Cover not available

Article published In: TASK
Vol. 5:1 (2025) ► pp.115–143

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Describing and interpreting task performance using a register functional approach

ORCiD logo with link | Northern Arizona University, USA
ORCiD logo with link | Northern Arizona University, USA | Texas Tech University, USA
Published online: 8 August 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/task.24003.cra
Abstract
This paper illustrates how the description of tasks and task performances can benefit from a methodological and interpretative framework called the Register Functional (RF) approach. The paper first discusses research goals, conceptions of context and linguistic interpretation of task performances in TBLT and the RF approach and then provides a sample study that analyzes two different tasks with respect to methods used in some TBLT research and an RF approach to task description and performance. We then illustrate how the RF approach can be used to functionally interpret lexico-grammatical variation by reference to specific situational characteristics of tasks that allow for linguistic interpretation. The paper ends with a discussion of how the RF approach can aid TBLT issues such as language development, task as process vs. task as workplan, and communicative adequacy.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Task based language teaching and the register functional approach
  • An example study
    • Participants
    • The tasks
  • Analysis of performances
  • Discussion
  • Note
  • References
References (61)
References
Alquaraishi, M. (2020). Studying linguistic variation in interactive spoken assessment tasks and its relation to task characteristics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
Becker, A. (2021). Exploring multiple profiles of highly collaborative paired oral tasks in an L2 speaking test of English. In W. Crawford (Ed.). Multiple perspective on learner interaction: The corpus of collaborative oral tasks (pp. 81–122). Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019). Register, genre, and style (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B., Staples, S., & Egbert, J. (2022). The register-functional approach to grammatical complexity: Theoretical foundation, descriptive research findings, application. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman. Also published as Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2021). Grammar of spoken and written English. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breen, M. (1989). The evaluation cycle for language learning tasks. In R. K. Johnson (Eds.), The second language curriculum (pp. 187–206). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 21–46). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis, & D. Willis (Eds.). Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 136–146). Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bygate, M., Samuda, V., & Van den Branden, K. (2021). A pedagogical rationale for task-based language teaching for the acquisition of real-world language use. In M. J. Ahmadian & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of task-based language teaching (pp. 27–50). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byrnes, H. (2002). The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate foreign language curriculum. Language Testing, 19(4), 419–437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Theorizing language development at the intersection of ‘task’ and L2 writing Reconsidering complexity. In H. Byrnes & R. Manchón (Eds.). Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 79–103). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R. (2014). Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing. An introduction. In H. Byrnes & R. Manchón (Eds.). Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 1–23). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crawford, W., McDonough, K., & Brun-Mercer, N. (2019). Identifying linguistic markers of collaboration in L2 peer interaction: A lexico-grammatical approach. TESOL Quarterly, 531, 180–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crawford, W. J., & Zhang, M. (2021). How can register analysis inform task-based language teaching?. Register Studies, 3(2), 180–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). A linguistic analysis of task as process and its implications for task as workplan. Presented at American Association of Applied Linguists. Portland, OR.
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment — Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing. Retrieved on 25 March 2025 from [URL]
Csomay, E. (2005). Linguistic variation within university classroom talk: A corpus-based perspective. Linguistics and Education, 15(3), 243–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Jong, N., Steinel, M., Florijn, A., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. (2012). The effect of task complexity on functional adequacy, fluency and lexical diversity in speaking performances of native and nonnative speakers. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency. Investigating complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA. (pp. 121–142). John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egbert, J., & Biber, D. (2023). Key feature analysis: A simple, yet powerful method for comparing text varieties. Corpora 18(1), 121–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Investigating performance of tasks. In R. Ellis (Ed.). Language teaching research & language pedagogy (pp. 196–235). Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2005). The effects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.). Planning and task performance in a second language (167–192). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, P. (1996). Doing the task better: How planning time influences students’ performance. In J. Willis, & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 126–135). Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics 21(3), 354–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & IATBLT (n.d.). The TBLT Language Learning Task Bank. [URL]
Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishikawa, T. (2007). The effects of manipulating task complexity along the [+/- here and now] dimension on L2 written narrative discourse. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.). Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 136–156). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2013). The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction? System, 41(3), 829–840. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2011). Task complexity and linguistic performance in L2 writing and speaking. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 91–104). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambert, K. & Kormos, J. (2016). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in task-based L2 research: Toward more developmentally based measures of second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 35(5), 607–614. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 261, 27–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LxGrTgr. (n.d.). Retrieved on 16 January 2025 from [URL]
Manchón, R. (2014). The internal dimension of tasks: The interaction between task factors and learner factors in bringing about learning through writing. In H. Byrnes & R. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 27–52). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics 30/41: 590–601. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.). Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–34). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). Task-based learner production: A substantive and methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 73–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polat, B., & Kim, Y. (2014). Dynamics of complexity and accuracy: A longitudinal case study of advanced untutored development. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 184–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qin, J. (2022). Potential contribution of SFL to task-based research: An examination of planning effects using genre-based theme analysis. System 1041, 102695. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qin, J., & Lei, L. (2022). Research trends in task-based language teaching: A bibliometric analysis from 1985 to 2020. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 12(3), 381–404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reppen, R. (2012). Grammar and beyond. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 451, 193–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). The Cognition Hypothesis, second language task demands, and the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference (pp.87–122). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, P., Cadierno, T., & Shirai, Y. (2009). Time and motion: Measuring the effects of the conceptual demands of tasks on second language speech production. Applied Linguistics, 301, 533–554. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roever, C., & Kasper, G. (2018). Speaking in turns and sequences: Interactional competence as a target construct in testing speaking. Language Testing, 35(3), 331–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sangarun, J. (2005). The effects of focusing on meaning and form in strategic planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.). Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 111–142). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Tasks and language performance assessment. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.). Researching pedagogic tasks second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 167–185). Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Limited attentional capacity and cognition: Two hypotheses regarding second language performance on tasks. In M. Bygate (Ed.). Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. (pp. 123–155) John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spada, N. (2021). Reflecting on task-based language teaching from an Instructed SLA perspective. Language Teaching, 55(1), 74–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2007). Writing tasks: The effects of collaboration. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.). Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 157–177). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samuda, V. & Bygate, M. (2021). Exploring the Nuts and Bolts of Task Design. In M. J. Ahmadian & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching. (pp. 262-289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2007). Task difficulty in oral speech act production, Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 113–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output, Language Learning, 581, 439–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. (Eds.). (2009). Task-based language teaching: A reader. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Zhao, Xinyu, William J. Crawford & Hua Chen
2025. The Effects of Communicative Purposes on Lexicogrammatical Variation in EFL Prepared Public Speech: A Register‐Functional Approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue