In:TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy
Edited by Virginia Samuda, Kris Van den Branden and Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 12] 2018
► pp. 265–286
Chapter 10Becoming a task-based teacher educator
A case study
Published online: 1 November 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.12.11bar
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.12.11bar
In this chapter, I adopt a case study approach to my own transformation from academic researcher to university-level teacher educator responsible for training future language teachers and providing training and professional development workshops to language teachers in my community. I describe how I set out as a newly-minted Ph.D. with a background in second language acquisition (SLA) research and a specialization in task-based language teaching (TBLT), and why and how I had to move beyond my own SLA-based training in order to be able to support teachers in the real world of classroom, particularly those encountering TBLT for the first time. Fundamental to my transition was what I learned from classroom observation, teachers’ feedback, action research, and conscious reflection on my own practices. In what follows, I explore this process through the prism of TBLT, that is, in relation to a suite of courses and workshops on language teaching methodology and TBLT, and chart the evolution of a task-based orientation to the delivery of those courses and its impact on my development as a teacher educator. In this I highlight how the construct of ‘task’ played a useful and facilitative role in framing reflection and development within a teacher education context. With this personal narrative, my goal is to draw on my own experience to highlight the real-world needs of classroom teachers, particularly those new or transitioning to TBLT, and how those needs might best be served by teacher educators.
Article outline
- Background
- My beginnings as a teacher educator: The first year
- The problem
- Lack of experience
- Not seeing results and feeling ashamed at my self-perceived inefficacy
- The transition
- The Foreign Language Teaching Methodology course
- The Task-Based Language Teaching course
- The Teaching Practicum
- Teacher-training workshops in the community
- Conclusion
References
References (38)
Andon, N. (2009). Researching teachers' knowledge, beliefs and practices in relation to TBLT. Research: The Newsletter of the Research Special Interest Group IATEFL, 23, 3–6.
(2011). Exploring TBLT in “optimal” contexts. Paper presentation at the 2011 biennial Task-Based Language Teaching Conference. Lancaster, UK.
Andon, N., & Eckerth, J. (2009). Chacun à son gout? Task-based pedagogy from the teacher’s point of view. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 286–310.
Andon, N., & Leung, C. (2013). The role of approaches and methods in second language teacher education. In S. B. Said & L. J. Zhang (Eds.), Language teachers and teaching: Global perspectives, local initiatives (pp.59–73). Abingdon: Routledge.
Baralt, M., & López-Bravo, M. (2016). Teaching Chinese as a foreign language: A classroom study on the timing of grammar around a task. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 5, 27–61.
Baralt, M., Harmath-de Lemos, S., & Werfelli, S. (2014). Teachers’ application of the Cognition Hypothesis when lesson planning: A case study. In M. Baralt, R. Gilabert, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Task sequencing and instructed second language learning (pp.179–206). London: Bloomsbury.
Berben, M., Van den Branden, K., & Van Gorp, K. (2007). “We’ll see what happens”: Tasks on paper and tasks in a multilingual classroom. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp, & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp.32–67). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Carless, D. (2003). Factors in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary schools. System, 31, 485–500.
(2004). Issues in teachers’ re-interpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 639–662.
(2007). The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong Kong. System, 35, 595–608.
(2009). Revisiting the TBLT versus P-P-P debate: Voices from Hong Kong. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 19, 49–66.
East, M. (2012). Task-based learning from the teachers’ perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Edwards, C., & Willis, J. (2005). Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
(2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 221–246.
(2015). Teachers evaluating tasks. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Erlam, R. (2015). I’m still not sure what a task is: Teachers designing language tasks. Language Teaching Research, 20, 279–299.
Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2016). Factors influencing Spanish instructors’ in-class feedback decisions. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 255–275.
Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach: Some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal, 58, 319–326.
Littlewood, B. (2007). Communicative and task-based learning in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40, 243–249.
Murray, J. (2003). New teacher educators’ needs: Perspectives from research and practice. London: Teacher Training Agency.
Ogilvie, G., & Dunn, W. (2010). Taking teacher education to task: Exploring the role of teacher education in promoting the utilization of task-based language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 14, 161–181.
Phipps, S., & Borg, S. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, 37, 380–390.
Samuda, V. (2011). Teachers’ uses of tasks in the classroom. Invited colloquium paper presentation at the 2011 biennial Task-Based Language Teaching Conference. Lancaster, UK.
(2015). Tasks, design, and the architecture of pedagogical spaces. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference (pp.271–301). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tinker Sachs, G. (2007). The challenges of adopting and adapting task-based cooperative teaching and learning in an EFL context. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp, & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp.235–264). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Van Avermaet, P., Colpin, M., Van Gorp, K., Bogaert, N., & Van den Branden, K. (2006). The role of the teacher in task-based language teaching. In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language teaching: From theory to practice (pp.175–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., & Verhelst, M. (Eds.). (2007). Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Van den Branden, K. (Ed.). (2006). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2009). Mediating between predetermined order and chaos: the role of the teacher in task-based language education. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 264–285.
(2012). A framework for task-based learning. Intrinsic E-Books. <[URL]>
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Austin, Tasha, Aris Clemons & Melissa Baralt
Spada, Nina
2025. Reflecting on task-based language teaching from an Instructed SLA perspective. In Broadening the Horizon of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 17], ► pp. 164 ff.
Gerlach, David
Coss, Matthew D., Melissa Baralt, Aris Clemons, Uju Anya & Déborah Gómez
2023. Leveraging transdisciplinary expertise to develop a task-based Spanish curriculum to combat anti-blackness
in the United States. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 3:2 ► pp. 213 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
