In:Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching
Edited by Shaofeng Li
[Task-Based Language Teaching 16] 2024
► pp. 228–260
Chapter 8Teachers’ and learners’ beliefs about task-based language teaching
A systematic review
Published online: 6 June 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.16.08dao
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.16.08dao
Abstract
This chapter provides a systematic review of studies on learner/teacher beliefs in the context of
task-based language teaching (TBLT). This review aims to identify the foci, conceptualisation, operationalisation of
beliefs in TBLT, methodological characteristics, and major research findings. The results showed a lack of consistent
conceptualisation and operationalisation of the concept of beliefs, and the studies have focused more on teachers’
beliefs about TBLT than learners’. The results also demonstrated a number of methodological issues such as lack of
important background information about the participants and the study’s context, an excessive focus on English as a
target language, an over-reliance on the normative approach (as opposed to the contextual approach), and a lack of
clear and rigorus procedure for construct validation and data analysis. Despite these issues, the results show that
TBLT research on beliefs appears to head toward an appropriate direction by adopting multi-method approaches and using
diverse data collection tools. Also, the results show a promising picture for adopting and implementing TBLT in
diverse contexts from both teachers’ and learners’ perspectives.
Keywords: TBLT, beliefs, systemamtic review, individual differences, perceptions
Article outline
- Introduction
- Second language (L2) beliefs as an individual difference variable
- Task-based language teaching: Conceptualisation, principles, and issues
- The current study: Teachers and/or learners’ beliefs in the context of TBLT
- Method
- Creating a pool of reports and searching articles
- Coding and analyses
- Findings
- Overview of the corpus
- TBLT research on beliefs: Foci, conceptualisation, and operationalisation
- Methodological characteristics of TBLT studies on teachers’ and learners’ beliefs
- Teacher/learner beliefs in TBLT research: Major findings
- Teachers’ understanding of TBLT as a pedagogy
- Teachers’ and learners’ attitudes toward TBLT
- Factors affecting teachers’ implementation and views towards TBLT
- Impact of training on teachers’ perceptions of TBLT
- Other results
- Discussion
- Methodological issues of TBLT research on teachers’ and learners’ beliefs
- Teachers’ and learners’ beliefs
- Conclusion
References Appendix
References (93)
(references with asterisk (*) are the synthesized studies selected in the corpus for this study)
*Andon, N., & Eckerth, J. (2009). Chacun
à son gout? Task-based L2 pedagogy from the teacher’s point of
view. International Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 19(3), 286–310.
Andringa, S., & Godfroid, A. (2020). Sampling
bias and the problem of generalizability in applied linguistics. Annual Review
of Applied
Linguistics, 40(1), 134–142.
Barcelos, A. M. F. (2003). Researching
beliefs about SLA: a critical review. In P. Kalaja, & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs
about SLA: New research
approaches (pp. 7–34). Kluwer.
Barcelos, A. M. F., & Kalaja, P. (2011). Introduction
to beliefs about SLA
revisited. System, 39(3), 281–289.
*Bao, R., & Du, X. (2015). Implementation
of task-based language teaching in Chinese as a foreign language: benefits and
challenges. Language, Culture and
Curriculum, 28(3), 291–310.
Basturkmen, H. (2012). Review
of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and
practices. System, 40(2), 282–295.
Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2004). Teachers’
stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom
practices. Applied
linguistics, 25(2), 243–272.
*Block, D. (1994). A
day in the life of a class: Teacher/learner perceptions of task purpose in
conflict. System, 22(4), 473–486.
(2011). The
impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers’
beliefs. System, 39(3), 370–380.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., & Higgins, J. P. T., Rothstein, H. R. (Eds). (2009). Introduction
to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
*Bryfonski, L. (2021). From
task-based training to task-based instruction: Novice language teachers’ experiences and
perspectives. Language Teaching Research.
Bryfonski, L., & McKay, T. H. (2019). TBLT
implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching
Research, 23(3), 603–632.
*Bui, T., & Newton, J. (2022). Developing
task-based lessons from PPP lessons: A case of primary English textbooks in
Vietnam. RELC
Journal, 53(1), 203–215.
Butler, Y. G. (2011). The
implementation of communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific
region. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 31(1), 36–57.
Byrnes, H. (2002). The
role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate foreign language
curriculum. Language
Testing, 19(4), 419–437.
*Calvert, M., & Sheen, Y. (2015). Task-based
language learning and teaching: An action-research study. Language Teaching
Research, 19(2), 226–244.
*Carless, D. R. (2003). Factors
in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary
schools. System, 31(4), 485–500.
*Carless, D. (2004). Issues
in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary
schools. TESOL
Quarterly, 38(4), 639–662.
*Carless, D. (2007). The
suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong
Kong. System, 35(4), 595–608.
*Chen, Q., & Wright, C. (2017). Contextualization
and authenticity in TBLT: Voices from Chinese classrooms. Language Teaching
Research, 21(4), 517–538.
Chong, S. W., & Reinders, H. (2020). Technology-mediated
task-based language teaching: A qualitative research synthesis. Language
Learning and
Technology, 24(3), 70–86. [URL]
Colpin, M., & Van Gorp, K. (2007). Task-based
writing in primary education: The development and evaluation of writing skills through writing tasks, learner
and teacher support. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp, & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks
in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based
perspective (pp. 194–234). Cambridge Scholars.
Dörnyei, Z. (2010). Researching
motivation: From integrativeness to the ideal L2
self. In S. Hunston & D. Oakey, Introducing
applied linguistics: Concepts and
skills (p. 74–83). Routledge.
*Du, X., Zhao, K., Ruan, Y., Wang, L., & Duan, X. (2017). Beginner
CFL learners’ perceptions of language difficulty in a task-based teaching and learning (TBTL) environment in
Denmark. System, 69, 108–120.
*East, M. (2012). Addressing
the intercultural via task-based language teaching: Possibility or
problem?. Language and Intercultural
Communication, 12(1), 56–73.
*East, M. (2014). Encouraging
innovation in a modern foreign language initial teacher education programme: What do beginning teachers make
of task-based language teaching? The Language Learning
Journal, 42(3), 261–274.
*East, M. (2019). Sustaining
innovation in school modern foreign language programmes: teachers’ reflections on task-based language teaching
three years after initial teacher education. The Language Learning
Journal, 47(3), 105–115.
*East, M. (2020). Task-based
language teaching as a tool for the revitalisation of te reo Māori: One beginning teacher’s
perspective. The Language Learning
Journal, 48(3), 272–284.
*East, M. (2021). What
do beginning teachers make of task-based language teaching? A comparative re-production of East
(2014). Language
Teaching, 54(4), 552–566.
(2009). Task-based
language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of
Applied
Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246.
(2017). Position
paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward. Language
Teaching, 50(4), 507–526.
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based
language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Fanelli, D. (2010). Do
pressures to publish increase scientists’ bias? An empirical support from US States
Data. PloS
one, 5(4), 102–171.
*González-Lloret, M., & Nielson, K. B. (2015). Evaluating
TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching
Research, 19(5), 525–549.
*Han, Z. (2018). Task-based
learning in task-based teaching: Training teachers of Chinese as a foreign
language. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 38(1), 162–186.
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2021). Engagement
in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and
definitions. Language Teaching
Research, 28(1), 201–230.
Horwitz, E. K. (1985). Using
student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods
course. Foreign Language
Annals, 18(4), 333–340.
(1988). The
beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language
students. The Modern Language
Journal, 72(3), 283–294.
Jackson, D. O., & Suethanapornkul, S. (2013). The
cognition hypothesis: A synthesis and meta-analysis of research on second language task
complexity. Language
Learning, 63(2), 330–367.
*Ji, Y., & Pham, T. (2020). Implementing
task-based language teaching (TBLT) to teach grammar in English classes in China: using design-based research
to explore challenges and strategies. Innovation in Language Learning and
Teaching, 14(2), 164–177.
*Juan-Garau, M., & Jacob, K. (2015). Developing
English learners’ transcultural skills through content-and task-based
lessons. System, 54(2), 55–68.
Keck, C., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing
research on language learning and
teaching (pp. 91–131). John Benjamins.
*Kim, Y., Jung, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2017). Implementation
of a localized task-based course in an EFL context: A study of students’ evolving
perceptions. TESOL
Quarterly, 51(3), 632–660.
Klapper, J. (2003). Taking
communication to task? A critical review of recent trends in language
teaching. Language Learning
Journal, 27(1), 33–42.
*Lai, C., & Lin, X. (2015). Strategy
training in a task-based language classroom. The Language Learning
Journal, 43(1), 20–40.
*Lai, C., Zhao, Y., & Wang, J. (2011). Task-based
language teaching in online ab initio foreign language classrooms. The Modern
Language Journal, 95(Supplementary
issue), 81–103.
Li, S., Zhu, Y., & Ellis, R. (2016). The
effects of the timing of corrective feedback on the acquisition of a new linguistic
structure. The Modern Language
Journal, 100(1), 276–295.
Li, S., & Wang, H. (2018). Traditional
literature review and research synthesis. In A. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.), Palgrave
handbook of applied linguistics research
methodology (pp. 123–144). Palgrave Macmillan.
*Lin, T. B., & Wu, C. W. (2012). Teachers’
perceptions of task-based language teaching in English classrooms in Taiwanese junior high
schools. TESOL
Journal, 3(4), 586–609.
*Liu, C., & Guo, R. (2020). A
study of localization of task-based language teaching in China. Chinese Journal
of Applied
Linguistics, 43(2), 205–218.
*Liu, Y., & Ren, W. (2021). Task-based
language teaching in a local EFL context: Chinese university teachers’ beliefs and
practices. Language Teaching Research. Online
First.
*Liu, Y., Mishan, F., & Chambers, A. (2021). Investigating
EFL teachers’ perceptions of task-based language teaching in higher education in
China. The Language Learning
Journal, 49(2), 131–146.
Long, M., & Crookes. G. (1992). Three
approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL
Quarterly, 26(1), 27–55.
Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction
research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research
synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational
interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical
studies (pp. 407–453). Oxford University Press.
*McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W. (2007). Teachers’
and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL
Quarterly, 41(1), 107–132.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The
PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred
reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA
statement. PLoS
Medicine, 6, e1000097. Open
Medicine 3(4), 123–30.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness
of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative
meta-analysis. Language
Learning, 50(3), 417–528.
*Ogilvie, G., & Dunn, W. (2010). Taking
teacher education to task: Exploring the role of teacher education in promoting the utilization of task-based
language teaching. Language Teaching
Research, 14(2), 161–181.
Oswald, F. L., & Plonsky, L. (2010). Meta-analysis
in second language research: Choices and challenges. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 30(1), 85–110.
Page et al. (2020). The
PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic
reviews. Clinical
Research, 88, 372–371.
*Peng, Y., & Pyper, J. S. (2021). Finding
success with pedagogical innovation: A case from CSL teachers’ experiences with
TBLT. Language Teaching
Research, 25(4), 633–655.
Oliver, R., & Bogachenko, T. (2024). Task-based
language learning and teaching: Differences according to
age. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual
differences and task-based language
teaching (pp. 270–295). John Benjamins.
*Ooyoung Pyun, D. (2013). Attitudes
toward task-based language learning: A study of college Korean language
learners. Foreign Language
Annals, 46(1), 108–121.
Plonsky, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). Task-based
learner production: A substantive and methodological review. Annual Review of
Applied
Linguistics, 36(1), 73–97.
*Qiu, X., & Xu, J. (2022). "
Listening should be done communicatively": Do task-supported language teaching and post-task self-reflection
facilitate the development of L2 listening
proficiency? System, 109, 102–897.
Richardson, V. (1996). The
role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to
teach. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds). Handbook
of research on teacher
education (p. 273–290). Macmillan.
*Ritzau, U. (2018). From
form-focussed to communicative: How university students change their beliefs about learning a foreign
language. The Language Learning
Journal, 46(3), 263–276.
Sachs G. T. (2007). The
challenges of adopting and adapting task-based cooperative teaching and learning in an EFL
context. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp, & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks
in action: Education from a classroom-based
perspective (pp. 235–264). Cambridge University Press.
Sasayama, S., Malicka, A., & Norris, J. M. (2015). Primary
challenges in cognitive task complexity research: Results of a comprehensive research
synthesis. Paper presented at the colloquium ‘An
international collaborative research network (CRN) on task complexity’, Sixth International Conference on
Task-Based Language
Teaching (TBLT), Katolieke Universiteit
Leuven, Belgium.
Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How
to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews,
meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of
Psychology, 70, 747–770.
Skehan, P. (1996). A
framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied
linguistics, 17(1), 38–62.
Thomas, M., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). (2010). Task-based
language learning and teaching with
technology. Springer.
*Valeo, A., & Spada, N. (2016). Is
there a better time to focus on form? Teacher and learner views. TESOL
Quarterly, 50(2), 314–339.
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. M. (Eds.). (2009). Task-based
language teaching: A reader. John Benjamins
*Vieira, F. (2017). Task-based
instruction for autonomy: Connections with contexts of practice, conceptions of teaching, and professional
development strategies. TESOL
Quarterly, 51(3), 693–715.
(2024). Practitioners’
perspectives: How teachers use TBLT to accommodate individual
differences. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual
differences and task-based language
teaching (pp. 298–323). John Benjamins.
Van den Branden, K. (Ed.). (2006). Task-based
language education. From theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
Vitta, J. P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2017). Scopus-
and SSCI-indexed L2 journals: A list for the Asia TEFL community. Journal of
Asia
TEFL, 14(4), 784–792.
*Xu, J., & Fan, Y. (2022). Finding
success with the implementation of task-based language teaching: The role of teacher
agency. Language, Culture and
Curriculum, 35(1), 18–35.
Xuan, Q., Cheung, A., & Liu, J. (2022). How
effective is task-based language teaching to enhance second language learning? A technical comment on
Bryfonski and McKay (2019). Language Teaching
Research. Online First.
Zhang, Y. (2007). TBLT-innovation
in primary school English language teaching in Mainland
China. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp, & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks
in action: Taskbased language education from a classroom-based
perspective (pp. 68–91). Cambridge Scholars.
*Zhang, Y., & Luo, S. (2018). Teachers’
beliefs and practices of task-based language teaching in Chinese as a second language
classrooms. Chinese Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 41(3), 264–287.
*Zheng, X., & Borg, S. (2014). Task-based
learning and teaching in China: Secondary school teachers’ beliefs and
practices. Language teaching
research, 18(2), 205–221.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Dao, Phung, Phil Hiver, Mai Xuan Nhat Chi Nguyen, Jianing E & Zehui Yang
Davila-Romero, Raul & Natalie Kirchhoff
Ellis, Rod
2024. Conclusion. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 346 ff.
Li, Shaofeng
2024. Individual differences and task-based language teaching. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 10 ff.
Namkung, Yoon & YouJin Kim
2024. A review of learner motivation and engagement research in task-based language teaching. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 198 ff.
Skehan, Peter
2024. Foreword. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 1 ff.
Willis, Jane
2024. Practitioners’ perspectives. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 288 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
