Cover not available

In:Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics
Edited by Naoko Taguchi and YouJin Kim
[Task-Based Language Teaching 10] 2018
► pp. 247–263

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 10
The effects of task type and L2 proficiency on discourse appropriacy in oral task performance

 | City University of New York
 | University of Liverpool
 | University College London
 | Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Published online: 15 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10.10eki
Abstract
Conceived within the TBLT framework, the present study examined pedagogic tasks as vehicles for demonstrating L2 learners’ discourse appropriacy in oral production. Eighty ESL learners’ discourse appropriacy was measured using three pragmatically-oriented task types (complaint, refusal, and advice) across four different proficiency levels. The findings showed that, for all task types, as general proficiency increased, ratings of discourse appropriacy also increased. We found that there was a pronounced difference in discourse appropriacy between the intermediate and advanced proficiency levels, and that for learners at higher levels of proficiency, discourse appropriacy did not vary from task to task. In contrast, task type made a difference for less proficient learners in that the refusal task was particularly challenging compared with other tasks.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Literature review
    • Pragmatics in L2 pedagogy
    • Pragmatics and TBLT
    • Research questions
  • Methodology
    • Data
    • Speaking tasks
    • Tasks and analysis of discourse appropriacy
    • Data analysis procedures
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (50)
References
Babai Shishavan, H., & Sharifian, F. (2016). The refusal speech act in a cross-cultural perspective: A study of Iranian English-language learners and Anglo-Australian speakers. Language and Communication, 47, 75–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baralt, M. (2013). The impact of cognitive complexity on feedback efficacy during online versus face-to-face interactive tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 689–725. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Pragmatics and second language acquisition. In R. Kaplan (Ed.), Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 182–192). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Pragmatics in SLA. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 147–162). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning, 63, 68–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barron, A. (2006). Learning to say ‘you’ in German: The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in a study abroad context. In M. DuFon & E. Churchill (Eds.), Language learners in study abroad contexts (pp. 59–82). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beebe, L. (1995). The social rules of speaking: Basics – not frosting on the cake. The Language Teacher, 19(3), 4–11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beebe, L., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R. Scarcella, E. Andersen, & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), On the development of communicative competence in a second language (pp. 55–73). New York, NY: Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beebe, L., & Waring, H. (2005). Pragmatic development in responding to rudeness. In J. Frodesen & C. Holten (Eds.), The power of context in language teaching and learning (pp. 67–80). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeCapua, A. (1998). Pragmatic transfer and cultural stereotyping. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 9, 21–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 221–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Révész, A. (2012). Tasks and teacher feedback in the Spanish foreign language classroom. Language Learning, 62, 851–879. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haverkate, H. (1984). Speech acts, speakers and hearers (Pragmatics and Beyond 4). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwasaki, N. (2010). Style shifts among Japanese learners before and after study abroad in Japan: Becoming active social agents in Japan. Applied Linguistics, 31, 45–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, K., & Johnson, H. (1999). Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, H. -J. (2006). Providing validity evidence for a speaking test using FACETS. Teachers College Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 6 (1). From <[URL]>
Kim, Y., Payant, C., & Pearson, P. (2015). The intersection of task-based interaction, task complexity, and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 549–581. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N. (2015). Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. Modern Language Journal, 99, 656–677. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norouzian, R., & Plonsky, L. (2018). Eta- and partial eta-squared in L2 research: A cautionary review and guide to more appropriate usage. Second Language Research, 34, 257–271.
Olshtain, E., & Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Discourse analysis and language teaching. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 707–724). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24, 492–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30, 590–601. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Purpura, J. (2004). Assessing grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Révész, A. (2009). Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 437–470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Révész, A., Ekiert, M., & Torgersen, E. (2016). The effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task performance. Applied Linguistics, 37, 828–848.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Révész, A., Sachs, R., & Hama, M. (2014). The effects of task complexity and input frequency on the acquisition of the past counterfactual construction through recasts. Language Learning, 64, 615–650. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roever, C. (2009). Teaching and testing pragmatics. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 560–577). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, S., & Kasper, G. (2013). Assessing second language pragmatics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task-type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2007). Task difficulty in oral speech act production. Applied Linguistics, 28, 113–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011a). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011b). Do proficiency and study-abroad experience affect speech act production? Analysis of appropriateness, accuracy, and fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 49, 265–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011c). The effect of L2 proficiency and study-abroad experience in pragmatic comprehension. Language Learning, 61, 904–939. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Context, individual differences, and pragmatic competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48, 1–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takahashi, S. (2010). Assessing learnability in second language pragmatics. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Handbook of pragmatics (Vol. 7, pp. 391–421). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takimoto, M. (2012). Metapragmatic discussion in interlanguage pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1240–1253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 91–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints, and apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Young, R. (2011). Interactional competence in language learning, teaching, and testing. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 426–443). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Li, Shaopeng, Zehao Wang & Xianru Ge
2025. Effects of Task Complexity and L2 Proficiency on Functional Adequacy in L2 Writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 35:2 ► pp. 543 ff. DOI logo
Taguchi, Naoko, Daniel H. Dixon, Yuqing Qin & Ying Chen
2025. Pedagogic tasks in digital games: Effects of feedback conditions and individual characteristics on learning request-making. Language Teaching Research 29:5 ► pp. 2177 ff. DOI logo
Kang, Sanghee & YouJin Kim
2024. Examining the quality of mobile-assisted, video-making task outcomes: The role of proficiency, narrative ability, digital literacy, and motivation. Language Teaching Research 28:6 ► pp. 2326 ff. DOI logo
Li, Shuai
2023. Working memory and task difficulty as factors of L2 pragmatics. In L2 Pragmatics in Action [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 58], ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Ekiert, Monika, Andrea Révész, Eivind Torgersen & Emily Moss
2022. The role of pausing in L2 oral task performance. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 2:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
González-Lloret, Marta
2022. The present and future of functional adequacy. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 2:1 ► pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
Kim, YouJin
2022. The interface between instructed L2 pragmatics and TBLT research. Applied Pragmatics 4:2 ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Kuiken, Folkert & Ineke Vedder
2022. Speaking. In Research methods in instructed second language acquisition [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3], ► pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Kuiken, Folkert & Ineke Vedder
2022. Measurement of functional adequacy in different learning contexts. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 2:1 ► pp. 8 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Yow-jyy Joyce & Yeu-Ting Liu
2022. Promoting Oral Presentation Skills Through Drama-Based Tasks with an Authentic Audience: A Longitudinal Study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 31:3 ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Glaser, Karen
2020. Assessing the L2 pragmatic awareness of non-native EFL teacher candidates: Is spotting a problem enough?. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 16:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue