In:Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching
Edited by Shaofeng Li
[Task-Based Language Teaching 16] 2024
► pp. 313–343
Chapter 11Teacher IDs and task adaptations
Making use of the TBLT Language Learning Task Bank
Published online: 6 June 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.16.11gur
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.16.11gur
Abstract
This multi-site study explores how 18 graduate-level L2 teacher participants adapted tasks from
the TBLT Language Learning Task Bank for specific learner needs and teaching contexts, and if their individual
differences (IDs) influenced their adaptations. Participants first completed a questionnaire about their experiences
as L2 learners and teachers, their knowledge of TBLT, and how they search for course materials. They then defined a
teaching context (current, past, or prospective), specified a task need (i.e., communicative practice of a specific
linguistic target), and identified task features to search for in the Task Bank. Next, participants screen captured
and recorded their search and evaluation of possible tasks while thinking aloud, choosing one to adapt to their
context. Finally, participants watched their video and submitted a written reflection. Bottom-up thematic analysis was
used to determine how participants adapted the tasks from the Task Bank, if their IDs related to the ways they adapted
their selected task, and whether these adaptations aligned with their specific teaching context. The results showed
that all 18 teachers were successful in adapting their tasks to align with their stated teaching context and learner
needs, demonstrating that the Task Bank works well for the target audience of diverse teachers. It was also found that
teacher IDs did not play a role in their task adaptations when examined separately. However, a qualitative cluster
analysis showed that more experienced teachers tended to focus on providing linguistic instruction and increasing
interaction in task adaptation while less experienced teachers utilized a wide array of techniques. The minimal ID
cluster profiles that were discernible lend support to the consideration of IDs in tandem with – rather than in
isolation from – each other.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Literature review
- The role of the teacher in TBLT
- Teacher IDs
- Researcher and teacher perspectives in TBLT
- The current study
- Methods
- Participants and contexts
- Procedure
- Coding and analysis
- Methods
- Results
- RQ1: How do L2 teacher participants adapt tasks from the TBLT Language Learning Task Bank for their specific
learner needs and teaching context?
- Adding linguistic support or instruction
- Increasing interaction or use of the oral modality
- Shifting the purpose to match the learners’ reported needs or interests
- Increasing the input or modifying the input
- RQ2: Based on our teacher-researcher perspective, how do participants’ adaptations align with their defined contexts?
- RQ3: To what extent do L2 teacher participants’ IDs (e.g., age, gender, teaching experience) influence their task adaptations?
- RQ1: How do L2 teacher participants adapt tasks from the TBLT Language Learning Task Bank for their specific
learner needs and teaching context?
- Discussion
- Limitations and future research
- Pedagogical implications
Notes References Appendix
References (49)
Andringa, S., & Godfroid, A. (2020). On
the foundations of knowledge in Applied Linguistics research: Sampling bias and the problem of
generalizability. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 40, 134–142.
Baralt, M., Harmath-de Lemos, S., & Werfelli, S. (2014). Teachers’
application of the Cognition Hypothesis when lesson planning: A case
study. In M. Baralt, R., Gilabert, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Task
sequencing and instructed second language
learning (pp. 179–206). Bloomsbury Academic.
Bryfonski, L. (2021a). From
task-based training to task-based instruction: Novice language teachers’ experiences and
perspectives. Language Teaching Research, Online
First, 1–25.
(2021b). Training
native and non-native English-speaking teachers: Task-based language teaching in
Honduras. In K. Bailey & D. Christian (Eds.), Research
on teaching and learning English in under-resourced
contexts (pp. 128–142). Routledge.
(2021c). Connecting
teacher training to TBLT implementation: A case study of pre-service teachers in Honduran bilingual
schools. In M. J. Ahmadian & M. Long (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of task-based language
teaching (pp. 463–477). Cambridge University Press.
Butler, Y. G. (2011). The
implementation of communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific
region. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 31, 36–57.
Carless, D. (2004). Issues
in teachers’ re-interpretation of a task-based innovation in primary
schools. TESOL
Quarterly, 38, 639–662.
(2007). The
suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong
Kong. System, 35, 595–608.
Carver, C., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (in
press). Task-based domestic immersion: Insights from teacher
implementation. In C. Lambert (Ed.), Designing
tasks for teaching foreign languages: Principles and practices. Cambridge University Press.
Chan, S. P. S. (2012). Qualitative
differences in novice teachers’ enactment of task-based language teaching in Hong Kong primary
classrooms. In A. Shehadeh & C. A. Coombe (Eds.), Task-based
language teaching in foreign language
contexts (pp. 187–214). John Benjamins.
Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based
language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of
Applied
Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246.
(2024). Conclusion:
Some thoughts on investigating individual differences in task-based language
teaching. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual
differences and task-based language
teaching (pp. 356–374). John Benjamins.
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based
language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Erlam, R. (2016). ‘I’m
still not sure what a task is’: Teachers designing language tasks. Language
Teaching
Research, 20(3), 279–299.
