporal, and cognitive effort in a translation memory environment, and here we analyze the time-series data for potential order effects. Findings show that order effects are present in some instances during the sequential progression through the target text, particularly with respect to technical and cognitive effort. Results are also suggestive of a potential first impression effect.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Time series in translation
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Procedures
    • 3.3Measures
    • 3.4Analysis
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Perception of difficulty
    • 5.2First impression effect
    • 5.3Future research
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (50)
References
Alves, Fabio. 2005. “Ritmo cognitivo, meta-função e experiencia: parámetros de análise processual no desempenho de tradutores novatos e experientes.” In Competência em tradução: cognição e discurso. Edited by F. Alves, C. Magalhães, and A. Pagano, 109–169. Belo Horizonte: Editorial UFMG.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alves, Fabio, and Daniel Vale. 2009. “Probing the Unit of Translation in Time: Aspects of the Design and Development of a Web Application for Storing, Annotating, and Querying Translation Process Data.” Across Languages and Cultures 10 (2): 251–273. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Norman H., and Stephen Hubert. 1963. “Effects of Concomitant Verbal Recall on Order Effects in Personality Impression Formation.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 2 (5–6): 379–391. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Angelone, Erik. 2012. “The Place of Screen Recording in Process-oriented Translator Training.” Rivista Internazionale di Tecnica della Traduzione (RITT) 141: 41–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Watching and Learning from ‘Virtual Professionals’: Utilizing Screen Recording in Process-oriented Translator Training.” In New Prospects and Perspectives for Educating Language Mediators. Edited by D. Kiraly, S. Hansen-Schirra, and K. Maksymski, 139–155. Tübingen: Günther Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bansback, Nick, Linda C. Li, Larry Lynd, and Stirling Bryan. 2014. “Exploiting Order Effects to Improve the Quality of Decisions.” Patient Education and Counseling 96 (2): 197–203. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bausenhart, Karin M., Oliver Dyjas, and Rolf Ulrich. 2015. “Effects of Stimulus Order on Discrimination Sensitivity for Short and Long Durations.” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 77 (4): 1033–1043. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen J. and Jerold B. Warner. 1985. “Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies.” Journal of Financial Economics 14 (1): 3–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christensen, Tina Paulsen, and Anne Schjoldager. 2015. “Computer-aided Translation Tools: The Uptake and Use by Danish Translation Service Providers.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 251: 89–105.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denkowski, Michael, and Alan Lavie. 2012. “TransCenter: Web-based Translation Research Suite.” AMTA 2012 Workshop on Post-Editing Technology and Practice Demo Session.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dragsted, Barbara. 2004. Segmentation in Translation and Translation Memory Systems: An Empirical Investigation of Cognitive Segmentation and Effects of Integrating a TM-System into the Translation Process. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Computer-aided Translation as a Distributed Cognitive Task.” In Cognition Distributed: How Cognitive Technology Extends our Minds. Edited by I. E. Dror and S. Harnad, 237–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dragsted, Barbara, and Inge Gorm Hansen. 2008. “Comprehension and Production in Translation: A Pilot Study on Segmentation and the Coordination of Reading and Writing Processes.” In Looking at Eyes: Eye-Tracking Studies of Reading and Translation Processing. Edited by S. Göpferich, A. L. Jakobsen, and I. Mees, 9–30. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. “Localization and the (R)Evolution of Translation.” In A Companion to Translation Studies. Edited by S. Bermann and C. Porter, 147–162. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckes, Thomas. 2008. “Rater Types in Writing Performance Assessments: A Classification Approach to Rater Variability.” Language Testing 25 (2): 155–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehrensberger-Dow, Maureen. 2017. “An Ergonomic Perspective of Translation.” In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Edited by J. W. Schwieter and A. Ferreira, 332–349. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enríquez Raído, Vanessa. 2014. Translation and Web Searching. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gile, Daniel. 2016. “Experimental Research.” In Researching Translation and Interpreting. Edited by C. V. Angelelli and B. J. Baer, 220–228. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guerberof Arenas, Ana. 2009. “Productivity and Quality in the Post-editing of Outputs from Translation Memories and Machine Translation.” Localisation Focus 7 (1): 11–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hvelplund, Kristian. 2017. “Eye Tracking in Translation Process Research.” In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Edited by J. W. Schwieter and A. Ferreira, 248–264. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke. 1999. “Logging Target Text Production with Translong.” In Probing the Process in Translation: Methods and Results. Edited by G. e Hansen, 9–20. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Translation Drafting by Professional Translators and by Translation Students.” In Empirical Translation Studies: Process and Product. Edited by Gyde Hansen, 191–204. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Tracking Translators’ Keystrokes and Eye Movements with Translog.” In Methods and Strategies of Process Research: Integrative Approaches to Translation Studies. Edited by C. Alvstad, A. Hild, and E. Tiselius, 37–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke, and Kristian T. H. Jensen. 