In:Broadening the Horizon of TBLT: Plenary addresses from the second decade of the International Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching
Edited by Martin East
[Task-Based Language Teaching 17] 2025
► pp. 101–122
Chapter 6“It takes a village”
Developing and maintaining sustainable TBLT curricula
Published online: 24 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.17.06kim
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.17.06kim
Abstract
Over the last three decades, the field of task-based language teaching (TBLT) has expanded
significantly in terms of research topics, research methods, and practical applications to language teaching (Ahmadian & Long, 2022). For instance, by adapting several aspects of
second language acquisition (SLA) research methods, an increasing amount of research has examined various task design
and implementation features as well as task-based language performance and development (Ellis et al., 2020). However, several “real issues” in TBLT still remain (Long, 2016), including research-informed TBLT curriculum development,
task-based assessment, researcher-practitioner collaborations, and in-service teacher education. In this chapter, I
focus on one of the issues in TBLT that goes beyond individual task design and addresses concerns regarding course and
program curricular development. I first review the research trends in TBLT curricula design and
introduce four TBLT curricular design collaboration models. I argue that in order to implement and systematize TBLT
curricula in language programs, a collaborative endeavor involving a collection of stakeholders is needed — that is,
it takes a village to establish sustainable TBLT curricula.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Research reporting TBLT curricular development
- Cases of different collaborative models for TBLT program implementation
- Teacher as a single village member with a TBLT expert’s guidance
- Institution as policy implementer of TBLT but with a lack of resources for curricular updates
- Ambassadors as continuous TBLT implementers with institutional support
- Multiple village members as TBLT actualizers with institutional support
- Innovation in education: Suggestions for developing sustainable TBLT curricula
- Ensure policy makers’ involvement
- Break down the walls among various stakeholders
- Make resources available for all stakeholders through community efforts
- Prioritize teamwork with TBLT ambassadors over time
- Relying on TBLT ambassadors for sustainability of curriculum
- Suggested model for developing and implementing sustainable TBLT curricula
- Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (38)
* indicates the studies that were included in the research synthetic review.
Ahmadian, M. J., & Long, M. H. (Eds.). (2022). The
Cambridge handbook of task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
*Baralt, M., Fei, W., Bu, Z., Chen, H., Gómez, J. M., & Luan, X. (2022). The
implementation of a task-based Spanish-language program in Qingdao, China: A case
study. In M. J. Ahmadian & M. H. Long (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of task-based language
teaching (pp. 135–150). Cambridge University Press.
Boers, F., & Faez, F. (2023). Meta-analysis
to estimate the relative effectiveness of TBLT programs: Are we there
yet? Language Teaching Research.
Borg, S. (2015). Teacher
cognition and language education: Research and practice. Bloomsbury Academic.
*Bryfonski, L. (2022). Connecting
teacher training to TBLT implementation: A case study of pre-service teachers in Honduran bilingual
schools. In M. J. Ahmadian & M. H. Long (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of task-based language
teaching (pp. 463–477). Cambridge University Press.
Bryfonski, L., & McKay, T. H. (2019). TBLT
implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching
Research, 23(5), 603–632.
*Campbell, C., MacPherson, S., & Sawkins, T. (2014). Preparing
students for education, work, and community: Activity theory in task-based curriculum
design. TESL Canada
Journal, 31(8), 68–92.
Carless, D. (2013). Innovation
in language teaching and learning. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The
encyclopedia of applied
linguistics, 1–4. Blackwell.
*Chaudron, C., Doughty, C. J., Kim, Y., Kong, D., Lee, J., Lee, Y., Long, M. H., Rivers, R., & Urano, K. (2005). A
task-based needs analysis of a tertiary Korean as a foreign language
program. In M. Long (Ed.), Second
language needs
analysis (pp. 225–261). Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based
language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Fullan, M., & Park, P. B. (1981). Curriculum
implementation: A resource booklet. Ontario Ministry of Education.
*González-Lloret, M., & Nielson, K. B. (2015). Evaluating
TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching
Research, 19(5), 525–549.
*Gurzynski-Weiss, L., Giacomino, L., & Jarrett, D. (2022). Examining
high-school learners’ experience of task motivation and difficulty in a two-week Spanish immersion
camp. In M. J. Ahmadian & M. H. Long (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of task-based language
teaching (pp. 566–584). Cambridge University Press.
