In:Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance
Edited by Peter Robinson
[Task-Based Language Teaching 2] 2011
► pp. 175–202
Chapter 7. Task complexity, modified output, and L2 development in learner–learner interaction
Published online: 13 September 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2.13ch7
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2.13ch7
This chapter examines the effects of task complexity [± reasoning demands] on modified output and the relationship between output modifications and L2 development. Seventy-nine adult English as a Second Language learners were divided into two groups: (1) low reasoning demands; and (2) high reasoning demands; and engaged in two sets of tasks which targeted English past tense and locative prepositions. While learners modified their output using a variety of modification moves, learners who completed high complexity tasks produced more self-repair than those who completed the low complexity ones. Self-repair was related to learning locatives for the high complexity group only as measured by delayed grammaticality judgment and oral post-tests. Pushed output, as well as the total amount of modified output, was related to learning past tense for the low complexity group only as measured by delayed grammaticality judgment post-tests. These findings are discussed in light of the Cognition Hypothesis and show an intricate pattern among level of task complexity, type of target structure, type of modified output, and learning.
Cited by (24)
Cited by 24 other publications
Riordan, Elaine
Riordan, Elaine
Gomez Laich, Maria Pia & Naoko Taguchi
Gomez-Laich, María Pía & Naoko Taguchi
2018. Task complexity effects on interaction during a collaborative persuasive writing task. In Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics [Task-Based Language Teaching, 10], ► pp. 83 ff.
Ren, Wei, Yiman Wu & Yuchen Peng
Ayedoun, Emmanuel & Masataka Tokumaru
Qiu, Xuyan & Hong Cheng
Márquez, Daniel & Júlia Barón
2021. Effects of task complexity on L2 suggestions. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 1:2 ► pp. 227 ff.
Malicka, Aleksandra
Goo, Jaemyung
Dao, Phung, Pavel Trofimovich & Sara Kennedy
2018. Structural alignment in L2 task-based interaction. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 169:2 ► pp. 293 ff.
Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura
2017. Instructor individual characteristics and L2 interaction. In Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 16], ► pp. 151 ff.
Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura, Avizia Yim Long & Megan Solon
Payant, Caroline & Rachel Bright
Solon, Megan, Avizia Y. Long & Laura Gurzynski-Weiss
Baralt, Melissa, Laura Gurzynski-Weiss & YouJin Kim
2016. 8. Engagement with the language. In Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 45], ► pp. 209 ff.
García Mayo, Maria del Pilar & Ainara Imaz Agirre
Kim, YouJin
Kim, YouJin
KIM, YOUJIN & NAOKO TAGUCHI
Adams, Rebecca & Nik Aloesnita Nik Mohd Alwi
2014. Chapter 3. Prior knowledge and second language task production in text chat. In Technology-mediated TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 6], ► pp. 51 ff.
Trofimovich, Pavel, Kim Mcdonough & Heike Neumann
Gurzynski‐Weiss, Laura & Andrea Révész
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
