In:Task-Based Language Learning – Insights from and for L2 Writing:
Edited by Heidi Byrnes and Rosa M. Manchón
[Task-Based Language Teaching 7] 2014
► pp. 237–263
Linking task and writing for language development
Evidence from a genre-based curricular approach
Published online: 14 November 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.7.10byr
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.7.10byr
This chapter explores the link between task and writing by taking an education-oriented view, in order to contribute to answering the question of how L2 writing development to advanced ability levels might best be fostered through genre-oriented TBLT instruction. A companion to the theoretical treatment of task and writing offered in Chapter 4, the chapter interprets language development as an increase in textual meaning-making through genre-based writing tasks. Within that approach it reshapes ‘complexity’ in terms of choices in textual meaning-making and proposes textually oriented parameters for operationalizing complexification. In addition, it suggests the construct of grammatical metaphor (GM) as theorized in systemic functional linguistics (SFL) as especially well-suited for delineating, fostering, and assessing critical aspects of language development. Reflecting this approach, the chapter presents evidence from a longitudinal study about how L2 writing development unfolded in a genre-based approach to task within a curricular context. The focal area of analysis and interpretation are formal aspects of GM, realized through nominalization, and their implications for a developing textual meaning-making ability. Aligning itself with recent scholarship that has called for the careful specification of educational contexts if research findings are to be relevant for language teaching and learning, the chapter concludes with reflections that affirm the potential for genre-based writing tasks to provide a suitably differentiated awareness of the nature of instructed language development within a well-specified curricular framework.
References (42)
Bunch, G., & Willett, K. (2013). Writing to mean in middle school: Understanding how second language writers negotiate textually-rich content-area instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 141–178.
Bygate, M., Norris, J., & Van den Branden, K. (2009). Coda: Understanding TBLT at the interface between research and pedagogy. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J.M. Norris (Eds.),
Task-based language teaching: A reader
(pp. 495–499). Amsterdam: John Benjamins..
Byrnes, H. (2002). The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate FL curriculum. Language Testing, 19, 419–437.
. (2009a). Emergent L2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and Education, 20, 50–66.
. (Guest Ed.). (2009b). Instructed foreign language acquisition as meaning-making: A systemic-functional approach. Linguistics and Education, 20, 1–79.
. (2011). Beyond writing as language learning or content learning: Construing foreign language writing as meaning-making. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.),
Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language
(pp. 133–157). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2012). Conceptualizing FL writing development in collegiate settings: A genre-based systemic functional linguistic approach. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.),
L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives
(pp. 190–218). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Byrnes, H., Crane, C., Maxim, H.H., & Sprang, K.A. (2006). Taking text to task: Issues and choices in curriculum construction. ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 152, 85–110.
Byrnes, H., Maxim, H.H., & Norris, J.M. (2010). Realizing advanced foreign language writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. Modern Language Journal, 94 (Supplement s-1).
Byrnes, H., Norris, J.M., Pfeiffer, P.C., & Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2014). Fifteen years of program evaluation: Innovation and accountability in the Georgetown German program. In J.M. Norris & N. Mills (Eds.),
Innovation and accountability in foreign language program evaluation
. Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage.
Christie, F. (2012). Language education throughout the school years: A functional perspective. Language Learning, 62(Supplement 1).
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008).
School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling
. London: Continuum.
Coffin, C. (2006).
Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation
. London: Continuum.
Derewianka, B. (1995). Language development in the transition from childhood to adolescence: The role of grammatical metaphor. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
. (2003). Grammatical metaphor in the transition to adolescence. In A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen, M. Tavernier, & L. Ravelli (Eds.),
Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics
(pp. 185–219). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gebhard, M., Chen, I.A., Graham, H., & Gunawan, W. (2013). Teaching to mean, writing to mean: SFL, L2 literacy, and teacher education. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 107–124.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.),
Motivation, language identity and the L2 self
(pp. 9–42). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93–116.
. (1996). On grammar and grammatics. In R. Hasan, C. Cloran, & D.G. Butt (Eds.),
Functional descriptions: Theory in practice
(pp. 1–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (1999). Grammar and the construction of educational knowledge. In R. Berry, B. Asker, K. Hyland, & M. Lam (Eds.), Language analysis, description and pedagogy (pp. 70–87). Hong Kong: Language Centre, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology and Department of English, Lingnan University.
. (2002). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In J.J. Webster (Ed.),
On grammar
(pp. 323–351). London: Continuum.
. (2010). Putting linguistic theory to work. Plenary presented at the 2010 AAAL conference, Atlanta, GA, March 6.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (1999).
Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition
. London: Continuum.
Harman, R. (2013). Literary intertextuality in genre-based pedagogies: Building lexical cohesion in fifth-grade L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 125–140.
Liardét, C. (2013). An exploration of Chinese EFL learners’ deployment of grammatical metaphor: Learning to make academically valued meanings. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 161–178.
Manchón, R.M. (2011). Situating the learning-to-write and writing-to-learn dimensions of L2 writing. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.),
Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language
(pp. 3–14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Martin, J.R. (2007). Construing knowledge: A functional linguistic perspective. In F. Christie & J.R. Martin (Eds.),
Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives
(pp. 34–64). London: Continuum.
Norris, J.M., & Manchón, R.M. (2012). Investigating L2 writing development from multiple perspectives: Issues in theory and research. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.),
L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives
(pp. 219–245). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578.
Peng, J.-E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingess to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60, 834–876.
Pfeiffer, P.C., & Byrnes, H. (2009). Curriculum, learning, and the identity of majors: A case study of program outcomes evaluation. In J.M. Norris, J. Davis, C. Sinicrope, & Y. Watanabe (Eds.),
Toward useful program evaluation in college foreign language education
(pp. 183–208). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center Monograph series.
Robinson, P. (2011). Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning 61, S-1, 1-36.
Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2006). Creating textual worlds in advanced learner writing: The role of complex theme. In H. Byrnes (Ed.),
Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and
Vygotsky
(pp. 164–183). London: Continuum.
. (2010). Towards mastering the discourses of reasoning: Use of grammatical metaphor at advanced levels of foreign language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 92, 181–197.
. (2011). Developmental changes in the use of interactional resources. Persuading the reader in FL book reviews. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 243–256.
Ryshina-Pankova, M., & Byrnes, H. (2013). Analyzing writing as learning to mean: The role of nominalization in L2 German compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 179–197.
Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P. & Swain, M. (Eds.),
Researching pedagogic tasks: second language learning, teaching and assessment
(pp.119-140). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Schleppegrell, M.J. (2004).
The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective
. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
. (2013). The role of metalanguage in supporting academic language development. Language Learning, 63 (Supplement s-1), 153–170.
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M., Taverniers, M., & Ravelli, L. (Eds.). (2003).
Grammatical metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Qin, Jie & Dilin Liu
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud
Coffin, Caroline
2017. Introduction to part II. In Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 47], ► pp. 91 ff.
Jackson, Daniel O. & Alfred Rue Burch
Yasuda, Sachiko
TENG, LIN SOPHIE & LAWRENCE JUN ZHANG
Byrnes, Heidi
2015. Linking ‘task’ and curricular thinking. In Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 8], ► pp. 193 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
