In:Broadening the Horizon of TBLT: Plenary addresses from the second decade of the International Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching
Edited by Martin East
[Task-Based Language Teaching 17] 2025
► pp. 164–182
Chapter 9Reflecting on task-based language teaching from an Instructed SLA perspective
Published online: 24 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.17.09spa
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.17.09spa
Abstract
Task-based language teaching (TBLT) and instructed second language acquisition (ISLA) have much in
common in terms of theory, research, and educational relevance. The distinguishing characteristic between the two is
that TBLT adopts communicative tasks as the central unit for instruction and assessment, whereas ISLA comprises a
broader range of instructional activities and assessment practices. In this presentation, I focus on two of the
conference themes: Instruction and Outcomes. With respect to Instruction, I draw attention to the pedagogical timing
of form-focused instruction (FFI) and corrective feedback. I discuss relevant studies within ISLA and TBLT and argue
that TBLT is particularly well-suited to investigating questions about the timing of FFI. In discussing Outcomes, I
consider differences in how outcomes are measured in TBLT (i.e., performance) and ISLA (i.e., development) and the
different aspects of language examined within each, for example, accuracy, implicit/explicit knowledge in ISLA and
complexity, accuracy, and fluency in TBLT. I discuss underlying similarities between fluency and implicit knowledge,
how they are measured, and propose research to investigate the pedagogical timing of FFI in relation to fluency
development. I conclude with a brief discussion of the need for a balance between theoretically and pedagogically
motivated research within ISLA and TBLT.
Article outline
- Introduction
- TBLT and ISLA
- Instruction
- Timing of instruction
- Timing of CF
- Outcomes
- Theory, research, and pedagogy
- Conclusion
Notes References
References (97)
Akakura, M. (2012). Evaluating
the effectiveness of explicit instruction on implicit and explicit L2
knowledge. Language Teaching
Research, 16(1), 9–37.
Andon, N., & Eckerth, J. (2009). Chacun
à son gout? Task-based pedagogy from the teacher’s point of view. International
Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 19(3), 286–310.
Baralt, M. (2018). Becoming
a task-based teacher educator: A case study. In V. Samuda, K. Van den Branden, & M. Bygate (Eds.), TBLT
as a researched
pedagogy (pp. 23–50). John Benjamins.
Barrot, J. (2014). Combining
isolated and integrated form-focused instruction: Effects on productive
skills. Language, Culture, and
Curriculum, 27(3), 278–293.
Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating
dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing
framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory &
Cognition, 15(4), 657–668.
Borg, S. (2009). English
language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied
Linguistics, 30(3), 358–88.
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining
and operationalizing L2 complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions
of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in
SLA (pp. 21–46). John Benjamins.
Bygate, M. (2005). Applied
linguistics: A pragmatic discipline, a generic discipline? Applied
Linguistics, 26(4), 568–581.
(2020). Some
directions for the possible survival of TBLT as a real-world project. Language
Teaching, 53(3), 275–288.
de Jong, N. H., & Wempe, T. (2009). Praat
script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate
automatically. Behavior Research
Methods, 41, 385–390.
DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond
focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language
grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus
on form in classroom second language
acquisition (pp. 42–63). Cambridge University Press.
(2005). What
makes learning second language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language
Learning, 55(S1), 1–25.
(2007). Skill
acquisition theory. In B. Van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories
in second language
acquisition (pp. 97–114). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed
SLA: Constraints, compensation, and
enhancement. In C. Doughty, & M. Long (Eds.), The
handbook of second language
acquisition (pp. 256–310). Blackwell.
Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative
focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus
on form in classroom second language
acquisition (pp. 114–138). Cambridge University Press.
East, M. (2012). Task-based
language teaching from the teachers’ perspective: Insights from New
Zealand. John Benjamins.
(2018). How
do beginning teachers conceptualise and enact tasks in school foreign language
classrooms? In V. Samuda, K. Van den Branden, & M. Bygate (Eds.), TBLT
as a researched
pedagogy (pp. 23–50). John Benjamins.
Elgün-Gündüz, Z., Akcan, S., & Bayyurt, Y. (2012). Isolated
form-focused instruction and integrated form-focused instruction in primary school classrooms in
Turkey. Language, Culture and
Curriculum, 25(2), 157–171.
Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based
research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching
Research, 4(3), 193–220.
(2010). Second
language acquisition, teacher education and language pedagogy. Language
Teaching, 43(2), 182–201.
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (2009). Implicit
and explicit knowledge in second language learning: Testing and
teaching. Multilingual Matters.
