In:TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy
Edited by Virginia Samuda, Kris Van den Branden and Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 12] 2018
► pp. 51–70
Chapter 2Teacher transformation of textbook tasks in Vietnamese EFL high school classrooms
Published online: 1 November 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.12.03ngu
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.12.03ngu
The study reported in this chapter investigated how and why the EFL teachers in a Vietnamese high school diverged from the tasks set in the textbooks provided as part of a task-based curriculum. Over a two-and-a-half-month period, nine teachers (all Vietnamese nationals) were observed teaching a sequence of five lessons covering one textbook unit; a total of 45 observed lessons. The lessons were audio and video recorded, and the teachers and selected students were interviewed. The teachers also took part in stimulated recall sessions. Results of an analysis of the features of the textbook tasks and of the observed lessons showed the teachers frequently adapt or replace textbook tasks, opting to change closed tasks into more open-ended tasks (open, divergent and input-independent) and to modify what they perceived as inauthentic tasks so they were not just ‘real world’, but ‘real’ to students. As to why teachers made these choices, interview data revealed a set of clearly articulated and shared beliefs among the teachers about the nature of teaching and learning, based in part on their experience of experimenting with different types of tasks. Prominent in their stated beliefs was a strong orientation toward the social and affective dimensions of task-based learning which prioritized learner engagement and well-being. This study provides insights into teacher decision making in task based teaching and addresses the pressing call for a ‘researched pedagogy’ which insists that “the use of tasks in classrooms must be an essential focus” (Bygate, 2011).
Article outline
- Introduction
- The study: Research methodology
- The participants
- The curriculum and the textbooks
- Data collection methods
- Data analysis
- Results and discussion
- Teacher choice of oral tasks (RQ 1)
- The teachers’ rationales for divergence from textbook tasks (RQ3)
- Conclusions
References
References (67)
Adams, R., & Newton, J. (2009). TBLT in Asia: Constraints and opportunities. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 9, 1–17.
Andon, N., & Eckerth, J. (2009). Chacun à son gout? Task-based L2 pedagogy from the teacher’s point of view. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 286–310.
Barnard, R., & Nguyen, G. V. (2010). Task-based language teaching (TBLT): A Vietnamese case study using narrative frames to elicit teachers’ beliefs. Language Education in Asia, 1, 77–86.
Berben, M., Van den Branden, K., & Van Gorp, K. (2007). “We’ll see what happens”: Tasks on paper and tasks in a multilingual classroom. In V.d Branden, K. Van Gorp, & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp.32–67). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Bock, G. (2000). Difficulties in implementing communicative theory in Vietnam. Teachers Edition, 2, 24–30.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109.
(2009). Language teacher cognition. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp.163–171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Breen, M., Hird, B., Milton, M., Oliver, R., & Thwait, A. (2001). Making sense of language teaching: Teachers’ principles and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 22(4), 470–501.
Butler, Y. G. (2011). The implementation of communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific region. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 36–57.
Bygate, M. (2011). Tasks in classrooms: Developing TBLT as a researched pedagogy: Invited Colloquia. Paper presented at the 4th Biennial International TBLT Conference, University of Auckland.
Bygate, M., Norris, J., & Van den Branden, K. (2009). Understanding TBLT at the interface between research and pedagogy. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J. M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching. A reader (pp.495–499). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Carless, D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 3(4), 639–662.
(2007). The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong Kong. System, 35, 595–608.
(2012). TBLT in EFL settings: Looking back and moving forwards. In A. Shehadeh & C. A. Coombe (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation. (pp.354–359). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Deng, C., & Carless, D. (2009). The communicativeness of activities in a task-based innovation in Guangdong, China. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 19, 113–134.
Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 275–300.
(2009a). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246.
(2009b). SLA and teacher education. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp.135–143). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2010). Second language acquisition, teacher education and language pedagogy. Language Teaching, 43(2), 182–201.
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Coding data qualitatively. In R. Ellis & G. Barkhuizen (Eds.), Analysing learner language (pp.253–276). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–324.
Foster, P., & Ohta, A. S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 402–430.
Guariento, W., & Morley, J. (2001). Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 55(4), 347–353.
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Guk, L., & Kellogg, D. (2007). The ZPD and whole class teaching: Teacher-led and student-led interactional mediation of tasks. Language Teaching Research, 11(3), 281–299.
Hoang, V. V., Hoang, T. X. H., Vu, T. L., Dao, N. L., Do, T. M., & Nguyen, Q. T.. (2006). English 11: Teacher’s book. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to post method. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lamb, T. E. (2000). Finding a voice: Learner autonomy and teacher education in an urban context. In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions (pp.118–127). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Le, V. C. (2001). Language and Vietnamese pedagogical contexts. Teacher's Edition, November, 34–40.
Le, V. C., & Barnard, R. (2009). Curricular innovation behind closed classroom doors: A Vietnamese case study. Prospect, 24(2), 20–33.
Littlewood, W. (2015). Introduction. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), TBLT in Asia: Challenges and opportunities (pp.9–11). London: Bloomsbury.
Long, M. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17(3), 359–382.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on second language acquisition (pp.413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.
(2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Luo, S., & Xing, J. (2015). Teachers’ perceived difficulty in implementation TBLT in China. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), TBLT in Asia: Challenges and opportunities (pp.139–155). London: Bloomsbury.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32, 207–224.
McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W. (2007). Teachers’ and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 107–132.
MOET. (2010). Guide to implementation of standardized knowledge and skills: The English language subject for Vietnamese high school level. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
Nakahama, Y., Tyler, D., & van Lier, L. (2001). Negotiation of meaning in conversational and Information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 377–405.
Newton, J. (2013). Incidental vocabulary learning in classroom communication tasks. Language Teaching Research, 17(2), 164–187.
Nguyen, T. B. T. (2013). The roles of rehearsal and performance in teaching and learning through tasks in Vietnamese EFL high school classrooms. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
Nguyen, T. B. T., Newton, J. & Crabbe, D. (2015). Preparing for tasks in Vietnamese EFL high school classrooms: Teachers in action. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), TBLT in Asia: Challenges and opportunities (pp.170–188). London: Bloomsbury.
Nguyen, T. B. T., Newton, J., & Crabbe, D. (in preparation). Rehearsal and performance in task-based language teaching.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.
Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction and research. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp.9–34). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Richards, L., & Morse, J. M. (2007). Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27–57.
Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding the relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.119–140). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Shehadeh, A., & Coombe, C. A. (Eds.) (2012). Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp.443–446). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thomas, M., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). (2015). TBLT in Asia: Challenges and opportunities. London: Bloomsbury.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Newton, Jonathan
2025. The coursebook in TBLT. In Broadening the Horizon of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 17], ► pp. 60 ff.
Spada, Nina
2025. Reflecting on task-based language teaching from an Instructed SLA perspective. In Broadening the Horizon of TBLT [Task-Based Language Teaching, 17], ► pp. 164 ff.
Tran, Nam Giang, Xuan Van Ha & Ngoc Hai Tran
Reynolds, Barry Lee, Xuan Van Ha, Melissa H. Yu & Gwo-Jen Hwang
Van den Branden, Kris & Koen Van Gorp
2021. Implementing task-based language education in primary education. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi & Jonathan Newton
Newton, Jonathan & Bao Trang Thi Nguyen
2019. Task repetition and the public performance of speaking tasks in EFL classes at a Vietnamese high school. Language Teaching for Young Learners 1:1 ► pp. 34 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
