Cover not available

In:Task-Based Language Learning – Insights from and for L2 Writing:
Edited by Heidi Byrnes and Rosa M. Manchón
[Task-Based Language Teaching 7] 2014
► pp. 107–136

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Task repetition and L2 writing development

A longitudinal study from a Dynamic Systems perspective

Published online: 14 November 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.7.05nit
Previous research has shown that repetition of a task improves L2 oral performance in terms of fluency and complexity (e.g. Bygate 2001). However, there is no clear evidence regarding the effects of task repetition and task-type repetition on L2 writing ability. Using a Dynamic Systems perspective, this study investigates longitudinally over a one-year period whether any noticeable changes are brought about through repeating a timed writing task. Forty-six first-year Japanese university students participated in this project for thirty weeks. Each week students wrote a composition on a chosen topic for ten minutes; the topic was changed every two weeks. A group-level analysis of 1300 compositions with five indices of fluency and syntactic and lexical measures shows that, while the effects of specific task repetition were limited, task-type repetition did have a marked effect on writing in terms of lexical and grammatical aspects. An individual-level analysis suggests that task-type repetition does not have an identical effect on student writing development in terms of linguistic features. Based on these findings, we suggest that the benefits of repeating the task may not show up in the short term but that repetition over an extended period would yield positive effects on students’ writing.
References (62)
References
Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R., & Guilikers, L. (1996). CELEX . Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baba, K., & Nitta, R. (2011). Dynamic effects of task type practice on the Japanese EFL university student's writing: Text analysis with Coh-Metrix. In P.M. McCarthy & C. Boonthum-Denecke (Eds.), Applied natural language processing: Identification, investigation and resolution (pp. 398–413). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, J.D. (2008). The Bonferroni adjustment. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 12, 23–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136–146). Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.). Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bygate, M., Norris, J.M., & Van den Branden, K. (2009). Coda: Understanding TBLT at the interface between research and pedagogy. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J.M. Norris (Eds.) Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 495–499). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casanave, C.P. (2004). Controversies in second language writing: Dilemmas and decisions in research and instruction . Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coughlan, P., & Duff, P. (1994). Same task, different activities: Analysis of a SLA task from an Activity Theory perspective. In J.P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 173–194). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In M.H. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 5–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duppenthaler, P. (2004). A study of the effect of three different types of feedback on writing: Part 2 – Data analysis. Tezukayama Gakuin Daigaku Kenkyu Ronju, Bungakubu [Tezukayama Gakuin University Studies and Essays, Faculty of Literature] 39, 1–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 474–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferris, D.R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez–Torres, M.J., & Fernández–García, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49 (4), 549–581. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., Louwerse, M.M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 193–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harklau, L. (2002). The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 329–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30, 461–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishikawa, S. (1995). Objective measurement of low-proficiency EFL narrative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 51–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kellogg, R.T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C.M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 57–72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590–619. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). Adjusting expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30, 579–589. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics . Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation . Boston, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, M.D. (2005). Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 169–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liao, M.-T., & Wong, C.-T. (2010). Effects of dialogue journals on L2 students' writing fluency, reflections, anxiety, and motivation. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 9, 139–170.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M.H. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R.D. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy (pp. 179–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynch, T., & MacLean, J. (2001). Effects of the benefits of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 141–162). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malvern, D.D., Richards, B.J., Chipere, N., & Duran, P. (2004). Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment . Houndmills: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manchón, R.M. (2011). The language learning potential of writing in foreign language contexts: Lessons from research. In T. Cimasko & M. Reichelt (Eds.), Foreign language writing instruction: Principles and practices (pp. 44–64). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manchón, R.M., & Roca de Larios, J. (2007). Writing-to-learn in instructed language learning contexts. In E. Alcón-Soler & M.P. Safont-Jordá (Eds.). Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 101–122). Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). Writing to learn in FL contexts: Exploring learners' perceptions of the language learning potential of L2 writing. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.,) Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 181–207). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, P.M., Cai, Z., & McNamara, D.S. (2009). Computational replication of human paraphrase assessment. In C.H. Lane & H.W. Guesgen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22 nd International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (pp. 266–271). Menlo Park, CA: The AAAI Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, P.M., & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 381–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24, 492–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, L., & Iberri-Shea, G. (2005). Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 26–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peyton, J.K. (1990). Dialogue journal writing and the acquisition of English grammatical morphology. In J.K. Peyton (Ed.), Students and teachers writing together: Perspectives on journal writing (pp. 67–97). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polio, C., & Williams, J. (2009). Teaching and testing writing. In M.H. Long & C.J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 486–517). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning . Houndmills: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, P., & Liu, E.T.K. (1998). What develops in the development of second language writing? Applied Linguistics, 19, 225–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning . Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M. (2010). Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31, 532–553. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thelen, E., & Smith, L.B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Truscott, J., & Hsu, A.Y.-P. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tudor, I. (2001). The dynamics of the language classroom . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K. (2006). Introduction: Task-based language teaching in a nutshell. In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language education (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). Second language education: Practice in perfect learning conditions? In R. DeKeyser (Ed.). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 161–179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J.M. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Introducing the reader. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J.M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 1–13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, M., Verspoor, M., & Lowie, W. (2011). Variability and DST. In M.H. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 55–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Geert, P. (2008). The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 92, 179–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Geert, P., & van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior & Development, 25, 340–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Gelder, T., & Port, R.F. (1995). It's about time: An overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In R.F. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition (pp. 1–44). Boston, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research . Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & van Dijk, M. (2008). Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92, 214–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verspoor, M.H., & van Dijk, M. (2011). Visualizing interaction between variables. In M.H. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.). A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 85–98). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weigle, S.C. (2006). Investing in assessment: Designing tests to promote positive washback. In P.K. Matsuda,. C. Ortmeier–Hooper, & X. You (Eds.), The politics of second language writing: In search of the promised land (pp. 222–244). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weissberg, R. (1998). Acquiring English syntax through journal writing. College ESL, 8, 1–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, J. (2012). The potential role (s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfe–Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wong, W. (2001). Modality and attention to meaning and form in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 345–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (33)

Cited by 33 other publications

Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud & Minyoung Cho
2025. Task sequencing and L2 writing development: Exploring the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. Language Teaching Research 29:3 ► pp. 1235 ff. DOI logo
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud & Mahsa Farahanynia
2025. Exploring the interplay between task-readiness factors and task complexity in L2 writing performance and anxiety. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics DOI logo
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Hansol Lee & Keiko Hanzawa
2025. Effects of massed and spaced task repetitions on L2 writing task performance and task emotions. Reading and Writing DOI logo
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Xiaofei Lu & Renfen Hu
2025. The effects of task complexity and task repetition on sense-aware frequency-based lexical sophistication indices in L2 writing. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Baba, Kyoko & Ryo Nitta
2025. Two stories on applying novel methods. In Research Methods in CDST Approaches to SLD [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 14], ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Guerrero-Gomez, Janire, María Orcasitas-Vicandi & Marta Kopinska
2025. Enhancing young EFL learners’ written skills: the role of repeated pre-task planning. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 63:2 ► pp. 1421 ff. DOI logo
Hiver, Phil, Ali H. Al‐Hoorie & Akira Murakami
2025. Modeling the Effects of Task Repetition in Second Language Writing: Examining Interindividual and Intraindividual Variability. Language Learning 75:2 ► pp. 493 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Junge & Yinjie Tang
2025. The effect of task repetition on L2 learners’ writing performance: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Mostafaei Alaei, Mahnaz & Abbas Mansouri
2025. Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 63:2 ► pp. 995 ff. DOI logo
Roothooft, Hanne, Amparo Lázaro-Ibarrola & Bram Bulté
2025. Task repetition and corrective feedback via models and direct corrections among young EFL writers: Draft quality and task motivation. Language Teaching Research 29:3 ► pp. 1311 ff. DOI logo
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Sima Khezrlou & Yu Tian
2024. Verb argument construction complexity indices and L2 written production: effects of task complexity and task repetition. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 18:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi, Sima Khezrlou & Yu Tian
2024. Task complexity, task repetition, and L2 writing complexity: exploring interactions in the TBLT domain. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 62:2 ► pp. 871 ff. DOI logo
Cui, Yachong & Shaoqian Luo
2024. “Writing-to-learn”: the influence of task repetition on CSL writers’ attention to form. Applied Linguistics Review 15:3 ► pp. 793 ff. DOI logo
Fogal, Gary G.
2024. Raising learner awareness of L2 writing spaces: supporting researchers, teachers, and learners through system mapping. Language Awareness 33:3 ► pp. 528 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Jie
2024. Meaning-oriented understanding of L2 academic writing development with task-type repetition. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1 DOI logo
Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi & Seyyed Ehsan Golparvar
2024. The interplay of task repetition and task rehearsal in L2 written production across varied proficiency levels. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Abrams, Zsuzsanna
2023. Examining the role of peer collaborative feedback processing and task repetition in task-based L2 writing. In L2 Collaborative Writing in Diverse Learning Contexts [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 59], ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo
2023. Do task repetition and pretask focus on form instruction impact collaborative writing performance?. In L2 Collaborative Writing in Diverse Learning Contexts [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 59], ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Fukunaga, Tatsushi
2023. L2 writing development through two types of writing task repetition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:3 ► pp. 1109 ff. DOI logo
Kheirzadeh, Shiela & Maryam Malakootikhah
2023. The Role of Content and Procedural Repetition in EFL Learners’ Reading Performance. Journal of College Reading and Learning 53:2 ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Kim, YouJin, Bumyong Choi, Hyunae Yun, Binna Kim & Sujeong Choi
2022. Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research 26:6 ► pp. 1106 ff. DOI logo
Ajabshir, Zahra Fakher & Fatemeh Poorebrahim
2021. Assessing EFL learners’ written performance: The case of task repetition. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 39:3 ► pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Khezrlou, Sima
2021. Effects of task repetition with written corrective feedback on the knowledge and written accuracy of learners with different prior knowledge of the structure. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 464 ff. DOI logo
Khezrlou, Sima
2021. Effects of timing and availability of isolated FFI on learners’ written accuracy and fluency through task repetition. The Language Learning Journal 49:5 ► pp. 568 ff. DOI logo
Khezrlou, Sima
2025. Effects of task repetition with grammatizing on oral task performance and knowledge development. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 48:2 ► pp. 350 ff. DOI logo
Lázaro-Ibarrola, Amparo & María Ángeles Hidalgo
2021. Give me a second chance. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud
2020. Differential Effects of Strategic Planning and Task Structure on L2 Writing Outcomes. Reading & Writing Quarterly 36:4 ► pp. 320 ff. DOI logo
Levine, Glenn S.
2020. References. The Modern Language Journal 104:S1 ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Vidal, Karina & Scott Jarvis
2020. Effects of English-medium instruction on Spanish students’ proficiency and lexical diversity in English. Language Teaching Research 24:5 ► pp. 568 ff. DOI logo
Samuda, Virginia, Martin Bygate & Kris Van den Branden
2018. Introduction. In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Butler, Yuko Goto
2017. Motivational elements of digital instructional games: A study of young L2 learners’ game designs. Language Teaching Research 21:6 ► pp. 735 ff. DOI logo
Amiryousefi, Mohammad
2016. The differential effects of two types of task repetition on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency in computer-mediated L2 written production: a focus on computer anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning 29:5 ► pp. 1052 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Child L2 Writers [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 32], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue