In:Processing Perspectives on Task Performance
Edited by Peter Skehan
[Task-Based Language Teaching 5] 2014
► pp. 27–62
Chapter 2. On-line time pressure manipulations
L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions
Published online: 30 April 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.5.02wan
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.5.02wan
This chapter is concerned with an investigation of the underlying mechanisms of second language speaking. It reports on an experiment containing five different types of planning and repetition conditions, each relevant to certain processes and stages of speech production. The five conditions were two forms of strategic planning, two forms of on-line planning, and task repetition. Data were collected from 77 undergraduates (L1: Chinese and L2: English) doing a video narrative task in English. Speech samples were transcribed and coded. The study found: (1) strategic planning improved speech complexity and fluency, suggesting that support for the conceptualization stage in speech production helps language complexity and fluency; (2) on-line planning solely focusing on the formulation stage did not enhance speech complexity and accuracy, whereas on-line planning supported by an earlier opportunity to watch the video did, indicating a ‘meaning priority’ principle in speaking; (3) repetition enhanced speech complexity, fluency, and accuracy, suggesting that repetition is a robust way to improve speaking quality. Based on the results, an instructional model of L2 speech intervention is proposed. It argues that speech monitoring is the key to accuracy. Interventions at the speech formulation stage, which are often emphasized in pedagogy, work for accuracy only when speakers are instructed to attend to monitoring.
References (102)
Ahmadian, M.J., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, fluency, and complexity of EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15, 35–59.
Anderson, J.R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Anderson, J.R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M.D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036–1060.
. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208.
Bell, H. (2003). Using frequency lists to assess L2 texts. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Swansea.
Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In D. Willis & J. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 134–146). London: Heinemann.
. (1999). Task as context for the framing, reframing and unframing of language. System, 27(1), 33–48.
. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, et al. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Longman.
Bygate, M., & Samuda, V. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task-repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cortina, J.M., & Nouri, H. (2000). Effect size for ANOVA Designs. State University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07–129. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–83.
De Jong, N. & Perfetti, C.A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61, 533–568.
Dörnyei, Z., & Scott, M.L. (1997). Communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning, 47, 173–210.
Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–257). Cambridge: CUP.
Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474−507.
. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 1–20.
. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task-repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in l2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 474–509.
Foster, P. (1996). Doing the task better: How planning time influences students’ performance. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 126–135). Oxford: Heinemann.
. (2001). Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in the task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Longman.
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, J. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354−75.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–324.
. (1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching research, 3, 185–214.
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Álvarez-Torres, M.J., & Fernández-García, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49, 549–581.
Gilabert, R. (2007). Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. IRAL, 45, 215–240.
Guará-Tavares, M.G. (2008). Pre-task planning, working memory capacity and L2 speech performance. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473.
Hulstijn, J.H., & Hulstijn, W. (1984). Grammatical errors as a function of processing constraints and explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 34, 23–43.
Hunter, J.E., & Schmidt, F.L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kawauchi, C. (2005). The effects of strategic planning on the oral narratives of leaners with low and high intermediate L2 proficiency. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kello, C.T, & Plaut, D. (2003). Strategic control over rate of processing in word reading: A computational investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 207–232.
Kello, C.T. (2004). Control over the time course of cognition in the tempo-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 942–955.
Kello, C.T., & Plaut, D.C. (2000). Strategic control in word reading: Evidence from speeded responding in the tempo-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 719–750.
Kello, C., Plaut, D., & MacWhinney, B. (2000). The task-dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: An empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(3), 340–360.
Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201–258.
Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kroll, J.F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174.
Lashley, K.S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L.A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (pp. 112–146). New York, NY: Wiley.
Levelt, W.J.M, Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.
. (1993). Language use in normal speakers and its disorders. In G. Blanken, J. Dittmann, H. Grimm, J.C. Marshall, & C–W. Wallesch, (Eds.), Linguistic disorders and pathologies (pp. 1–15). Berlin: De Gruyter.
. (1999). Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). Oxford: OUP.
. (2001). Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 98(23), 13464–13471.
Long M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: CUP.
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2000). Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4, 221–50.
. (2001). Effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–118). Harlow: Longman.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (2002). Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19, 85–104.
Meara, P., & Bell, H. (2001). P_Lex: A simple and effective way of describing the lexical characteristics of short L2 texts. Prospect, 16(3), 5–19.
Meehl, P.E. (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66, 195–244.
Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83–108.
Meyer, D.E., & Gordon, P.C. (1985). Speech production: Motor programming of phonetic features. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 3–26.
Mochizuki, N., & Ortega, L. (2008). Balancing communication and grammar in beginning level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization, Language Teaching Research, 12, 11–37.
Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578.
. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528.
Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109–148.
Richards, B.J., & Malvern, D.D. (1998). A new research tool: Mathematical modelling in the measurement of vocabulary diversity (Award reference no. R000221995).
Final Report to the Economic and Social Research Council
, Swindon, UK.
Robinson, P. (1995). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45, 99–140.
Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249–284.
Sangarun, J. (2005). The effects of focusing on meaning and form in strategic planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 111–141). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sawaki, Y., Stricker, L.J., & Oranje, A.H. (2009). Factor structure of the TOEFL internet-based test. Language Testing, 26(1), 5–30.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
Schneider, W., & Chein, J.M. (2003). Controlled & automatic processing: Behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science, 27, 525–559.
Schriefers, H., Meyer, A.S., & Levelt, W.J.M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86–102.
Seidenberg, M.S. (1997). Language acquisition and use: Learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science, 275, 1599–1603.
Shiffrin, R.M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing, II: Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127–190.
. (2009a). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532.
. (2009b). Lexical performance by native and non-native speakers on language-learning tasks. In H. Daller, D. Malvern, P. Meara, J. Milton, B. Richards, & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition: The interface between theory and application (pp. 107–124). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). The influence of planning and post-task activities on accuracy and complexity in task-based learning. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 16–33.
. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49, 93–120.
. (2005). Strategic and online planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 193–218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2008). Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A meta-analysis of the Ealing research. In S. Van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard, & I. Vedder, (Eds.), Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language use, learning and teaching (pp. 263–284). Brussels: Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and Arts.
Skehan, P., Bei, X., Li, Q., & Wang, Z. (2012). The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 16(3), 170–187.
Tajima, M. (2003). The effects of planning on oral performance of Japanese as a foreign language. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University.
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58, 439–473.
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239–276). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ullman, M.T. (2001a). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(1), 37–69.
. (2001b). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(1), 105–122.
. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1–2), 231–270.
. (2008). The role of memory systems in disorders of language. In B. Stemmer & H.A. Whitaker (Eds.), Handbook of the neuroscience of language (pp. 189–198). Oxford: Elsevier.
Ullman, M.T., Pancheva, R., Love, T., Yee, E., Swinney, D., & Hickok, G. (2005). Neural correlates of lexicon and grammar: Evidence from the production, reading, and judgment of inflection in aphasia. Brain and Language, 93(2), 185–238.
VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to content and form in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287–301.
Wendel, J. (1997). Planning and second language narrative production. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Temple University, Japan.
Wigglesworth, G. (1997). An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language Testing, 14, 85–106.
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The Effects of pre-task planning and online planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 monologicoral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1–2.
Cited by (68)
Cited by 68 other publications
Guo, Jiali & Kazuya Saito
Aubrey, Scott & Andrew Philpott
Jung, Jookyoung
Khezrlou, Sima & Christiane Dalton-Puffer
Lu, Jinmiao, Qing Ma & Shaofeng Li
Luo, Xinran & Peijian Paul Sun
Mansouri, Mohammad Reza, Mansoor Tavakoli & Zahra Amirian
Mostafaei Alaei, Mahnaz & Abbas Mansouri
Rogers, John & Peilin Li
Róg, Tomasz
Vásquez Fernández, Claudia
Yamaoka, Koichi & Osamu Takeuchi
Aaj, Ali, Parviz Maftoon & Masood Siyyari
Albarqi, Ghadah
Gu, Qianqian & Kris Van den Branden
Hunter, Ann‐Marie
Róg, Tomasz & Marek Krawiec
2024. Task repetition and L2 grit. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 4:2 ► pp. 241 ff.
Takase, Nami
Cavicchio, Federica & Maria Grazia Busà
Duong, Phuong-Thao, Maribel Montero Perez, Long-Quoc Nguyen, Piet Desmet & Elke Peters
Hassanzadeh-Taleshi, Mobin, Baqer Yaqubi & Hossein Bozorgian
Ryan, Jonathon, Pauline Foster, Anthea Fester, Yi Wang, Jenny Field, Celine Kearney & Jia Rong Yap
Sobhanifar, Hadi & Fatemeh Ranjbaran
Xing, Jiaxin
Aubrey, Scott, Craig Lambert & Paul Leeming
Farahanynia, Mahsa & Mohammad Khatib
Feng, Ruiling
Johnson, Mark D & Mahmoud Abdi Tabari
Qin, Jie & Yan Zhang
Qiu, Xuyan & Gavin Bui
Terres, Mariana Lima, Marilia Camponogara Torres & Ana Flávia Boeing Marcelino
Mohammad Javad Ahmadian & Michael H. Long
Bui, Gavin
Bui, Gavin & Rhett Yu
Gu, Qianqian
2021. Impact of task preparedness on L2 oral performance and strategy use. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 1:2 ► pp. 196 ff.
Lambert, Craig, Scott Aubrey & Paul Leeming
Qiu, Xuyan
Qiu, Xuyan
van Batenburg, Eline, Ron Oostdam, Amos van Gelderen, Ruben Fukkink & Nivja de Jong
2020. The effects of instructional focus and task type on pre-vocational learners’ ability in EFL oral interaction. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 171:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
van Batenburg, Eline SL, Ron J Oostdam, Amos JS van Gelderen, Ruben G Fukkink & Nivja H de Jong
York, James
Choi, Ikkyu, Mikyung Kim Wolf, Emilie Pooler, Lorraine Sova & Molly Faulkner-Bond
D’Ely, Raquel, Mailce Borges Mota & Martin Bygate
2019. Strategic planning and repetition as metacognitive processes in task performance. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 199 ff.
Ellis, Rod
2019. Task preparedness. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 15 ff.
Ellis, Rod, Peter Skehan, Shaofeng Li, Natsuko Shintani & Craig Lambert
Khoram, Alireza & Zuochen Zhang
Lambert, Craig
2019. Task-induced second language development. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 279 ff.
Lambert, Craig & Sachiko Nakamura
LAMBERT, CRAIG & GRACE ZHANG
Xing, Jiaxin & Shaoqian Luo
2019. The effects of reasoning demands on Chinese EFL learners’ oral performance and cognitive processes. In Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 13], ► pp. 153 ff.
Bui, Gavin & Zeping Huang
Bui, Gavin & Peter Skehan
Bui, Gavin, Peter Skehan & Zhan Wang
Sadeghi, Karim & Farah Ghaderi
Wang, Zhan & Gaowei Chen
2018. Discourse performance in L2 task repetition. In Learning Language through Task Repetition [Task-Based Language Teaching, 11], ► pp. 97 ff.
Butler, Yuko Goto
Butler, Yuko Goto
Lambert, Craig, Judit Kormos & Danny Minn
Qiu, Xuyan & Yuen Yi Lo
Thai, Chau & Frank Boers
Skehan, Peter
2015. Limited Attention Capacity and Cognition. In Domains and Directions in the Development of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 8], ► pp. 123 ff.
Skehan, Peter
2016. Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes. In Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and Acquisition [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 3], ► pp. 17 ff.
Skehan, Peter
Skehan, Peter
Skehan, Peter
2022. Performance on second language speaking tasks. In Second Language Acquisition Theory [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 14], ► pp. 211 ff.
Skehan, Peter
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
