Cover not available

In:Researching L2 Task Performance and Pedagogy: In honour of Peter Skehan
Edited by Zhisheng (Edward) Wen and Mohammad Javad Ahmadian
[Task-Based Language Teaching 13] 2019
► pp. 279–302

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 12
Task-induced second language development

A micro-genetic study

 | Curtin UniversityPerth, Australia
Published online: 28 August 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.13.13lam
The present study provides a fine-grained analysis of how a 22-year-old Japanese English learner (Miwako) structured and restructured her language resources across a sequence of tasks which progressively increased in referential demand. It provides a picture of how language was tailored to communicative task demands through performance. The method of microgenetic analysis employed (Siegler, 2006) considers fluctuations in variability as well as the path, rate and breadth of change in the form-to-function mappings used in completing the task. It also considers sources of variability and possible mechanisms of change. In so doing, the discussion focuses on the emergence of two language forms that allowed the speaker to complete the task more effectively and efficiently (relative clauses and comparative structures) and relates this developmental variation to general fluctuations in CALF. The results indicate that over the course of the task sequence the learner’s L2 use showed evidence of:(1) an initial state of stabilized language use in completing easy versions of the task, (2) the destabilization of these routine linguistic strategies and a period of high variability in response to increased referential demand, and (3) subsequent organization of novel linguistic strategies in response to repeated exposure to these increased demands. The analysis thus demonstrates how task-induced L2 variation related to local-level change in the language the speaker used. It also shows how the processes of change over approximately an hour of task performance were parallel to those that have been documented over months (Larsen-Freeman, 2006; Verspoor, Lowie & van Dijk, 2008; Spoelman & Verspoor, 2010). Finally, it was found that CALF provided a complementary perspective that was broadly consistent with the microgenetic analysis in this case but masked variables in task-induced L2 change that may confound findings in other cases.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Literature review
  • The present study
  • Research questions
  • Methods
    • The participant
    • Materials
    • Procedures
    • Analysis
  • Results
    • Micro-genetic analysis
    • Quantitative analyses
    • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • References
  • Appendix
References (44)
References
Berman, R. (2008). The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language, 35, 735–771. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp.216–236). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistics database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Jong, N., Steinel, M., Florijn, A., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. (2012). Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 893–916. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1985). Sources of variability in interlanguage. Applied Linguistics, 6, 118–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fazio, L., & Siegler, R. (2013). Microgenetic learning analysis: A distinction without a difference. Human Development, 56, 52–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken discourse: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21, 354–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilhooly, K., & Logie, R. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 395–427. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givon, T. (1985). Function, structure and language acquisition. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 2: Theoretical issues (pp.1005–1027). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. (2013). Capturing the diversity in lexical diversity. Language Learning, 61(Suppl. 1), 87–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. (2005). Semantics of comparatives. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp.690–694). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1993). Utterance structure. In C. Perdue (Ed.), Adult language acquisition: Crosslinguistic perspectives: The results (pp.3–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kormos, J., & Denes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32, 145–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambert, C., & Kormos, J. (2014). Complexity, accuracy and fluency in task-based L2 research: Toward more developmentally-based measures of second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 5(5): 607–614. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D. (2017). Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1): 167–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590–619. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Complexity theory and dynamic systems theory. In P. Robinson (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition (pp.103–106). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2012). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (Electronic edition), Part 1: The CHAT transcription format. Retrieved April 2014, from < [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (Electronic edition), Part 2: The CLAN programs. Retrieved April 2014, from < [URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & O’Grady, W. (2015). The handbook of language emergence. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nippold, M., Hegel, S., Sohlberg, M., & Schwarz, I. (1999). Defining abstract entities: Development in pre-adolescents, and young adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 473–481. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nippold, M., Hesketh, L., Duthie, J., & Mansfield, T. (2005a). Conversational versus expository discourse: A study of syntactic development in children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1048–1064. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nippold, M., Ward-Lonergan, J., & Fanning, J. (2005b). Persuasive writing in children, adolescents, and adults: A study of syntactic, semantic and pragmatic development. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 125–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paivio, A., Yuille, J., & Madigan, S. (1968). Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 945 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement, 76, 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polat, B., & Kim, Y. (2014). Dynamics of complexity and accuracy: A longitudinal case study of advanced L2 development. Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 184–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravid, D., & Berman, R. (2010). Developing noun phrase complexity at school age: A text-embedded cross-linguistic analysis. First Language, 30, 3–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, M., Verspoor, M., & MacWhinney, B. (2011). Coding and extracting data. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.) A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp.39–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegler, R, (2006). Microgenetic analysis of learning. In D. Kuhn, R. S. Siegler, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 2: Cognition, perception and language (6th ed., pp.464–510). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1): 38–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M. (2010). Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31, 532–553. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stassen, L. (1984). The comparative compared. Journal of Semantics, 3, 143–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Comparative constructions. In K. Brown (Ed.) Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp.686–690). Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toglia, M., & Battig, W. (1978). Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2006). Acquiring linguistic constructions. In D. Kuhn, R. S. Siegler, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 2: Cognition, perception and language (6th ed., pp.255–298). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Geert, P. (2008). The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 179–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verspoor, M., & Behrens, H. (2011). Dynamic systems theory and a usage based approach to second language development. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp.25–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verspoor, M., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (Eds.) (2011). A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & van Dijk, M. (2008). Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92, 214–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Z. (2014). On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp.27–62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yule, G. (1997). Referential communication tasks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Mark D. Johnson & Mahsa Farahanynia
2025. Task Sequencing and L2 Production: A Research Synthesis and Meta‐Analysis. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 35:2 ► pp. 899 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Liping & Craig Lambert
2024. Focus on form in the uptake, stability and transfer of relative clause use across tasks. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 4:1 ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Lambert, Craig, Scott Aubrey & Paul Leeming
2021. Task Preparation and Second Language Speech Production. TESOL Quarterly 55:2 ► pp. 331 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue