In:Broadening the Horizon of TBLT: Plenary addresses from the second decade of the International Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching
Edited by Martin East
[Task-Based Language Teaching 17] 2025
► pp. 183–211
Chapter 10How a processability perspective frames the potential of tasks in instructed second language acquisition
Published online: 24 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.17.10len
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.17.10len
Abstract
Processability Theory (PT) focuses on the nature of second language (L2) learners’ processing
capacities to clarify the obstacles, achievements, and (some) systematic aspects of variation in L2 learning. In this
chapter, I show that a processability perspective on tasks can contribute to our understanding of how both the
universal and individual features of L2 development can be recognised in learners’ speech. I investigate speech
samples of different learners completing the same task at different points in their language development and explore:
(1) their use of different linguistic structures reflecting their developmental stage; (2) the variation in their use
of linguistic structures at the same developmental stage; and (3) the variability in the vocabulary of different
semantic domains covered by the learners. I show that a PT perspective on tasks in second language acquisition can
empower teachers to nuance the design of learning activities to take account of different learning needs.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Theoretical background: Processability Theory
- PT explains L2 developmental stages
- PT explains learner variation within developmental stages
- The Steadiness Hypothesis
- Tasks and developmental stages
- The Martian task
- Development and variation in the Martian task: Morphology & syntax
- Development Stage 2 learners
- Development Stage 3 learners
- Development Stage 5 learners
- Learner variation: Stage 4 learners
- Semantic domains addressed in the Martian task
- The data
- Semantic domains in the Martian task: Overview of results
- Semantic domains: Stage 2 learners
- Semantic domains: Stage 3 learners
- Semantic domains: Stage 4 learners
- Semantic domains: Stage 5 learners
- Conclusion
Acknowledgements Note References
References (43)
(1998). Language
testing — SLA research interfaces: An
update. In L. F. Bachman & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces
between second language acquisition and language testing
research (pp. 193–209). Cambridge University Press.
Clahsen, H. (1980). Psycholinguistic
aspects of L2 acquisition. In S. W. Felix (Ed.), Second
language development: Trends and
issues (pp. 57–79). Narr.
Di Biase, B. (2002). Focusing
strategies in second language development: A classroom-based study of Italian L2 in primary
school. In B. Di Biase (Ed.), Developing
a second language: Acquisition, processing and pedagogy of Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese,
Swedish (pp. 95–120). Language Australia.
(2008). Focus-on-form
and development in L2 learning. In J.-U. Keßler (Ed.), Processability
approaches to second language development and second language
learning (pp. 197–219). Cambridge Scholars.
Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1974). Natural
sequences in child second language acquisition. Language
Learning 24, 37–53.
Dyson, B. (2021). Dynamic
variation in second language acquisition. John Benjamins.
Ellis, R. (1988). The
effects of the linguistic environment on the second language acquisition of grammatical
rules. Applied
Linguistics, 9(3), 257–274.
(2009). Task-based
language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of
Applied
Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246.
García Mayo, M. P. (2018). Focused
versus unfocused tasks. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The
TESOL encyclopedia of English language
teaching (pp. 1–5). Wiley.
Guariento, W., & Morley, J. (2001). Text
and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. English Language Teaching
Journal, 55(4), 347–353.
Hulstijn, J. H., Ellis, R., & Eskildsen, S. W. (2015). Orders
and sequences in the acquisition of l2 morphosyntax, 40 years on: An introduction to the Special
Issue. Language
Learning, 65(1), 1–5.
Keßler, J.-U. (2008). Communicative
tasks and second language profiling: Linguistic and pedagogical
implications. In J. Eckerth & S. Siepmann (Eds.), Research
on task-based language learning and teaching. Theoretical, methodological and pedagogical
perspectives (pp. 291–310). Peter Lang.
Keßler, J.-U., & Liebner, M. (2016). Diagnosing
L2-English in the communicative EFL classroom: A task-based approach to individual and developmentally
moderated focus on form in a meaning-focused
setting. In J. Keßler, A. Lenzing, & M. Liebner (Eds.), Developing,
modelling and assessing second
languages (pp. 193–205). John Benjamins.
Keßler, J.-U., Liebner, M., & Mansouri, F. (2011). Teaching. In M. Pienemann & J.-U. Keßler (Eds.), Studying
processability
theory (pp. 148–155). John Benjamins.
Lenzing, A. (2013). The
development of the grammatical system in early second language acquisition. The multiple constraints
hypothesis. John Benjamins.
(2015). Exploring
regularities and dynamic systems in L2 development. Language
Learning, 65(1), 89–122.
Lenzing, A., Nicholas, H., & Roos, J. (2019). Contextualising issues in processability theory. In A. Lenzing, H. Nicholas, & J. Roos (Eds.), Widening contexts for processability theory: Theories and issues (pp. 1–8). John Benjamins.
Lenzing, A. (2021). The
production-comprehension interface in second language acquisition: An integrated encoding-decoding
model. Bloomsbury Academic.
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus
on form: A design feature in language teaching
methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign
language research in cross-cultural
perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins.
(2000). Focus
on form in task-based language teaching. In D. Richard, & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language
policy and pedagogy. Essays in honour of A. Ronald Walton
Lambert (pp. 179–192). John Benjamins.
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three
approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL
Quarterly, 26(1), 27–56.
Mackey, A. (1994). Targeting
morpho-syntax in children’s ESL: An empirical study of the use of interactive goal-based
tasks. Working Papers in Educational
Linguistics, 10(1), 67–91. [URL]
Meisel, J., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M. (1981). On
determining developmental sequences in natural second language
acquisition. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 3(2), 109–135.
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language
processing and second language development. Processability theory. John Benjamins.
Pienemann, M., & Lenzing, A. (2020). Processability
theory. In B. VanPatten, G. D. Keating, & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories
in second language acquisition. An
introduction (pp. 162–191). Routledge.
Pienemann, M., & Mackey, A. (1993). An
empirical study of children’s ESL development and Rapid
Profile. In P. McKay (Ed.). ESL
development. Language and literacy in schools.
Volume 2 (pp.115–259). Commonwealth of Australia and National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.
Ravem, R. (1968). Language
acquisition in a second language environment. International Review of Applied
Linguistics, 6(1), 165–185.
Roos, J. (2016). Acquisition
as a gradual process: Second language development in the EFL
classroom. In J.-U. Keßler, A. Lenzing, & M. Liebner (Eds.), Developing,
modelling and assessing second
languages (pp. 121–134) John Benjamins.
(2019). Exploiting
the potential of tasks for targeted language learning in the EFL
classroom. In A. Lenzing, H. Nicholas, & J. Roos (Eds.), Widening
contexts for processability theory: Theories and
issues (pp. 285–300). John Benjamins.
Tarone, E. (1985). Variability
in interlanguage use: A study of style-shifting in morphology and
syntax. Language
Learning, 35(3), 373–403.
(2000). Still
wrestling with ‘context’ in interlanguage theory. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 20, 182–198.
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. M. (Eds.). (2009). Task-based
language teaching: A reader. John Benjamins.
VanPatten, B., Williams, J., Keating, G. D., & Wulff, S. (2020). Introduction.
The nature of theories. In B. VanPatten, G. D. Keating, & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories
in second language acquisition. An introduction (3rd
ed., pp. 1–18). Routledge.