2008. “Eye Movement Behavior Across Four Different Types of Reading Task.” Copenhagen Studies in Language 361: 103–124.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jensen, Kristian T. H. 2011. “Distribution of Attention Between Source Text and Target Text during Translation.” In Cognitive Explorations of Translation. Edited by S. O’Brien, 215–237. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krings, Hans P. 2001. Repairing Texts: Empirical Investigations of Machine Translation Post-editing Processes. Edited by G. S. Koby. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumpulainen, Minna. 2015. “On the Operationalization of ‘Pauses’ in Translation Process Research.” Translation & Interpreting 7 (1): 47–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lacruz, Isabel, Gregory M. Shreve, and Erik Angelone. 2012. “Average Pause Ratio as an Indicator of Cognitive Effort in Post-editing: A Case Study.” Proceedings of the AMTA 2012 Workshop on Post-editing Technology and Practice. San Diego, CA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LeBlanc, Matthieu. 2013. “Translators on Translation Memory (TM): Results of an Ethnographic Study in Three Translation Services and Agencies.” Translation & Interpreting 5 (2): 1–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindgaard, Gitte, Gary Fernandes, Cathy Dudek, and Judith M. Brown. 2006. “Attention Web Designers: You Have 50 Milliseconds to Make a Good First Impression!” Behaviour & Information Technology 25 (2): 115–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mellinger, Christopher D. 2014. Computer-Assisted Translation: An Empirical Investigation of Cognitive Effort. Ph.D. dissertation, Kent State University, OH. Available at [URL]
2015. “On the Applicability of Internet-Mediated Research Methods to Investigate Translators’ Cognitive Behavior.” Translation & Interpreting 7 (1): 59–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mellinger, Christopher D., and Gregory M. Shreve. 2016. “Match Evaluation and Over-editing in a Translation Memory Environment.” In Reembedding Translation Process Research. Edited by R. Muñoz, 131–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mellinger, Christopher D., and Thomas A. Hanson. 2017. Quantitative Research Methods in Translation and Interpreting Studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michels, Walter C., and Harry Helson. 1954. “A Quantitative Theory of Time-order Effects.” The American Journal of Psychology 67 (2): 327–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Brien, Sharon. 2006. “Pauses as Indicators of Cognitive Effort in Post-editing Machine Translation Output.” Across Language and Cultures 7 (1): 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Eye-tracking and Translation Memory Matches.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 14 (3): 185–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony. 2011. “What Technology Does to Translating.” Translation & Interpreting 3 (1): 1–9.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2016. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. [URL].
Ruokonen, Minna, and Kaisa Koskinen. 2017. “Dancing with Technology: Translators’ Narratives on the Dance of Human and Machinic Agency in Translation Work.” The Translator 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saldanha, Gabriela, and Sharon O’Brien. 2013. Research Methodologies in Translation Studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schilperoord, Joost. 1996. It’s about Time: Temporal Aspects of Cognitive Processes in Text Production. Utrecht: USI &C.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shreve, Gregory M., Christina Schäffner, Joseph H. Danks, and Jennifer Griffin. 1993. “Is There a Special Kind of ‘Reading’ for Translation? An Empirical Investigation of Reading in the Translation Process.” Target 5 (1): 21–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weigle, Sara Cushing. 1994. “Effects of Training on Raters of ESL Compositions.” Language Testing 11 (2): 171–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whyatt, Bogusława, Katarzyna Stachowiak, and Marta Kajzer-Wietrzny. 2016. “Similar and Different: Cognitive Rhythm and Effort in Translation and Paraphasing.” Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 52 (2): 175–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Korpal, Paweł & Christopher D. Mellinger
2025. Stress and accent in community interpreting. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 61:4 ► pp. 521 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Xiao & Ying Cui
2024. The impact of text type on Chinese-English translation effort: an investigation with reference to translation entropy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1 DOI logo
ROJO LÓPEZ, ANA MARÍA, María Inmaculada Vicente López & Kristian Tangsgaard Hvelplund
2024. Measuring cognitive effort in post-editing: an eye-tracking study comparing professional and student translators. Tradumàtica tecnologies de la traducció :22 ► pp. 112 ff. DOI logo
Mellinger, Christopher D.
2023. Embedding, extending, and distributing interpreter cognition with technology. In Interpreting Technologies – Current and Future Trends [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 37], ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Whyatt, Bogusława
2022. In search of directionality effectsin the translation processand in the end product. Translation, Cognition & Behavior ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Xiangyan, Xiangling Wang & Xiaodong Liu
2022. The impact of task complexity and translating self-efficacy belief on students’ translation performance: Evidence from process and product data. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Whyatt, Bogusława, Olga Witczak & Ewa Tomczak
2021. Information behaviour in bidirectional translators: focus on online resources. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 15:2 ► pp. 154 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue