Cover not available

In:Processing Perspectives on Task Performance
Edited by Peter Skehan
[Task-Based Language Teaching 5] 2014
► pp. 63–94

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 3. Task readiness

Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning, and proficiency levels

 | Hang Seng Management College, Hong Kong
Published online: 30 April 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.5.03gav
The construct of planning, operationalized as strategic planning, rehearsal and on-line planning (Ellis 2009), has been much studied in the task-based language teaching literature. These forms of planning could be thought of as task-external readiness in which extra preparatory time is provided for learners to focus their attention on certain performance areas. This chapter proposes a theoretical framework of task-readiness as an extension to planning so that task research in planning could broaden its horizons from a task-external perspective to also include a task-internal perspective, that is, familiarity with aspects of a task.To examine the relationship between task-external and task internal readiness, this study explores the effects of topic familiarity (task-internal readiness), strategic planning (task-external readiness), and proficiency levels (an individual difference) in a 2 × 2 × 2 split-plot factorial design. The results show that both topic familiarity and strategic planning promoted more fluent language, but strategic planning was a stronger form of task-readiness as indicated by its effect sizes. In contrast, topic familiarity induced more accurate performance from the participants, while planning was associated with significantly higher complexity. Proficiency seemed to be positively related to formal accuracy rather than to fluency as higher proficiency participants always scored higher in accuracy and sometimes in complexity, but not so much in fluency. These findings suggest that though task-internal readiness and task-external readiness share common factors in rendering assistance to learners, they differ in their influence on various performance areas as well as the magnitude of the effects. All this lends support to the differentiation between task-external and task-internal readiness, and to the notion of task-readiness as a contextualizing framework for relevant task research. Based on the theoretical discussion and empirical results, pedagogical implications are also outlined in this chapter.
References (61)
References
Baddeley, A. (1997). Human memory: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barry, S., & Lazarte, A. (1995). Embedded clause effects on recall: Does high prior knowledge of content domain overcome syntactic complexity in students of Spanish? Modern Language Journal, 79, 491–504. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banks, J. (2004). The impact of event familiarity on the complexity and coherence of children narratives of positive events. Unpublished MSc thesis. North Carolina State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bei, X.G. (2010). Exploring task-internal and task-external readiness: The effects of topic familiarity and strategic planning in topic-based task performance at different proficiency levels. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). Formality in second language discourse: Measurement and performance. Interdisciplinary Humanities, 28(1), 22–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Effects of immediate repetition in L2 speaking task: A focused study. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 11–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bui, H.Y.G. (In review). L2 fluency as influenced by content familiarity and planning performance and methodology. Submitted to Language Teaching Research.
. (In preparation). Lexical diversity, lexical sophistication and lexical density in L2 speaking tasks. Unpublished manuscript.
Bortfeld, H., Leon, S.D., Bloom, J.E., Schober, M.F., & Brennan, S.E. (2001). Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech, 44(2), 123–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bügel, K., & Buunk, B. (1996). Sex differences in foreign language text comprehension: The role of interests and prior knowledge. Modern Language Journal, 80, 15–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136–146). Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds). Researching pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.23–48). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bygate, M., & Samuda, V. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task repetition. In R. Ellis (ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, C. (2006). Effects of topic familiarity and linguistic difficulty on the reading strategies and mental representations of non-native readers of Chinese. Journal of Language and Learning, 4, 172–198.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, Y.F. (1999). Discourse topics and interlanguage variation. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Representation and process: Proceedings of the 3rd Pacific Second Language Research Forum (Vol. 1, pp. 235–241). Tokyo: PacSLRF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Q., & Donin, J. (1997). Discourse processing of first and second language biology texts: Effects of language proficiency and domain-specific knowledge. Modern Language Journal, 81, 209–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chiang, C.S., & Dunkel, P. (1992). The effect of speech modification, prior knowledge, and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 345–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dornyei, Z., & Katona, L. (1992). Validation of the C-test amongst Hungarian EFL learners. Language Testing, 9, 187–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 Oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F.Y. (2005). The effects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 167–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, P. (2001). Rules and routines: a consideration of their role in task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Teaching, learning and testing (pp. 75–97). Longman, London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354- 375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, R.C. (2001). Psychological statistics using SPSS for Windows. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Good, D.A., & Butterworth, B. (1980). Hesitancy as a conversational resource: some methodological implications. In H. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech production (pp. 145–152). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heylighen, F., & Dewaele, J. (1999). Formality of language: Definition, measurement and behavioral determinants. Internal report, Center “Leo Apostel”, Free University of Brussels.
Johnson, P. (1982). Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity and cultural background of text. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 169–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kawauchi, C. (2005). The effects of strategic planning on the oral narratives of learners with low and high intermediate proficiency. In R. Ellis. (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 143–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge of discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 92, 163–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, J.F. (1986). Background knowledge and L2 reading. Modern Language Journal, 70, 350–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, S.K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language learning, 57, 87–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leeser, M.J. (2004). The effects of topic familiarity, mode, and pausing on second language learnres’ comprehension and focus on form. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 587–615. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). Learner-based factors in L2 reading comprehension and processing grammatical form: Topic familiarity and working memory. Language Learning, 57(2), 229–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, D.R. (1990). What you don’t know can’t help you: An exploratory study of background knowledge and second language listening comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 65–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markham, P., & Latham, M. (1987). The influence of religious-specific background knowledge on the listening comprehension of adult second-language students. Language Learning, 37, 157–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merlo, S., & Mansur, L.L. (2004). Descriptive discourse: Topic familiarity and disfluencies. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 489–503. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohan, B.A. (1986). Language and Content. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2005). What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77–109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, L., Iwashita, N., Norris, J., & Rabie, S. (in preparation). A multi-language comparison of syntacticcomplexity measures and their relationships to foreign language proficiency. Manuscript in preparation.
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty and task production: exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, and M. Swain (Eds), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 119–140). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt-Rinehart, B.C. (1994). The effects of topic familiarity on second language listening comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 179–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shimoda, T.A. (1993). The effects of interesting examples and topic familiarity on text comprehension, attention, and reading speed. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 93–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). Lexical performance by native and non-native speakers on language learning tasks. In B. Richards, H.M. Daller, D. Malvern, P. Meara, J. Milton, J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition: the interface between theory and application (pp. 107–124). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research,1(3),185–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions in narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Strategic and online planning: the influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis. (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 193–216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis. (Ed), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–273). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thalheimer, W., & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research articles: A simplified methodology. Retrieved April 18, 2009 from [URL].
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D.M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological review, 80(5), 352–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-Line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Z. (2009). Modeling L2 Speech Production and Performance: Evidence from Five Types of Planning and Two Task Structures. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, G. (1997). An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language Testing, 14(1), 85–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (22)

Cited by 22 other publications

Khezrlou, Sima & Christiane Dalton-Puffer
2025. Pre-task planning in CLIL classrooms. Language Teaching for Young Learners DOI logo
Mostafaei Alaei, Mahnaz & Abbas Mansouri
2025. Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 63:2 ► pp. 995 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Jian, Xuyan Qiu & Lei Yang
2025. Unraveling the dynamics of English communicative motivation and self-efficacy through task-supported language teaching: a latent growth modeling perspective. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 63:1 ► pp. 367 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Mengnan
2025. How to Help Senior High School Students Overcome English Writing Anxiety in Continuation Task Teaching. Scientific Journal of Technology 7:4 ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud & Seyyed Ehsan Golparvar
2024. Cohesion in L2 writing: assessing the role of pre-task planning and topic familiarity through a task-readiness lens. The Language Learning Journal ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi & Seyyed Ehsan Golparvar
2024. The interplay of task repetition and task rehearsal in L2 written production across varied proficiency levels. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Skehan, Peter, Gavin Bui, Zhan Wang & Sabrina Shum
2024. Re-examining accuracy measures in second language task-based spoken performance. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 3:1 ► pp. 100098 ff. DOI logo
Garcia-Ponce, Edgar Emmanuell, M. Martha Lengeling, Irasema Mora-Pablo & Lisa Marie Conaway Arroyo
2023. Use of WhatsApp as a Platform to Promote English Oral Fluency and Accuracy: A Task Repetition Approach. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura 28:1 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Rezaei, Amir & Antonella Valeo
2023. Investigating the impact of task complexity on uptake and noticing of corrective feedback recasts. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:4 ► pp. 1271 ff. DOI logo
Bui, Gavin & Kevin W. H. Tai
2022. Revisiting functional adequacy and task-based language teaching in the GBA: insights from translanguaging. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 7:1 DOI logo
Qiu, Xuyan
2022. Picture or non-picture? The influence of narrative task types on lower- and higher-proficiency EFL learners’ oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:2 ► pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Qiu, Xuyan & Gavin Bui
2022. “We Are Responsive on Zoom, but…”. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 12:2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Qiu, Xuyan & Hong Cheng
2022. The effects of task types on L2 oral production and learner engagement. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:4 ► pp. 1063 ff. DOI logo
Suzuki, Noriko
2022. Effects of content-based instruction (CBI) on EFL secondary school learners’ writing. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 10:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Arredondo-Tapia, Daniela Itzé & Edgar Emmanuell Garcia-Ponce
2021. Role of Task Repetition and Content Familiarity in EFL Students’ Fluency and Accuracy in Narrative Tasks: A Case Study. Journal of Language and Education 7:2 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Bui, Gavin
2021. Influence of learners’ prior knowledge, L2 proficiency and pre-task planning on L2 lexical complexity. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:4 ► pp. 543 ff. DOI logo
Bui, Gavin & Rhett Yu
2021. Differentiating Task Repetition from Task Rehearsal. In Task-Based Language Teaching and Assessment, ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Qiu, Xuyan & Yuen Yi Lo
2017. Content familiarity, task repetition and Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in second language use. Language Teaching Research 21:6 ► pp. 681 ff. DOI logo
Pfenninger, Simone E & David Singleton
2016. Affect trumps age: A person-in-context relational view of age and motivation in SLA. Second Language Research 32:3 ► pp. 311 ff. DOI logo
Skehan, Peter
2015. Limited Attention Capacity and Cognition. In Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 8], ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Skehan, Peter
2022. Performance on second language speaking tasks. In Second Language Acquisition Theory [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 14], ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. Second Language Cognitive Task Complexity [Task-Based Language Teaching, 18], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue