In:Task-Based Language Teaching: A reader
Edited by Kris Van den Branden, Martin Bygate and John M. Norris
[Task-Based Language Teaching 1] 2009
► pp. 135–142
Chapter 7. Task-based teaching and assessment
Published online: 5 March 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.1.09tas
https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.1.09tas
Dissatisfaction with conventional linguistically-based syllabuses, along with a growing understanding from research findings of how people learn second (including foreign) languages, has led since the 1980s to a number of proposals for various kinds of task-based alternatives. Examples include the procedural syllabus (Prabhu, 1987), the process syllabus (Breen, 1984), and the task syllabus (Long, 1985; Nunan, 1991; Robinson, in press; Skehan, 1998). In addition, there has been advocacy of ‘task-based’ approaches which in reality adhere to a linguistic syllabus of some kind, usually grammatical and/or lexical (see, e.g., Ellis, 1993), even if covert, as where tasks are employed in order to teach specific structures (e.g., Loschky & Bley-Vroman, 1993).
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Shahrzad Amini, Farzad Mahmoudi Largani & behnam hedayat
Oliver, Rhonda & Tatiana Bogachenko
2018. Teacher perceptions and use of tasks in school ESL classrooms. In TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy [Task-Based Language Teaching, 12], ► pp. 71 ff.
Nguyen, Minh Thi Thuy, Hanh Thi Pham & Tam Minh Pham
McAllister, Julie & Marie-Françoise Narcy-Combes
Nguyen, Thi Thuy Minh, Thi Hanh Pham & Minh Tam Pham
Starkey-Perret, Rebecca, Julie McAllister & Marie-Françoise Narcy-Combes
Buck, Jemma & Julie McAllister
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