Gilabert, R. (n.d.). Arrangements
over the phone. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss, & IATBLT (n.d.). The
TBLT Language Learning Task Bank. Retrieved on 1 October 2021 from [URL]
Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2014). Spanish
graduate instructors’ in-class cognition and feedback provision over
time. In R. T. Miller. K. I. Martin, C. M. Eddington, A. Henery, N. M. Miguel, & A. M. Tseng (Eds.), Selected
Proceedings of the 2012 Second Language Research
Forum (pp. 227–239). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
(2016a). Factors
influencing Spanish instructors’ in-class feedback decisions. Modern Language
Journal, 100(1), 255–275.
(2016b). Spanish
instructors’ operationalization and interpretation of task complexity and sequencing in non-experimental
foreign language lessons. The Language Learning
Journal, 44(4), 467–486.
(2017). L2
instructor individual characteristics. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of instructed second language
acquisition (pp. 451–467). Routledge.
(Ed.). (2020a). Cross-theoretical
explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences. John Benjamins.
(Ed.). (2020b). Investigating
the dynamic nature of learner individual differences in L2 learning. Studies in
Second Language Learning and
Teaching, 10(1).
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., Geeslin, K. L., Daidone, D., Linford, B., Long, A. Y., Michalski, I., & Solon, M. (2018). Examining
multifaceted sources of input: Variationist and usage-based approaches to understanding the L2
classroom. In A. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno, & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usage-inspired
L2 instruction: Researched
pedagogy (pp. 293–313). John Benjamins.
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., Geeslin, K. L., Long, A. Y., & Daidone, D. (2017). Linguistic
variation in instructor provision of oral
input. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Expanding
individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other
interlocutors (pp. 225–254). John Benjamins.
Jung, D., DiBartolomeo, M., Melero-García, F., Giacomino, L., Gurzynski-Weiss, L., Henderson, C., & Hidalgo, M. (2020). Tracking
the dynamic nature of learner individual differences: Initial results from a longitudinal
study. Studies in Second Language Learning and
Teaching, 10(1), 177–219.
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex
systems in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Li, S., Hiver, P., & Papi, M. (Eds.). (2022). The
Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual
differences. Routledge.
(2016). In
defense of tasks and TBLT: Non-issues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 36, 5–33.
Luft, C. (n.d.). What
are you wearing / Was trägst
du? In L. Gurzynski-Weiss, & IATBLT (n.d.). The
TBLT Language Learning Task Bank. Retrieved on 1 October 2021 from [URL]
Mackey, A., Polio, C., & McDonough, K. (2004). The
relationship between experience, education and teachers’ use of incidental focus-on-form
techniques. Language Teaching
Research, 8(3), 301–327.
McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W. (2007). Teachers’
and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL
Quarterly, 41(1), 107–132.
Moranski, K., & Ziegler, N. (2021). A
case for multisite second language acquisition research: Challenges, risks, and
rewards. Language
Learning, 71(1), 204–242.
Révész, A., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2016). Teachers’
perspectives on second language task difficulty: Insights from think-alouds and
eye-tracking. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 36, 182–204.
Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007). Task
complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and second language learning and
performance. International Review of Applied
Linguistics, 45, 161–176.
Samuda, V., Van den Branden, K., & Bygate, M. (Eds.). (2018). TBLT
as a researched pedagogy. John Benjamins.
Serafini, E. J. (2020). The
impact of learner perceptions of interlocutor individual differences on learner possible selves during a
short-term experience abroad. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical
explorations of interlocutors and their individual
differences (pp. 209–246). John Benjamins.
Shintani, N. (2016). Input-based
tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. John Benjamins.
Solares-Altamirano, M. E. (2020). 12
teachers’ responses to an online course on task-based language teaching in
Mexico. In C. Lambert & R. Oliver (Eds.), Using
tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse
contexts (pp. 193–212). Multilingual Matters.
Swan, M. (2005). Legislation
by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied
Linguistics, 26(3), 376–401.
Tavakoli, P. (2009). Investigating
task difficulty: Learners’ and teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of
Applied
Linguistics, 19(1), 1–25.
Torres, J. (n.d.). Cortefiel
consultants – Layoffs. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss, & IATBLT, The
TBLT Language Learning Task Bank. Retrieved on 1 October 2021 from [URL]
(n.d.). Au
pair shopping list. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss, & IATBLT, The
TBLT Language Learning Task Bank. Retrieved on 1 October 2021 from [URL]
Tsui, A. (2003). Understanding
expertise in teaching: Case studies of ESL teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Van den Branden, K. (2016). The
role of teachers in task-based language education. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 36, 164–181.
Vandommele, G., Van den Branden, K., & Van Gorp, K. (2018). Task-based
language teaching: How task-based is it
really? In V. Samuda, K. Van den Branden, & M. Bygate (Eds.), TBLT
as a researched
pedagogy (pp. 166–197). John Benjamins.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Xu, Jiamin & Melissa Baralt
Ellis, Rod
2024. Conclusion. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 346 ff.
Li, Shaofeng
2024. Individual differences and task-based language teaching. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 10 ff.
Namkung, Yoon & YouJin Kim
2024. A review of learner motivation and engagement research in task-based language teaching. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 198 ff.
Skehan, Peter
2024. Foreword. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
