Article published In: Teacher Education for Task-Based Language Teaching
Edited by Xavier Gutiérrez, Lara Bryfonski and Greg Ogilvie
[TASK 5:2] 2025
► pp. 228–256
Teacher perspectives and student voices
Tasks and task design for less commonly taught language classrooms
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Michigan State University.
Published online: 5 February 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/task.25005.gor
https://doi.org/10.1075/task.25005.gor
Abstract
Task-based language teaching (TBLT) is a prominent approach in second and foreign language education (Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based
language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. ; Long, M. H. (2015). Second
language acquisition and task-based language
teaching. Wiley.). However, for
many instructors of less commonly taught languages (LCTLs) at institutions of higher education (IHE), TBLT is still an innovative
approach that deviates from more familiar structure-focused, teacher-dominated teaching methods. In a multi-year project, LCTL
instructors partnered with curriculum design experts to create task-based, proficiency-oriented lesson materials using a reverse
design framework. This study focuses on three Portuguese instructors’ understanding and application of TBLT principles and four
students’ perspectives on engaging tasks. Data sources included meeting notes, instructor interviews and student responses to a
pre- and post-course unit survey, analyzed through qualitative content analysis.
Findings revealed that although the instructors’ understanding of TBLT changed over three years of collaborative
work, they still struggled with the concept of a task and integrating grammar and vocabulary into task-based lessons. Student
feedback challenged conventional task criteria, offering insights into engaging task design features for advanced learners.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Background
- Task-based language teaching
- Research questions
- Methods
- Participants
- Data collection and analysis
- Findings and discussion
- Research question 1
- Research question 2
- Conclusion and limitations
References
References (48)
ACTFL. (2024). ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines
2024. Retrieved on 15 May
2025 from [URL]
. (2025). World-Readiness Standards
for Language Learning. Retrieved on 15
May 2025 from [URL]
Andon, N., & Eckerth, J. (2009). Chacun
à son gout? Task-based L2 pedagogy from the teacher’s point of view. International Journal of
Applied
Linguistics, 19(3), 286–310.
Blyth, C. (2013). LCTLs
and technology: The promise of open education. Language Learning &
Technology, 14(1), 1–6.
Breen, M. (1989). The
evaluation cycle for language learning tasks. In R. Johnson & M. Swain (Eds.), The
second language
curriculum (pp. 187–207). Cambridge University Press.
Brown, A. V. (2009). Less
commonly taught language and commonly taught language students: A demographic and academic
comparison. Foreign Language
Annals, 42(3), 405–423.
(2017). Position
paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward. Language
Teaching, 50(4), 507–526.
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2013). Exploring
language pedagogy through second language acquisition
research. Routledge.
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based
language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Erlam, R. (2016). “I’m
still not sure what a task is”: Teachers designing language tasks. Language Teaching
Research, 20(3), 279–299.
Erlam, R., & Tolosa, C. (2021). Pedagogical
realities of implementing task-based language teaching. John Benjamins.
Heidrich Uebel, E. & Zulick, B. (2025). Less commonly taught language instructors: An updated look at instructor profiles and needs. Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages, 381, 1–48.
Hiver, P., & Wu, J. (2023). Engagement
in TBLT. In C. Lambert, S. Aubrey, & G. Bui (Eds.), The
tole of the Learner in Task-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Research
Methods, (pp. 75–90). Routledge.
Johnston, B., & Janus, L. (2003). Teacher
professional development for the less commonly taught languages. [URL]
Kubanyiova, M. (2012). Teacher
development in action: Understanding language teachers’ conceptual change. Palgrave Macmillan.
Lambert, C. (2017). Tasks,
affect and second language performance. Language Teaching
Research, 21(6), 657–664.
(2023). Personal
investment in TBLT. In C. Lambert, S. Aubrey, & G. Bui (Eds.), The
role of the learner in task-based language teaching: Theory and research
methods (pp. 19–40). Routledge.
Lambert, C., Aubrey, S., & Bui, G. (2023). The
role of the learner in task-based language teaching. In C. Lambert, S. Aubrey, & G. Bui (Eds.), The
role of the learner in task-based language teaching: Theory and research
methods (pp. 1–15). Routledge.
Lanvers, U. (2024). Language
learning beyond English. Learner motivation in the twenty-first century. (Cambridge
Elements). Cambridge University Press.
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2024). A
practical guide to second language teaching and learning. Cambridge University Press.
Long, M. (1985). A
role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language
teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling
and assessing second language
acquisition (pp. 77–99). Multilingual Matters.
(2016). In
defense of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 361, 5–33.
Lusin, N., Peterson, T., Sulewski, C., & Zafer, R. (2023). Enrollments
in languages other than English in US institutions of higher education, fall 2021. Modern
Language Association of America. [URL]
Malicka, A., Gilabert, R. G., & Norris, J. M. (2019). From
needs analysis to task design: Insights from an English for specific purposes context. Language
Teaching
Research, 23(1), 78–106.
Nguyen, B. T., Newton, J., & Crabbe, D. (2018). Teacher
transformation of textbook tasks in Vietnamese EFL high school
classrooms. In V. Samuda, K. Van den Branden, & M. Bygate (Eds.), Task-Based
Language Teaching as a Researched
Pedagogy (pp. 51–70). John Benjamins.
PBLWorks. (2025). Gold standard PBL:
Essential project design elements. [URL]. Retrieved May 16, 2025.
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring
engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 361, 50–72.
Robinson, P. (2011). Second
language task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, language learning, and
performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second
language task complexity. Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and
performance (pp. 3–37). John Benjamins.
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Defining
pedagogic tasks: Issues and challenges. In V. Samuda & M. Bygate (Eds.), Research
and practice in applied linguistics. Tasks in second language
learning (pp. 62–70). Palgrave Macmillan.
Samuda, V., Van den Branden, K., & Bygate, M. (Eds.). (2018). TBLT
as a researched pedagogy. John Benjamins.
Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2022). The
research–practice dialogue in second language learning and teaching: Past, present, and
future. The Modern Language
Journal, 1061, 509–527.
Shintani, N. (2012). Repeating
input-based tasks with young beginner learners. RELC
Journal, 43(1), 39–51.
Skehan, P. (1996). Second
language acquisition research and task-based instruction. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge
and change in language
teaching (pp. 17–30). Macmillan Heinemann English Language Teaching.
(2014). Processing
perspectives on task performance. John Benjamins.
Timpe-Laughlin, V., Roters, B., & Butler, Y. G. (2024). Exploring
the idea of task in the context of the young language learner classroom. ETS Research Report
Series, 2024(1), 1–52.
Van den Branden, K. (Ed.). (2006). Task-based
language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
(2022). How
to teach an additional language. To task or not to task? John Benjamins.
Van den Branden, K., & Van Gorp, K. (2021). Implementing
task-based language education in primary education: Lessons learnt from the Flemish
experience. Language Teaching for Young
learners, 3(1), 3–27.
Vandommele, G., Van Gorp, K., & Van den Branden, K. (2018). Task-based
language teaching: How task-based is it really? A case study into the use of tasks by more experienced and less experienced
teachers. In V. Samuda, K. Van den Branden & M. Bygate (Eds.), Task-based
language yeaching as a researched
pedagogy (pp. 165–197). John Benjamins.
Van Gorp, K., Heidrich Uebel, E., & Giupponi, L. (2025). Collaboration
and curriculum development: The design of flexible modules in the Less Commonly Taught Languages
Partnership. In A. R. Corin, C. Campbell & B. L. Leaver (Eds.), Open
architecture curricular design in world language
education (pp. 139–149). Georgetown University Press.
Van Gorp, K., Van den Branden, K., Newton, J., & Coss, M. D. (2024). Talking It Through with Teachers: Jonathan Newtonșs Reflections on Coursebooks, Challenges, and Opportunities for TBLT. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 152-162.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding
by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA.
