In:Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy: In honour of Peter Skehan
Edited by Zhisheng (Edward) Wen and Mohammad Javad Ahmadian
[Task-Based Language Teaching 13] 2019
► pp. 305–316
Chapter 13Task-based analysis and the Competition Model
Published online: 28 August 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.13.14mac
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.13.14mac
This chapter examines relations between Peter Skehan’s task-based analysis of second language production (Skehan, 1998) and the Competition Model (MacWhinney, 2012, 2015b). Both of these approaches have a long history of development. However, until recently, there has been little interaction between these two perspectives. In this paper, I will suggest that there is more room for interaction than previously imagined, and I will illustrate ways in which the Competition Model can benefit from the important insights and methods Skehan has developed. In addition to these conceptual interactions, there are now important methodological interactions that are becoming possible through the development of the new FluencyBank system at <https://fluency.talkbank.org>.
Article outline
- Fluency
- Complexity
- Accuracy and lexical complexity
- Conclusion
References
References (43)
Bates, E., McNew, S., MacWhinney, B., Devescovi, A., & Smith, S. (1982). Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study. Cognition, 11, 245–299.
Brown, C., Snodgrass, T., Kemper, S. J., Herman, R., & Covington, M. A. (2008). Automatic measurement of propositional idea density from part-of-speech tagging. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 40(2), 540–545. doi:
Covington, M. (2007). MATTR user manual (CASPR research report 2007–05). Athens, GA. Retrieved from < [URL]>
de Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61, 533–568.
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 533–557.
Dominey, P., Hoen, M., & Inui, T. (2006). A neurolinguistic model of grammatical construction processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 2088–2177.
Gass, S., Mackey, M., Alvarez-Torres, M. J., & Fernández-Gracía, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49(4), 549–581.
Gobet, F. (2005). Chunking models of expertise: Implications for Education. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(183–204).
Kowalski, J., Gordon, G., & MacWhinney, B. (2014). Statistical modeling of student performance to improve Chinese dictation skills with an intelligent tutor. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 6, 3–27.
Li, P., Zhao, X., & MacWhinney, B. (2007). Dynamic self-organization and early lexical development in children. Cognitive Science, 31, 581–612.
MacWhinney, B. (1982). Basic syntactic processes. In S. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language acquisition, Vol. 1:
Syntax and semantics
(pp.73–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(1989). Competition and lexical categorization. In R. Corrigan, F. Eckman, & M. Noonan (Eds.), Linguistic categorization (pp.195–242). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2008). How mental models encode embodied linguistic perspectives. In R. Klatzky, B. MacWhinney, & M. Behrmann (Eds.), Embodiment, ego-space, and action (pp.369–410). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2012). The logic of the Unified Model. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp.211–227). New York, NY: Routledge.
(2014a). Conclusions: Competition across time. In B. MacWhinney, A. Malchukov, & E. Moravcsik (Eds.), Competing motivations in grammar and usage (pp.364–386). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2014b). Item-based patterns in early syntactic development. In T. Herbst, H.-J. Schmid, & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions Collocations Patterns (pp.33–70). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
(2015a). Emergentism. In E. Dabrowsksa & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.689–706). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2015b). Multidimensional SLA. In S. Eskilde & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp.22–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1978). Sentential devices for conveying givenness and newness: A cross-cultural developmental study. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 539–558.
(Eds.). (1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
MacWhinney, B., Leinbach, J., Taraban, R., & McDonald, J. (1989). Language learning: Cues or rules? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 255–277.
McDonald, J. (1987). Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 379–414.
McDonald, J., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Maximum likelihood models for sentence processing research. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp.397–421). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
McKee, G., Malvern, D. D., Richards, B. J., & Knott, R. (1998). Vocd: Software for measuring vocabulary diversity through mathematical modelling. Leeds: University of Leeds.
Pavlik, P., Presson, N., Dozzi, G., Wu, S., MacWhinney, B., & Koedinger, K. R. (2007). The FaCT (Fact and Concept Training) system: A new tool linking cognitive science with educators. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.1379–1384). Nashville, TN: Cognitive Science Society.
Presson, N., Davy, C., & MacWhinney, B. (2013). Experimentalized CALL for adult second language learners. In J. Schwieter (Ed.), Innovative research and practices in second language acquisition and bilingualism (pp.139–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Presson, N., MacWhinney, B., & Tokowicz, N. (2014). Learning grammatical gender: The use of rules by novice learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 709–737.
Schapiro, A. C., Turk-Browne, N. B., Botvinick, M. M., & Norman, K. A. (2017). Complementary learning systems within the hippocampus: a neural network modelling approach to reconciling episodic memory with statistical learning. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 372(1711), 20160049.
Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
(2014). Processing perspectives on task performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Skehan, P., Foster, P., & Shum, S. (2016). Ladders and snakes in second language fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 54(2), 97–112.
Stocco, A., Lebiere, C., & Anderson, J. R. (2010). Conditional routing of information to the cortex: A model of the basal ganglia’s role in cognitive coordination. Psychological Review, 117(2), 541.
Ullman, M. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270.
Walter, D. (2015). Instructing German declension: Additive versus concept-based approaches. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University,
Wong, A., Zhao, H., & MacWhinney, B. (2018). A cognitive linguistics application for second language pedagogy: The English preposition tutor. Language Learning.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
