Cover not available

In:Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference
Edited by Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 8] 2015
► pp. 247–270

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Teachers evaluating tasks

 | University of Auckland and Shanghai International Studies University
Published online: 5 November 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.8.09ell
Conducting action research is not something that teachers always find easy. Nunan (1990) reported that teachers’ action research proposals tended to be rather grand and unmanageable because they had failed to identify specific research questions. I propose that one practical way in which teachers can research their teaching is by carrying out micro-evaluations of instructional tasks. In this paper I report my experience of requiring students enrolled in a course on task-based teaching as part of their MA studies to undertake an evaluation of a task. They were first asked to design their own task in groups. They then planned a micro-evaluation of the task, taught the task and in the process collected data for the evaluation, and finally wrote a report. I use examples of their reports to discuss how they planned their evaluations, the process of conducting the evaluations, and the kinds of findings they came up with. I also examine the utility of such micro-evaluations as a means of developing teachers’ understanding of task-based teaching.
References (44)
References
Allwright, D. (2003). Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 7, 113–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case for exploratory practice. Modern Language Journal, 89, 353–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloom, M. (2007). Tensions in a non-traditional classroom. Language Teaching Research, 11, 85–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chan, S.H. (1995). A micro-evaluation-based task evaluation. Unpublished MA paper,Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coughlan, P., & Duff, P. 1994. Same task, different activities: analysis of SLA from an activity theory perspective. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approach to second language research, pp. 173–194. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cox, D. (2005). Can we predict language items for open tasks? In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), (pp.171–186).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckerth, J. (2008). Task-based language learning and teaching – Old wine in new bottles? In J. Eckerth & S. Siekmann (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching: Theoretical, methodological, and pedagogical perspectives, (pp. 13–46). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, C., & Willis, J. (Eds.). (2005). Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching. Houndmills: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51: 36–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1998). The evaluation of communicative tasks. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 217–238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001). Non-reciprocal tasks, comprehension and second language acquisition. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second Language Learning, teaching and testing (pp. 49–74). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). Macro- and micro-evaluations of task-based teaching. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching, (2nd ed.) (pp. 212–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H. & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S., Mackey, A. & Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55, 575–611. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, C. (2005). Fighting fossilization: Language at different stages in the task cycle. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), (pp.191–200).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (2000). What task designers do. Language Teaching Research, 4, 301–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, S-M. (2005). Training young learners in meaning negotiation skills: Does it help? In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), (pp.103–112).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loschky, L. (1994). Comprehensible input and second language acquisition: What is the relationship? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 303–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loumpourdi, L. (2005). Developing from PPP to TBL: A focused grammar task. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), (pp.33–39).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: an empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,21, 557–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp.407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markee, N. (1994). Towards an ethnomethodological respecification of second language acquisition studies. In E. Tarone, S. Gass & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 89–116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muller, T. (2005). Adding tasks to textbooks for beginner learners. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), (pp. 69–77).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1990). The teacher as researcher. In C. Brumfit & R. Mitchell (Eds), Research in the language classroom. ELT documents 133 (pp.16–32). London: Modern English Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pica, T. (1997). Second language teaching and research relationships: A North American view. Language Teaching Research, 1, 48–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language research and instruction. In. G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning (pp.9–34). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P. (2005). ‘Task’ as research construct. Language Learning, 55, 533–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slimani, A. (1989). The role of topicalization in classroom language learning. System, 17, 223–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slimani-Rolls, A. (2005). Rethinking task-based language learning: What we can learn from the learners. Language Teaching Research, 9, 195–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M. & Norris, J. (Eds.). (2009). Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weir, C., & Roberts, J. (1994). Evaluation in ELT. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Introduction: Aims and explorations into tasks and task-based teaching. In C. Edwards & J. Willis (Eds.), (pp.1–12).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, T. (1992). Classroom research and teacher education: Towards a collaborative approach. In J. Flowerdew, M. Brock, & S. Hsia (Eds.), Perspectives on second language teacher education (pp.187–209). Hong Kong: City Polytechnic of Hong Kong.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (14)

Cited by 14 other publications

García Mayo, María del Pilar & Masatoshi Sato
2025. Young L2 learners in diverse instructional contexts. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 63:3 ► pp. 1533 ff. DOI logo
Konzett-Firth, Carmen
2025. Pre-service teachers' understanding of teaching L2 French interactional competence through TBLT: Insights from task design processes and post-implementation reflections. System 128 ► pp. 103549 ff. DOI logo
Mostafaei Alaei, Mahnaz & Abbas Mansouri
2025. Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 63:2 ► pp. 995 ff. DOI logo
Schmiderer, Katrin, Nicola Brocca, Elisa Guggenbichler & Carmen Konzett-Firth
2025. Exploring pre-service teachers’ criteria for evaluating collaboratively designed online tasks. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 5:1 ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Shintani, Natsuko, Sora Shioji & Takuro Fujita
2025. Implementing an oral task in an EFL classroom with low proficient learners: a micro-evaluation. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 63:3 ► pp. 1667 ff. DOI logo
Uyar, Gülşah & Ufuk Balaman
2025. Claims of teacher learning and retrospective tracing of claimed events in video-mediated transnational virtual exchange interactions. Applied Linguistics DOI logo
Jackson, Daniel O.
2022. Task-Based Language Teaching, DOI logo
Ellis, Rod
2021. Options in a task-based language-teaching curriculum. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 1:1 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Ellis, Rod
2024. Conclusion. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
Baralt, Melissa
2018. Becoming a task-based teacher educator. In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12], ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Baralt, Melissa
2019. Reflections on Task-Based Language Teaching. ELT Journal 73:2 ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Samuda, Virginia, Martin Bygate & Kris Van den Branden
2018. Introduction. In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Samuda, Virginia
2015. Tasks, design, and the architecture of pedagogical spaces. In Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 8], ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. How to Teach an Additional Language [Task-Based Language Teaching, 15], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue