In:Learning Language through Task Repetition
Edited by Martin Bygate
[Task-Based Language Teaching 11] 2018
► pp. 223–254
Chapter 9Second language learning through repeated engagement in a poster presentation task
Published online: 25 September 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.11.09kob
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.11.09kob
Abstract
This chapter reports on an ethnographic multiple-case study of EFL students’ language learning through repeated engagement in a poster presentation task. The study draws upon sociocultural and ecological perspectives to highlight the interpersonal processes that contribute to L2 students’ learning through a poster carousel (Lynch & Maclean, 2000, 2001) that involved three presentations by the same group on the same topic, each followed by a question-answer session. Participants were Japanese undergraduate students, and data were collected primarily through classroom observations, audio-recordings of task-related interactions, semi-structured interviews, and collection of relevant documents. Recorded discourse was analyzed mainly using an ethnography of communication approach (Duff, 2002) in order to trace the interactional trajectories that led to changes in students’ performances. The analysis showed that students benefited from their repeated experiences with the task in a variety of ways. Some students acted upon the feedback from their audience to refine their subsequent task performances. Other students used questions from their previous audience to invite contributions from the current audience. Importantly, not all students were willing to change their second and third performances because their main concern was to avoid risk-taking. The chapter concludes by discussing the implications of these findings for research and pedagogy.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Previous studies on task repetition
- Theoretical framework
- Empirical study
- The purpose of the study
- Context of the study and participants
- The focal task
- Data collection
- Data analysis
- Teacher expectations and associated practices
- Ryo’s continued effort to improve his speech
- Nagi’s unpacking of a complex sentence
- Ako’s appropriation of audience questions through procedural repetition
- Rena’s non-appropriation of audience feedback
- Discussion
- Conclusion
Acknowledgments Notes References
References (66)
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (M. Holquist (Ed.) & C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Trans.)). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1975).
Bakhtin, M. W. (1986). Speech genres and other later essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.) & V. W. McGee (Trans.)). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1979).
Batstone, R., & Philp, J. (2013). Classroom interaction and learning opportunities across time and space. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational context (pp. 109–125). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Breen, M. (1987). Learner contributions to task design. In C. N. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks: Lancaster practical papers in English language education (Vol. 7, pp. 23–46). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bygate, M. (2001). The effects of task repetition on the structure and control of language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23–48). Harlow: Longman.
Bygate, M., & Samuda, V. (2005). Integrative planning through the use of task-repetition. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 37–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2009). Creating pressure in task pedagogy: The joint roles of field, purpose, and engagement within the interactional approach. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction (pp. 90–116). New York, NY: Routledge.
Coughlan, P., & Duff, P. (1994). Same task, different activities: Analysis of an SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 173–193). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams, (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duff, P. A. (2000). Repetition in foreign language classroom interaction. In J. K Hall & L. S. Verplaetse (Eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 109–138). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2002). The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: An ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream. Applied Linguistics, 23, 289–322.
(2007a). Beyond generalizability: Contextualization, complexity, and credibility in applied linguistics research. In M. Chalhoub-Deville, C. Chapelle, & P. A. Duff (2007), Inference and generalizability in applied linguistics: Multiple perspectives (pp. 65–95). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2007b). Second language socialization as sociocultural theory: Insights and issues. Language Teaching, 40, 309–319.
Duff, P. A., & Abdi, K. (2016). Negotiating ethical research engagements in multilingual ethnographic studies in education. In P. I De Costa (Ed.), Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives (pp. 121–141). New York, NY: Routledge.
Duff, P. A., & Kobayashi, M. (2010). The intersection of social, cognitive, and cultural processes in language learning: A second language socialization approach. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 75–93). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dweck, C. (1989). Motivation. In A. M. Lesgold & R. Glaser (Eds.), Foundations for a psychology of education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fukuta, J. (2016). Effects of task repetition on learners’ attention orientation in L2 oral production. Language Teaching Research, 20, 321–340.
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez-Torrez, M. J., & Fernández-García, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language learning, 49(4), 549–581.
Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in Discourses (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Hatano, G. (1993). Time to merge Vygotskian and constructivist conceptions of knowledge acquisition. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Context for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 153–166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hawkes, M. L. (2012). Using task repetition to direct learner attention and focus on form. ELT Journal, 66, 327–336.
Kim, Y. (2013). Promoting attention to form through task repetition in a Korean EFL context. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse contexts (pp. 5–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2013). The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction? System, 41, 829–840.
Kobayashi, E. (2007). Task repetition in an EFL classroom: A language socialization perspective (Unpublished postgraduate certificate dissertation). Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Kobayashi, M. (2004). A sociocultural study of second language tasks: Activity, agency, and language socialization (PhD dissertation). Retrieved from <[URL]>
(2016). L2 academic discourse socialization through oral presentation: An undergraduate students’ learning trajectory in study abroad. Canadian Modern Language Review, 71, 95–121.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lynch, T. (2018). Perform, reflect, recycle: Enhancing task repetition in second language speaking classes. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Language learning through task repetition (pp. 201–231). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lynch, T., & Maclean, J. (2000). Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4, 221–250.
(2001). ‘A case of exercising’: Effects of immediate task repetition on learners’ performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 141–162). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Lyster, R. (1998) Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48(2), 183–218.
Mercer, N. (1992). Culture, context, and the construction of knowledge in the classroom. In P. Light & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Context and cognition: Ways of learning and knowing (pp. 28–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. Abington: Routledge.
Mohan, B., & Beckett, G. H. (2003). A functional approach to research on content-based language learning: Recasts in causal explanations. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 421–432.
Mohan, B. A., & Marshall Smith, S. M. (1992). Context and cooperation in academic tasks. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Collaborative language learning and teaching (pp. 81–99). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mohan, B. A., Slater, T., Beckett, G. H., & Tong, E. (2015). Tasks, experiential learning, and meaning making activities: A functional approach. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the International Conference (pp. 157–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1984). Social constraints in laboratory and classroom tasks. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Development in social context (pp. 172–193). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nitta, R., & Baba, K. (2018). Understanding benefits of repetition from a complex dynamic systems perspective: The case of a writing task. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Language learning through task repetition (pp. 295–327). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ochs, E. (1988). Culture and language development: Language acquisition and language socialization in a Samoan village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1996). Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 407–437). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 63–103). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pinter, A. (2007). Some benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year-old children practicing with a communication task. Language Teaching Research, 11, 189–207.
Putney, L. G., Green, J., Dixon, C., Durán, R., & Yaeger, B. (2000). Consequential progressions: Exploring collective-individual development in a bilingual classroom. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 86–126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saville-Troike, M. (2003). The ethnography of communication: An introduction (3rd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Shintani, N. (2012). Repeating input-based tasks with young beginner learners. RELC Journal, 43(1), 39–51.
(2018). Mediating input-based tasks for beginner learners through task repetition: A sociocultural perspective. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Language learning through task repetition (pp. 269–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of Henry Widdowson (pp. 125–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced second language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). New York, NY: Continuum.
Ushioda, E. (2008). Motivation and good language learners. In C. Griffith (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 19–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner: Ethnography and second-language classroom research. Harlow: Longman.
(1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. Harlow: Longman.
(2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245–259). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
(2008). The ecology of language learning and sociocultural theory. In A. Creese, P. Martin, & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, Vol. 9: Ecology of language (pp. 53–65). Dordrecht: Springer.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Moore, Paul J.
Moore, Paul J.
Amelohina, Victoria, Florentina Nicolás-Conesa & Rosa M. Manchón
2020. Effects of task repetition with the aid of direct and indirect written corrective feedback. In Writing and Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 56], ► pp. 145 ff.
Bygate, Martin
Sánchez, Alberto J., Rosa M. Manchón & Roger Gilabert
2020. The effects of task repetition across modalities and proficiency levels. In Writing and Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 56], ► pp. 121 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