File, K. A., & Adams, R. (2010). Should
vocabulary instruction be integrated or isolated? TESOL
Quarterly, 44(2), 222–249.
Foster, P., & Wigglesworth, G. (2016). Capturing
accuracy in second language performance: the case for a weighted clause
ratio. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 36, 98–116.
García Mayo, M. P. (2015). The
interface between task-based language teaching and content-based
instruction. System, 54, 1–3.
Goo, J., Granena, G., Yilmaz, Y., & Novella, M. (2015). Implicit
and explicit instruction in L2 learning. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit
and explicit learning of
languages (pp. 443–482). John Benjamins.
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). (Eds.). Dimensions
of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in
SLA. John Benjamins.
Jiang, N. (2007). Selective
integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language
Learning, 57(1), 1–33.
Kang, E. Y., Sok, S., & Han, Z. H. (2018). Thirty-five
years of ISLA on form-focused instruction: A methodological synthesis. Language
Teaching
Research, 23(4), 403–427.
Lambert, C., & Kormos, J. (2014). Complexity,
accuracy, and fluency in task-based l2 research: Toward more developmentally based measures of second language
acquisition. Applied
Linguistics, 35(5), 607–614.
Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2013). Keystroke
logging in writing research: Using Inputlog to analyze and visualize writing
processes. Written
Communication, 30, 358–392.
Li, S. (2010). The
effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language
Learning, 60(2), 309–365.
Li, S., Zhu, Y., & Ellis, R. (2016). The
effects of the timing of corrective feedback on the acquisition of a new linguistic
structure. The Modern Language
Journal, 100(1), 276–295.
Long, M. H. (1996). The
role of the linguistic environment in second language
acquisition. In W. Ritchie, & T. Bahtia (Eds.), Handbook
of second language
acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
Lyster, R. (2019). Making
research on instructed SLA relevant for teachers through professional
development. Language Teaching
Research, 23(4), 494–513.
Lyster, R., Collins, L., & Ballinger, S. (2009). Linking
languages through a bilingual read-aloud project. Language
Awareness, 18(3–4), 366–383.
Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral
feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302. [URL].
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral
corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language
Teaching, 46(1), 1–40.
Mackey, A. (1999). Input,
interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in
ESL. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 21(4), 557–587. [URL].
Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction
research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research
synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational
interaction and second language
acquisition (pp. 407–452). Oxford University Press.
McDaniel, M., Robinson, B., & Einstein, P. (1998). Prospective
remembering: Perceptually driven or conceptually driven processes? Memory &
Cognition, 26, 121–134.
McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W. (2007). Teachers’
and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL
Quarterly, 41(1), 107–132.
Michel, M. (2017). Complexity,
accuracy and fluency (CAF). In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of instructed second language
acquisition (pp. 50–68). Routledge.
Morris, D. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels
of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal
Learning and Verbal
Behavior, 16(5), 519–533.
Müller-Hartmann, A., & Schocker, M. (2011). Teaching
English. Task-supported language
learning. Schöningh.
(2018). The
challenges of integrating focus on form within tasks: Findings from a classroom research project in secondary
EFL classrooms. In V. Samuda, K. Van den Branden, & M. Bygate (Eds.), TBLT
as a researched
pedagogy (pp. 97–130). John Benjamins.
Nguyen, B. T., Newton, J., & Crabbe, D. (2018). Teacher
transformation of textbook tasks in Vietnamese EFL high school
classrooms. In V. Samuda, K. Van den Branden, & M. Bygate (Eds.), TBLT
as a researched
pedagogy (pp. 51–70). John Benjamins.
Nikula, T. (2015). Hands-on
tasks in CLIL science classrooms as sites for subject-specific language use and
learning. System, 54, 14–27.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness
of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative
meta-analysis. Language
Learning, 50(3), 417–528.
(2009). Towards
an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of
complexity. Applied
Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578.
Oliver, R., & Bogachenko, T. (2018). Teacher
perceptions and use of tasks in school ESL
classrooms. In V. Samuda, K. Van den Branden, & M. Bygate (Eds.), TBLT
as a researched
pedagogy (pp. 71–96). John Benjamins.
Ortega, L. (2012). Language
acquisition research for language teaching: Choosing between application and
relevance. In Hinger, B., Unterrainer, E. M., & Newby, D. (Eds.), Sprachen
lernen: Kompetenzen entwickeln–Performanzen
(über)prüfen (pp. 24–38). Präsens Verlag.
Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF:
Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied
Linguistics, 30(4), 590–601.
Plonsky, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). Task-based
learner production: A substantive and methodological review. Annual Review of
Applied
Linguistics, 36, 73–97.