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., Wray, M., Coulter-Kern, M., & Bernardo, J. (2024). Task-based
elementary Spanish in rural Indiana: A practice-based collaboration. Studies in
Second Language Learning and
Teaching, 14(1), 121–147.
Kim, Y. (2015). The
role of tasks as vehicles for learning in classroom
interaction. In N. Markee (Ed.), Handbook
of classroom discourse and
interaction (pp. 163–181). Wiley-Blackwell.
Kim, Y., Choi, B., Kang, S., Kim, B., & Yun, H. (2020). Comparing
the effects of direct and indirect synchronous written corrective feedback: Learning outcomes and students’
perceptions. Foreign Language
Annals, 53(1), 176–199.
Kim, Y., Choi, B., Kang, S., Yun, H., & Kim, B. (2017, April 19–21). TBLT
might not work with low-level foreign language learners taught by novice teachers: Overcoming the challenges
for the better [Conference presentation]. 4th
International Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching: Tasks in
Context, Barcelona, Spain.
Kim, Y., Choi, B., Yun, H., Kim, B., & Choi, S. (2022). Task
repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of Korean: A classroom-based
study. Language Teaching
Research. 26, 1106–1132.
Kim, Y., Choi, B., Yun, H., Kim, B., & Kang, S. (2021). Learning
Korean through tasks: High beginner to low intermediate. Kong & Park Publishing.
*Kim, Y., Jung, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2017). Implementation
of a localized task-based course in an EFL context: A study of students’ evolving
perceptions. TESOL
Quarterly, 51(3), 632–660.
Kim, Y., Kang, S., Yun, H., Kim, B., & Choi, B. (2020). The
role of task repetition in a Korean as a foreign language classroom: Writing quality, attention to form, and
learning of Korean grammar. Foreign Language
Annals, 53(1), 827–849.
*Lai, C., & Lin, X. (2015). Strategy
training in a task-based language classroom. The Language Learning
Journal, 43(1), 20–40.
*Lai, C., Zhao, Y., & Wang, J. (2011). Task-based
language teaching in online ab initio foreign language classrooms. The Modern
Language
Journal, 95(1), 81–103.
*Lambert, C. (2022). Task-based
language teaching in a Japanese university: From needs analysis to
evaluation. In M. J. Ahmadian & M. H. Long (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of task-based language
teaching (pp. 121–134). Cambridge University Press.
*Lochana, M., & Deb, G. (2006). Task
based teaching: Learning English without tears. Asian EFL
Journal, 8(3), 140–164.
Long, M. H. (2016). In
defense of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 36, 5–33.
*McAllister, J., Narcy-Combes, M. F., & Starkey-Perret, R. (2012). Language
teachers’ perceptions of a task-based learning programme in a French
University. In A. Shehadeh & C. A. Coombe (Eds.), Task-based
language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and
implementation (pp. 313–342). John Benjamins.
McDonough, K. (2015). Perceived
benefits and challenges with the use of collaborative tasks in EFL
contexts. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains
and directions in the development of
TBLT (pp. 225–246). John Benjamins.
*McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W. (2007). Teachers’
and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL
Quarterly, 41(1), 107–132.
*Morris, K. J. (2017). Learning
by doing: The affordances of task-based pragmatics instruction for beginning L2 Spanish learners studying
abroad [Unpublished doctoral
dissertation]. University of California Davis, US.
Norris, J., & Davis, J. (2022). Evaluating
task-based language programs. In M. J. Ahmadian & M. H. Long (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of task-based language
teaching (pp. 529–548). Cambridge University Press.
Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2022). The
research–practice dialogue in second language learning and teaching: Past, present, and
future. The Modern Language
Journal, 106(3), 509–527.
Sato, M., Loewen, S., & Pastushenkov, D. (2021). ‘Who
is my research for?’: Researcher perceptions of the research–practice
relationship. Applied
Linguistics, 43(4), 625–652.
*Tinker-Sachs, G. (2007). The
challenges of adopting and adapting task-based cooperative teaching and learning in an EFL
context. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp, & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks
in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based
perspective (pp. 235–264). Cambridge Scholars.
Van den Branden, K. (2022). How
to teach an additional language: To task or not to task? John Benjamins.
Van Gorp, K., Coss, M., Tuzcu, A., & Guan, X. (2022, August 29–31). TBLT
in a Chinese university: Course development, implementation, reflections, and
results [Colloquium]. 9th International Conference on
Task-Based Language Teaching: Broadening the Horizon of TBLT, Innsbruck,
Austria.
