Cover not available

In:Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching
Edited by Shaofeng Li
[Task-Based Language Teaching 16] 2024
► pp. 161–195

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 6
The effects of planning type, working memory, and anxiety on L2 writing performance

 | Florida State University
 | The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Published online: 6 June 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.16.06anh
Abstract
This study explores (1) the effect of planning type on second language learners’ writing performance and (2) the role of working memory and anxiety in different types of planning. 48 Korean high school English as a foreign language learners participated in the study. Each learner composed a written narrative under one of the three planning conditions: pre-task planning, within-task planning, and no planning. The results showed that pre-task planning enhanced fluency, while within-task planning led to greater accuracy. Regarding the impact of individual difference factors, it was found that that working memory was a significant predictor of morphosyntactic accuracy of the pre-task planning group’s writing. Anxiety significantly predicted morphosyntactic accuracy across all planning conditions, and it was a significant predictor of the syntactic complexity of the essays written under the pre-task planning condition. Working memory and anxiety were not predictive of fluency and overall writing quality.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Literature review
    • Theoretical background
    • Planning in writing process
    • Working memory in L2 writing
    • Anxiety in L2 writing
    • Research questions
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Materials
      • Writing task
      • The working memory test
      • The L2 writing anxiety questionnaire
    • Procedure
    • Data analysis
  • Results
    • The effects of planning conditions
    • The roles of working memory and anxiety
  • Discussion
    • The effect of planning type
    • Working memory
    • Writing anxiety
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (65)
References
An, H., & Li, S. (2022). Working memory and second language interaction. In J. Schwieter & Z. Wen (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of working memory and language (pp. 656–698). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). Anxiety in task-based language teaching: A state-of-the-art review. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual differences and task-based language teaching (pp. 52–86). John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atay, D., & Kurt, G. (2006). Prospective teachers and L2 writing anxiety. Asian EFL Journal, 8(4), 100–118.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 417–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Working memory in second language learning. In Z. Wen, M. Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 17–28). Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bailey, P., Onwuegbuzie, A., & Daley, C. (2000). Correlates of anxiety at three stages of the foreign language learning process. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 474–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergsleithner, J. M. (2010). Working memory capacity and L2 writing performance. Ciências & Cognição, 12(2), 2–20. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Y. S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 313–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Development and preliminary validation of four brief measures of L2 language-skill-specific anxiety. System, 68, 15–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Y. S., Horwitz, E. K., & Schallert, D. L. (1999). Language anxiety: Differentiating writing and speaking components. Language Learning, 49(3), 417–446. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, M. (2018). Task complexity, modality, and working memory in L2 task performance. System, 72, 85–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 474–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). The effects of pre-task planning on second language writing: A systematic review of experimental studies. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 44(2), 131–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). Conclusion: Some thoughts on investigating individual differences in task-based language teaching. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual differences and task-based language teaching (pp. 356–374). John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 59–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudson, R. (2009). Measuring maturity. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, M. Nystrand & J. Riley (Eds.), The Sage handbook of writing development (pp. 349–362). Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. D. (2017). Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 37, 13–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57–72). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. T., Whiteford, A. P., Turner, C. E., Cahill, M., & Mertens, A. (2013). Working memory in written composition: An evaluation of the 1996 model. Journal of Writing Research, 5, 159–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kormos, J. (2011). Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 148–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 390–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 261–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Task complexity and linguistic performance in L2 writing and speaking. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 91–104). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuiken, F., Mos, M., & Vedder, I. (2005). Cognitive task complexity and second language writing performance. EUROSLA Yearbook, 5, 195–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, S. (2023a). Working memory and second language learning: A critical and synthetic review. In A. Godfroid & H. Hopp (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and psycholinguistics (pp. 348–360). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023b). Working memory and second language writing: A systematic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45, 647–679. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y. (2019). The associations between cognitive ability and L2 development under five different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(3), 693–722. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, S., & Fu, M. (2018). Strategic and unpressured within-task planning and their associations with working memory. Language Teaching Research, 22(2), 230–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, L., Chen, J., & Sun, L. (2015). The effects of different lengths of pretask planning time on L2 learners’ oral test performance. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 38–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 77–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, X. (2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level EFL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 36–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P. D. & Gregersen. T. (2012). Affect: The role of language anxiety and other emotions in language learning. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan, & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice (pp. 103–118). Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manchón, R. (2014). The internal dimension of tasks. The interaction between task factors and learner factors in bringing about learning through writing. In H. Byrnes & R. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 27–52). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mavrou, I. (2020). Working memory, executive functions, and emotional intelligence in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 100758. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ong, J., & Zhang, L. (2010). Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students’ argumentative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 218–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). Task-based learner production: A substantive and methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 73–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prabhu, N. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. (2019). Writing task complexity, students’ motivational beliefs, anxiety and their writing production in English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 32, 761–786. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Révész, A., Michel, M., & Lee, M. (2017). Investigating IELTS academic writing task 2: Relationship between cognitive writing processes, text quality, and working memory. IELTS Research Reports Online Series. Retrieved on 15 January 2024 from [URL]
Robinson, P. (2007). Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In M. P. Garcia Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 7–26). Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–37). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz-Funes, M. (2015). Exploring the potential of second/foreign language writing for language learning: The effects of task factors and learner variables. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sasaki, M. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 259–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). Foreword: Individual differences bridge the divides between task-based research and pedagogy. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual differences and task-based language teaching (pp. 1–8). John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabari, M. (2022). Investigating the interactions between L2 writing processes and products under different task planning time conditions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 55, 100871. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trebits, A. (2016). Sources of individual differences in L2 narrative production: The contribution of input, processing, and output anxiety. Applied Linguistics, 37(2), 155–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vallejos, C. A. (2020). Fluency, working memory and second language proficiency in multicompetent writers (Publication No. 27958937, Doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University. ProQuest Dissertations.
Vasylets, O., & Marín, J. (2020). The effects of working memory and L2 proficiency on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, W. (2014). Mapping the relationships among the cognitive complexity of independent writing tasks, L2 writing quality, and complexity, accuracy and fluency of L2 writing (Publication No. 3637700, Doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University. ProQuest Dissertations.
Yoon, H. (2017). Investigating the interactions among genre, task complexity, and proficiency in L2 writing: A comprehensive text analysis and study of learner perceptions (Publication No. 10275616, Doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University. ProQuest Dissertations.
Zabihi, R. (2018). The role of cognitive and affective factors in measures of L2 writing. Written Communication, 35(1), 32–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zabihi, R., Mousavi, S. H., & Salehian, A. (2020). The differential role of domain-specific anxiety in learners’ narrative and argumentative L2 written task performances. Current Psychology, 39(4), 1438–1444. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zalbidea, J. (2017). ‘One task fits all’? The roles of task complexity, modality, and working memory capacity in L2 performance. The Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 335–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zenker, F., & Kyle, K. (2021). Investigating minimum text lengths for lexical diversity indices. Assessing Writing, 47, 100505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Zhu, Jingyu & Zongtuo Liu
2025. Effects of reading-writing continuation task on the L3 writing emotions: the mediating role of cognitive load. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
An, Hyejin & Shaofeng Li
2024. Anxiety in task-based language teaching. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
An, Hyejin & Shaofeng Li
2025. The interplay between planning conditions, direct focused feedback, and individual differences in EFL learners’ second language development. System 133 ► pp. 103728 ff. DOI logo
Ellis, Rod
2024. Conclusion. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
Li, Shaofeng
2024. Individual differences and task-based language teaching. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 10 ff. DOI logo
Magtana, Darline Joy
2024. One Step Backward: A Systematic Literature Review on the Use of N-Back Tasks to Increase Working Memory for Learner in SLA. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review 4:1 ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Namkung, Yoon & YouJin Kim
2024. A review of learner motivation and engagement research in task-based language teaching. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 198 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue