In:Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference
Edited by Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 8] 2015
► pp. 123–156
Limited Attention Capacity and Cognition
Two hypotheses regarding second language performance on tasks
Published online: 5 November 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.8.05ske
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.8.05ske
The chapter is part of a Point-Counterpoint (with Robinson, this volume), exploring the Limited Attention Capacity (LAC) and Cognition Hypotheses (CH) as alternative accounts of second language task performance. It starts by presenting five principles which underlie the LAC, covering memory and attentional functioning; the dimensions of performance; the role of research on task characteristics and conditions; the linkage with Levelt’s model of speaking; and the notion of, and influences on task difficulty. Then a survey is presented of the empirical work that is relevant to the LAC, organised in terms of the stages of the Levelt Model. Next, the Cognition Hypothesis is described, particularly resource-directing and resource-dispersing features, and the hypothesis is critiqued, both in relation to the constructs of the model and in relation to relevant evidence. This leads to a comparison between the two approaches, regarding hinterland, regarding how influences on second language task performance are analysed, and regarding what the two approaches say, or do not say, about acquisition. Finally some suggestions are made as to how the two approaches may be brought into resolution, at least to some degree.
References (65)
Baddeley, A. (2015). Working memory in second language learning. In Z. Wen, M.B. Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: Theories, research, and commentaries (pp. 17–28). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Baralt, M.L. (2010). Task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, and interaction in CMC and FTF environments. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Georgetown University.
Bialystok, E. (1994). Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 157–168.
Brown, G.,Anderson, A., Shilcock, R., & Yule, G. (1984). Teaching talk: Strategies for production and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bui, H.Y.G. (2014). Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning, and proficiency levels. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 63–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Longman.
Bygate M. (2006). Areas of research that influence L2 speaking instruction. In E. Uso-Juan & A. Martinez-Flor (Eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp. 159–186). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Bygate M., & Samuda V. (2009). Creating pressure in task pedagogy: The joint roles of field, purpose, and engagement within the interactional approach. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction (pp. 90–116). New York, NY: Routledge.
Cowan, N. (2015). Second-language use, theories of working memory, and the Vennian mind. In Z. Wen, M.B. Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: Theories, research, and commentaries (pp. 29–40). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
De Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt's “Speaking” model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24.
Ellis, D. (2011). The role of task complexity in the linguistic complexity of native speaker output. Qualifying Paper, Ph.D. in Second Language Acquisition program. College Park, MD.: University of Maryland.
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2005). The effect of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 167–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–324.
. (2012). Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A synthesis of the Ealing research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in SLA (pp. 199–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2013). Anticipating a post-task activity: The effects on accuracy, complexity and fluency of L2 language performance. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(3), 249–273.
Foster, P., & Tavakoli, P. (2009). Native speakers and task performance: Comparing effects on complexity, fluency, and lexical diversity. Language Learning, 59(4), 866–896.
Garcia-Mayo, M.P. (2007). Investigating tasks in formal language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Givón, T. (1985). Function, structure, and language acquisition. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1 (pp. 1008–1025). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jackson, D.O., & Suethanapornkul, S. (2013). The Cognition Hypothesis: A synthesis and meta-analysis of research on second language task complexity. Language Learning, 63(2), 330–367.
Kim, Y. (2013). Investigating learners’ cognitive processes by using stimulated recall methodology in task-based research. In A. Revesz & R. Gilabert (Organizers), SLA methodological advances in TBLT research: Measurement of task demands and processes. Colloquium presented at American Association for Applied Linguistics 2013 conference, Dallas, TX.
Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. (1999). Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Li, Q. (2014). Get it right in the end: The effects of post-task transcribing on learners' oral performance. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 129–154). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Long, M.H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language development (pp. 77–99). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Lynch, T. (2001). Seeing what they meant: Transcribing as a route to noticing. ELT Journal, 55, 124–132.
Malicka, A., & Levkina, M. (2012). Measuring task complexity: Does L2 proficiency matter? In A. Shehadeh & C. Coombe (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation (pp. 43–66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Meara, P., & Bell, H. (2001). P_Lex: A simple and effective way of describing the lexical characteristics of short L2 texts. Prospect, 16(3), 5–19.
Michel, M.C. (2011). Effects of task complexity and interaction on L2 performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 141–174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Miller, G. (1956). The magical number 7, plus or minus 2: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards and organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: the case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578.
Ortega, L. (2005). What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77–109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pang, F., & Skehan, P. (2014). Self-reported planning behaviour and second language performance in narrative retelling. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 95–128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Plough, I., & Gass, S. (1993). Interlocutor and task familiarity: Effects on interactional structure. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning (pp. 35–56). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Revesz, A. (2009). Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(3), 437–470.
. (2014). Towards a fuller assessment of cognitive models of task-based learning: Investigating task-generated cognitive demands and processes. Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 93–98.
Revesz, A., Sachs, R., & Mackey, A. (2011). Task complexity, uptake of recasts, and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 203–235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Revesz, A., Sachs, R., & Hama, M. (2013). Eye tracking as a means of investigating task-based cognitive processes
. In A. Revesz & R. Gilabert (Organizers), SLA methodological advances in TBLT research: Measurement of task demands and processes. Colloquium presented at American Association for Applied Linguistics 2013 conference, Dallas, TX.
Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp 3–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sasayama, S. (2014). Measuring cognitive task complexity from the learners' perspective. Presentation at
TBL In Asia Conference. Osaka, Japan.
Schur, E. (2007). Insights into the structure of L1 and L2 vocabulary networks: Intimations of small worlds. In H. Daller & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge (pp. 182–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38–62.
. (2009a). Models of speaking and the assessment of second language proficiency. In A. Benati (Ed.), Issues in second language proficiency (pp. 202–215). London: Continuum.
. (2009b). Lexical performance by native and non-native speakers on language-learning tasks. In B. Richards, H. Daller, D.D. Malvern, & P. Meara (Eds.), Studies in first and second language vocabulary acquisition: The interface between theory and application (pp. 107–124). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
. (2012), Researching tasks: performance, assessment, pedagogy. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
. (2013). Nurturing noticing. In J. Bergsleithner, S.N. Frota, & J.K. Yoshioka (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt (pp. 169–180). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Center.
. (Ed.) (2014a). Processing perspectives on task performance, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2014b). Synthesising and applying task research. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 211–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). The influence of planning and post-task activities on accuracy and complexity in task based learning. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185–211.
Skehan, P., & Shum, S. (2014). Structure and processing condition in video-based narrative retelling. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 197–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Skehan, P., Bei, X.,Li, Q., & Wang, Z. (2012). The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 170–187.
Tavakoli, P. (2009). Investigating task difficulty: Learners’ and teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 1–25.
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58(2), 439–473.
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wang, Z. (2009). Modelling speech production and performance: Evidence from five types of planning and two task structures. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Chinese University of Hong Kong.
. (2014). On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 27–62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wang, Z., & Skehan, P. (2014). Task structure, time perspective and lexical demands during video-based narrative retellings. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 155–186). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (50)
Cited by 50 other publications
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Mark D. Johnson & Mahsa Farahanynia
Imaz Agirre, Ainara, Roberto Arias-Hermoso & Nagore Ipiña
Jin, Chaoyang & Jing Yan
Luo, Xinran & Peijian Paul Sun
Qiu, Xuyan
Qiu, Xuyan & Gavin Bui
Rohloff, Tio, Marina Frank & Jörg Peters
Róg, Tomasz
Tran, Phuong Nhi, Pham Thi Hong Nhung, Huy Van Nguyen & Bao Trang Thi Nguyen
Yenkimaleki, Mahmood & Vincent J. van Heuven
2025. The effect of fluency training on interpreter trainees’ speech fluency, comprehensibility, and
accentedness. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 38:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
Mora-Plaza, Ingrid, Joan C. Mora, Mireia Ortega & Cristina Aliaga-Garcia
Song, Gyumin & Byeonggon Min
Sophocleous, Andry
Stritar Kučuk, Mojca
Barkaoui, Khaled
2023. Exploring task effects on register variation in second language learners’ writing. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 3:1 ► pp. 109 ff.
Kaufmann, Austin, Adam Gacs, Luca Giupponi & Koen Van Gorp
Santos, Sara
Wu, Jingwen & Rod Ellis
Awwad, Anas & Parvaneh Tavakoli
González-Lloret, Marta
2022. The present and future of functional adequacy. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 2:1 ► pp. 146 ff.
Qiu, Xuyan & Hong Cheng
Spada, Nina
Spada, Nina
2025. Reflecting on task-based language teaching from an Instructed SLA perspective. In Broadening the Horizon of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 17], ► pp. 164 ff.
Awwad, Anas & Rashed Alhamad
Awwad, Anas & Rashed Alhamad
Crawford, William J. & Meixiu Zhang
2021. How can register analysis inform task-based language teaching?. Register Studies 3:2 ► pp. 180 ff.
Crawford, William J. & Meixiu Zhang
2025. Describing and interpreting task performance using a register functional approach. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 5:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
Duran-Karaoz, Zeynep & Parvaneh Tavakoli
TAVAKOLI, PARVANEH, FUMIYO NAKATSUHARA & ANN–MARIE HUNTER
D’Ely, Raquel, Mailce Borges Mota & Martin Bygate
2019. Strategic planning and repetition as metacognitive processes in task performance. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 199 ff.
Granena, Gisela & Yucel Yilmaz
2019. Phonological short-term memory capacity and L2 oral performance. Journal of Second Language Studies 2:2 ► pp. 317 ff.
Granena, Gisela & Yucel Yilmaz
2021. Phonological short-term memory capacity and L2 oral performance. In Aptitude-Treatment Interaction in Second Language Learning [Benjamins Current Topics, 116], ► pp. 153 ff.
Long, Michael H., Jiyong Lee & Kyoko Kobayashi Hillman
Michel, Marije, Andrea Révész, Danni Shi & Yanmei Li
2019. The effects of task demands on linguistic complexity and accuracy across task types and L1/L2 speakers. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 133 ff.
Sasayama, Shoko & John Norris
2019. Unravelling cognitive task complexity. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 95 ff.
Tavakoli, Parvaneh
2019. Automaticity, fluency and second language task performance. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 39 ff.
Xing, Jiaxin & Shaoqian Luo
2019. The effects of reasoning demands on Chinese EFL learners’ oral performance and cognitive processes. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 153 ff.
Bui, Gavin, Peter Skehan & Zhan Wang
Bygate, Martin
2018. Creating and using the space for speaking within the foreign language classroom. In Speaking in a Second Language [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 17], ► pp. 153 ff.
Han, ZhaoHong & Eun Young Kang
Samuda, Virginia, Martin Bygate & Kris Van den Branden
2018. Introduction. In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12], ► pp. 1 ff.
Taguchi, Naoko & YouJin Kim
2018. Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. In Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics [Task-Based Language Teaching, 10], ► pp. 1 ff.
Vangehuchten, Lieve, Mariëlle Leijten & Iris Schrijver
2018. Reading-to-write tasks for professional purposes in Spanish as a foreign language. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 638 ff.
Lee, Josephine & Alfred Rue Burch
García Mayo, Maria del Pilar & Ainara Imaz Agirre
Révész, Andrea & Laura Gurzynski-Weiss
Skehan, Peter
Skehan, Peter
2022. Performance on second language speaking tasks. In Second Language Acquisition Theory [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 14], ► pp. 211 ff.
Samuda, Virginia
2015. Tasks, design, and the architecture of pedagogical spaces. In Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 8], ► pp. 271 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