Quinn, P. (2014). Delayed
versus immediate corrective feedback on orally produced passive errors in
English [Unpublished doctoral
dissertation]. University of Toronto, Toronto.
Quinn, P., & Nakata, T. (2017). The
timing of oral corrective feedback. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective
feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications,
implications (pp. 35–47). Routledge.
Révész, A., Ekiert, M., & Torgersen, E. N. (2016). The
effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task
performance. Applied
Linguistics, 37(6), 828–848.
Robinson, P. (2001). Task
complexity, task difficulty, and task productions: Exploring interactions in a componential
framework. Applied
Linguistics, 22(1), 27–57.
Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). Corrective
feedback makes a difference: A meta-analysis of the
research. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing
research on language learning and
teaching (pp. 134–164). John Benjamins.
Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding
relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the
teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching
pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and
testing (pp. 119–140). Pearson Education.
Samuda, V., Van den Branden, K., & Bygate, M. (2018). TBLT
as a researched pedagogy. John Benjamins.
Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness
and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 13, 206–226.
Schwartz, B. (1993). On
explicit and-negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic
behavior. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 15(2), 147–163.
Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning
teaching: A guidebook for English language teachers. Macmillan Education.
Shiu, L. J., Yalçın, S., & Spada, N. (2018). Exploring
second language learners’ grammaticality judgment performance in relation to task design
features. System, 72, 215–225.
(2009). Modelling
second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and
lexis. Applied
Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532.
(2015). Limited
attention capacity and cognition: Two hypotheses regarding second language performance on
tasks. In Bygate, M. (Ed.), Domains
and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international
conference (pp. 123–156). John Benjamins.
Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused
instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory
research. Language
Teaching, 30(2),73–87.
(2015). SLA
research and L2 pedagogy: Misapplications and questions of relevance. Language
Teaching, 48(1), 69–81.
(2022). SLA
research and language education: An uneasy
relationship. In C. Bardel, C. Hedman, K. Rejman, & E. Zetterholm (Eds.), Exploring
language education. Global and local
perspectives (pp. 14–37). Stockholm University Press.
Spada, N., Jessop, L., Suzuki, W., Tomita, Y., & Valeo, A. (2014). Isolated
and integrated form-focused instruction: Effects on different types of L2
knowledge. Language Teaching
Research, 18(4), 453–473.
Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1999). Instruction,
L1 influence and developmental “readiness” in second language acquisition. The
Modern Language
Journal, 83(1), 1–22.
(2008). Form-focused
instruction: Isolated or Integrated? TESOL
Quarterly, 42(2), 181–207. [URL].
(2013). Instructed
SLA. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), The
Routledge encyclopedia of second language
acquisition (pp. 319–327). Routledge.
(2019). In
it together: Teachers, researchers, and classroom SLA. Plenary presented
at the American Association for Applied
Linguistics, Atlanta, USA.
Spada, N., Shiu, L. J., & Tomita, Y. (2015). Validating
an elicited imitation task as a measure of implicit knowledge: Comparisons with other validation
studies. Language
Learning, 65(3), 723–751.
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions
between type of instruction and type of language feature: A
meta-analysis. Language
Learning, 60(2), 263–308.
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2015). The
interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in
cognitive aptitudes. Language
Learning, 67(4), 860–895.
Tavakoli, P., Campbell, C., & McCormack, J. (2015). Development
of speech fluency over a short period of time: Effects of pedagogic
intervention. TESOL
Quarterly, 50(2), 1–25.
Tedick, D. J., & Lyster, R. (2020). Scaffolding
language development in immersion and dual language
classrooms. Routledge.
Tedick, D. J., & Zilmer, C. (2018). Teacher
perceptions of immersion professional development experiences emphasizing language-focused content
education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based
Instruction, 6(2), 269–294.
Tonkyn, A. (2012). Measuring
and perceiving changes in oral complexity, accuracy and
fluency. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions
of L2 performance and
proficiency (pp. 221–245). John Benjamins.
Vafaee, P., & Kachisnke, I. (2017). Validating
grammaticality judgment tests: Evidence from two new psycholinguistic
measures. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 39, 59–95. [URL].
Valeo, A., & Spada, N. (2015). Is
there a better time to focus on form? Teacher and learner views. TESOL
Quarterly, 50(2), 314–339.
Van den Branden, K. (2006). Task-based
language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
(2009). Mediating
between predetermined order and complete chaos: The role of the teacher in task-based language
education. International Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 19(3), 264–285.
(2015). Task-based
language education: From theory to practice … and back
again. In Bygate, M. (Ed.), Domains
and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international
conference (pp. 303–320). John Benjamins.
