In:Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference
Edited by Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 8] 2015
► pp. 193–224
Linking ‘task’ and curricular thinking
An affirmation of the TBLT educational agenda
Published online: 5 November 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.8.07byr
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.8.07byr
The article argues that an important challenge for TBLT, as a fundamentally education-oriented effort within language teaching and learning studies, is to arrive at a foundation for the construct of ‘task’ that captures its holistic understanding of language, language use, and language learning in a way that goes beyond affirming its orientation toward communication. If the construct of task is to facilitate learners’ ability to expand their meaning-making capacities in oral and written discourse, attaining that goal will require a repositioning of ‘task’ in a number of fundamental ways. The article highlights and discusses the opportunities for doing so by embedding task into a framework that is genre-oriented in its curricular thinking and task-based in its pedagogical manifestations. Specifically, it identifies parameters for curriculum development that would support fundamental TBLT interests; describes impediments to curricular thinking that must be overcome; introduces an understanding of curriculum that is suited to being translated into educational contexts; and offers a set of considerations that can provide the foundation for curriculum development. Ideally, these new forms of task-oriented curriculum development will involve a series of steps ‘from below’, a form of empowerment of educators, and a series of steps ‘from above’, where the adoption of a functional (as contrasted with a structural) theory of language, here represented by systemic functional linguistics, is likely to be crucial. When such a functional theory is further tailored to educational imperatives through the construct of genre, it is possible to reposition ‘task’ as a genre-based educative effort that can be expected to make significant contributions not only to the TBLT agenda itself but to the entire field of languages studies.
References (78)
Allen, L. (2000). Designing curriculum for standards-based culture/language learning. Northeast Conference Reviw, 47, 14–21.
Bernhardt, E., Valdés, G., & Miano, A. (2010). A chronicle of Standards-based curricular reform in a research university. In V.M. Scott (Ed.), Principles and practices of the Standards in college foreign language education (pp. 54–85). Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage Learning.
Breen, M., & Candlin, C. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1, 89–112.
Breen, M., Hird, B., Milton, M. Oliver, R., & Thwaite, A. (2001). Making sense of language teaching: Teachers' principles and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 22, 470–501.
Bunch, G., & Willett, K. (2013). Writing to mean in middle school: Understanding how second language writers negotiate textually-rich content-area instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 141–178.
Busse, V., & Walter, C. (2013). Foreign language motivation in higher education: A longitudinal study of motivational changes and their causes. Modern Language Journal, 97, 435–456.
Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216–236). New York, NY: Routledge.
Bygate, M., Norris, J., & Van den Branden, K. (2009). Coda: Understanding TBLT at the interface between research and pedagogy. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J.M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 495–499). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bylund, E., & Athanasopoulos, P. (Guest eds.). (2015). The language and thought of motion in second language speakers. Modern Language Journal, 99-S.
Byrnes, H. (2002). The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate FL curriculum. Language Testing, 19, 419–437.
. (2007). Language acquisition and language learning. In D.G. Nicholls (Ed.), Introduction to scholarship in modern languages and literatures, (3rd. ed.) (pp. 48–69). New York, NY: MLA.
. (Ed.). (2009). Instructed foreign language acquisition as meaning-making: A systemic functional approach. Special Issue: Linguistics and Education, 20, 1–79.
. (2012a). Conceptualizing FL writing development in collegiate settings: A genre-based systemic functional linguistic approach. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 190–218). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
. (2012b). Of frameworks and the goals of collegiate foreign language education: Critical reflections. Applied Linguistics Review, 3, 1–24.
. (2013). Positioning writing as meaning-making in writing research: An introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 95–106.
. (2014a). Linking task and writing for language development: Evidence from a genre-based curricular approach. In H. Byrnes & R.M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 235–261). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2014b). Theorizing language development at the intersection of 'task' and L2 writing: Reconsidering complexity. In H. Byrnes & R.M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 79–103). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Byrnes, H., Crane, C., Maxim, H.H., & Sprang, K.A. (2006). Taking text to task: Issues and choices in curriculum construction. ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 152, 85–110.
Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R.M. (Eds.). (2014a). Task-based L2 language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Byrnes, H., & Manchon, R.M. (2014b). Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing: An introduction. In H. Byrnes & R.M. Manchon (Eds.), Task-based L2 language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R.M. (2014c). Task, task performance, and writing development: Advancing the constructs and the research agenda. In H. Byrnes & R.M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based L2 language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 265–296). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Byrnes, H., Maxim, H.H., & Norris, J.M. (2010). Realizing advanced foreign language writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. Modern Language Journal, 94, s-1, iv–vi, 1–235.
Christie, F. (2012). Language education throughout the school years: A functional perspective. Language Learning, 62, S-1.
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.
Coffin, C. (2006). Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.
Crookes, G. (1986). Task classification: A cross-disciplinary review. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa, Social Science Research Institute, Center for Second Language Classroom Research (Technical Report No. 4).
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7–21.
Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 431–469.
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2013). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. New York, NY: Routledge.
Flowerdew, J. (2011). Reconciling contrasting approaches to genre analysis: The whole can equal more than the sum of the parts. In D. Belcher, A.M. Johns, & B. Paltridge (Eds.), New directions in English for Specific Purposes research (pp. 119–144). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Gebhard, M., Chen, I-A., Graham, H., & Gunawan, W. (2013).Teaching to mean, writing to mean: SFL, L2 literacy, and teacher education. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 107–124.
Gebhard, M., & Harman, R. (2011). Reconsidering genre theory in K–12 schools: A response to school reforms in the United States. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 45–55.
Gebhard, M., Willet, J., Jimenez, J., & Piedra A. (2010). Systemic functional linguistics, teachers' professional development, and ELLS' academic literacy practices. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Preparing all teachers to teach English language learners (pp. 91–110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz, The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Basic Books.
Haim, O. (2015). Investigating transfer of academic proficiency among trilingual immigrant students: A holistic tri-directional approach. Modern Language Journal, 99(4).
Halliday, M.A.K. (2007). The notion of "context" in language education (1991). In J.J. Webster (Ed.), The collected works of M. A. K. Halliday. Vol. 9, Language and education (pp. 269–290). London: Continuum.
Harman, R. (2013). Literary intertextuality in genre-based pedagogies: Building lexical cohesion in fifth-grade L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 125–140.
Hulstjin, I., Young, R.F., & Ortega, L. (Guest Eds.) (2014). Bridging the gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 361–421.
Kubanyiova, M., & Crookes, G. (2016). Re-envisioning the roles and tasks of language teachers in the post-centenary era of modern language education research. Modern Language Journal, 100-S.
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Speaking and writing tasks and their effects on second language performance. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 365–377). New York, NY: Routledge.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1993). The name of the task and task of naming: Methodological aspects of task-based pedagogy. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 69–96). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Lantolf, J.P. (2005). Sociocultural and second language learning research: an exegesis. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), The handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 335–353). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Reflecting on the cognitive–social debate in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91, S-1, 773–787.
. (2011). A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 48–72). Routledge: New York.
Leow, R.P. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 557–584.
Long. M.H. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In M.H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 19–76). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Long, M.H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 27–56.
Martin, J.R. (1984). Language, register and genre. In F. Christie (Ed.), Children writing: A reader (pp. 21 –30). Geelong, VIC, Australia: Deakin University Press.
. (1985). Process and text. Two aspects of human semiosis. In J.D. Benson & W.S. Greaves (Eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse (pp. 243–274). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20, 10–21.
Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2009). Meaning in the making: Meaning potential emerging from acts of meaning. Language Learning, 59, S-1, 206–229.
MLA Ad Hoc Committee on Foreign Languages. (2007). Foreign languages and higher education: New structures for a changed world. Profession 2007, 234–245.
Perspectives (2013). Proficiency benchmarks and tests for K–12 world language educators. Modern Language Journal, 97, 652–673.
Pienemann, M. (2007). Processability theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 137–154) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2010). Towards mastering the discourses of reasoning: Use of grammatical metaphor at advanced levels of foreign language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 92, 181–197.
. (2011). Developmental changes in the use of interactional resources: Persuading the reader in FL book reviews. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 243–256.
. (2013). Preparing graduate student teachers for advanced content-based instruction: Exploring content through grammatical metaphor. In H. Willis Allen & H.H. Maxim (Eds.), Educating the future FL professoriate for the 21st century (pp. 82–104). Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning.
Ryshina-Pankova, M., & Byrnes, H. (2013). Writing as learning to know: Tracing knowledge construction in L2 German compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 179–197.
Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 119–140). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
Schleppegrell, M.J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schleppegrell, M.J., & O'Hallaron, C.L. (2011). Teaching academic language in L2 secondary settings. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 3–18.
Schmidt, R.W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sprang, K.A. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition and advanced learners: The role of grammaticization and conceptual organization in the acquisition of German verbs with inseparable prefixes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
VanPatten, B. (Ed.) (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Van den Branden, K. (Ed.) (2006). Task-based language education. From theory to practive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J.M. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Introducing the reader. In K. van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J.M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 2–13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (19)
Cited by 19 other publications
Gutiérrez, Xavier
Li, Hongyu & Nathan Thomas
2023. Chinese EFL teachers’ understandings and implementation of task-based language teaching. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 3:2 ► pp. 305 ff.
Ellis, Rod
2021. Options in a task-based language-teaching curriculum. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 1:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Bernhardt, Elizabeth, Paul Nissler & Cici Malik Leffell
Andon, Nick, Martin Dewey & Constant Leung
2018. Tasks in the pedagogic space. In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12], ► pp. 235 ff.
Bygate, Martin
2018. Creating and using the space for speaking within the foreign language classroom. In Speaking in a Second Language [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 17], ► pp. 153 ff.
Bygate, Martin
Byrnes, Heidi
Byrnes, Heidi
Byrnes, Heidi
Byrnes, Heidi
2020. Envisioning L2 writing development in CDST under a curricular
optic. In Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 54], ► pp. 241 ff.
Byrnes, Heidi
2020. Toward an agenda for researching L2 writing and language learning. In Writing and Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 56], ► pp. 73 ff.
Byrnes, Heidi
Samuda, Virginia, Martin Bygate & Kris Van den Branden
2018. Introduction. In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12], ► pp. 1 ff.
Kim, Youjin, Yeonjoo Jung & Nicole Tracy‐Ventura
Lee, Josephine & Alfred Rue Burch
Samuda, Virginia
2015. Tasks, design, and the architecture of pedagogical spaces. In Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 8], ► pp. 271 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
