Chinese EFL teachers’ understandings and implementation of task-based language teaching
A multiple case study
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with University College London.
Published online: 11 March 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/task.22015.li
https://doi.org/10.1075/task.22015.li
Abstract
Across China, English language teaching curricula have advocated for task-based language teaching (TBLT) for more
than 20 years. Yet, there is reason to believe that practice varies widely. As such, this multiple case study sheds light on two
Chinese teachers’ understandings and implementation of TBLT in a public primary school in Chongqing, southwest China. Data
collection consisted of eight semi-structured interviews and eight classroom observations. Data were analyzed using qualitative
content analysis. The analysis indicated that the teachers had basic understandings of TBLT, but their teaching was incongruent
with its principles. Few tasks were observed in their lessons. Three main factors affected the teachers’ implementation of TBLT:
(1) classroom management issues; (2) preparation and teaching resources; and (3) the teachers’ own tacit reluctance.
Keywords: TBLT, theory-to-practice, case study, qualitative content analysis, ELT China
Article outline
- Introduction
- Literature review
- The development of TBLT
- The notion of a ‘task’
- Uptake of ELT curriculum innovation in the Chinese EFL context
- Similar TBLT research in Hong Kong
- Similar TBLT research in mainland China
- Similar TBLT research in less-developed cities in China
- Methods
- Research design
- Research setting
- Participants
- Data collection
- Classroom observations
- Interviews
- Data analysis
- Findings and discussion
- RQ1: Task implementation in observed classes
- Jiadong’s classes
- Xiaoyu’s classes
- RQ2: Understandings of TBLT and tasks
- General understandings of TBLT
- Tasks should be feasible and effective
- Tasks should involve communication and problem solving
- Tasks should be authentic
- Tasks should not be limited in language form
- RQ3: Three main factors affecting TBLT implementation
- Classroom management
- Preparation and teaching resources
- Teachers’ tacit reluctance to implement TBLT
- RQ1: Task implementation in observed classes
- Concluding discussion
References
References (74)
An, J., & Thomas, N. (2021). Students’
beliefs about the role of interaction for science learning and language learning in EMI science classes: Evidence from high
schools in China. Linguistics and
Education, 651, 100972.
Bruton, A. (2005). Task-based
language teaching: For the state secondary FL classroom? Language Learning
Journal, 31(1), 55–68.
Bryfonski, L. (2021). From
task-based training to task-based instruction: Novice language teachers’ experiences and
perspectives. Language Teaching Research.
Butler, Y. (2011). The
implementation of communicative and Task-Based Language Teaching in the Asia-Pacific
region. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 311, 36–57.
(2015). English
language education among young learners in East Asia: A review of current research
(2004–2014). Language
Teaching, 48(3), 303–342.
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.). (2001). Researching
pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and
testing. Longman.
Byrnes, H. (2015). Linking
‘tasks’ and curricular thinking: An affirmation of the TBLT educational
agenda. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains
and directions in the development of
TBLT (pp. 193–224). John Benjamins.
Candlin, C. (1987). Towards
task-based language learning. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language
learning
tasks (pp. 5–22). London: Prentice Hall.
Carless, D. (1999). Factors
affecting classroom implementation: Task-based curriculum renewal in Hong Kong. International
Journal of Educational
Reform, 8(4), 374–382.
(2003). Factors
in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary
schools. System, 31(4), 485–500.
(2004). Issues
in teachers’ re-interpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL
Quarterly, 38(4), 639–662.
(2007). The
suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong
Kong. System, 35(4), 595–608.
(2009). Revisiting
the TBLT versus P-P-P debate: Voices from Hong Kong. Asian Journal of English Language
Teaching, 191, 49–66.
Chen, Q., & Wright, C. (2017). Contextualization
and authenticity in TBLT: Voices from Chinese classrooms. Language Teaching
Research, 21(4), 517–538.
Cheng, V. M. Y. (2010). Tensions
and dilemmas of teachers in creativity reform in a Chinese context. Thinking Skills and
Creativity, 5(3), 120–137.
Ciornei, S. I., & Dina, T. A. (2015). Authentic
texts in teaching English. Procedia-Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 1801, 274–279.
Deng, C., & Carless, D. R. (2009). The
communicativeness of activities in a task-based innovation in Guangdong, China. Asian Journal
of English Language
teaching, 191, 113–134.
(2010). Examination
preparation or effective teaching: Conflicting priorities in the implementation of a pedagogic
innovation. Language Assessment
Quarterly, 7(4), 285–302.
Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (1986). “Information
gap” tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL
Quarterly, 201, 305–325.
(2010). Second
language acquisition and language teaching materials. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English
language teaching materials: Theory and
practice (pp. 33–57). Cambridge University Press.
(2013). Task-based
language teaching: responding to the critics. University of Sydney Papers in
TESOL, 81, 1–27.
(2017). Task-based
language teaching. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Ed.), The
Routledge handbook of instructed second language
acquisition (pp. 108–125). Routledge.
(2021). Options
in a task-based language-teaching curriculum: An educational perspective. TASK: Journal on
Task-Based Language Teaching and
Learning, 1(1), 11–46.
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring
language pedagogy through second language acquisition
research. Routledge.
Erlam, R. (2016). ‘I’m
still not sure what a task is’: Teachers designing language tasks. Language Teaching
Research, 201, 279–299.
González-Lloret, M., & Ortega, L. (Eds.). (2014). Technology-mediated
TBLT: Researching technology and tasks. John Benjamins.
Hu, G. W. (2002). Potential
cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of CLT in China. Language, Culture and
Curriculum, 15(2), 93–105.
(2005a). Contextual
influences on instructional practices: A Chinese case for an ecological approach to ELT. TESOL
Quarterly, 39(4), 635–660.
(2005b). English
language education in China: Policies, progress, and problems. Language
Policy, 4(1), 5–24.
Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (2002). English
language teaching in China: A bridge to the future. Asia Pacific Journal of
Education, 22(2), 53–64.
Kessler, M., Solheim, I., & Zhao, M. (2021). Can
task-based language teaching be “authentic” in foreign language contexts? Exploring the case of
China. TESOL
Journal, 12(1), e00534.
Li, D. (1998). “It’s
always more difficult than you plan and imagine”: Teachers’ perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach
in South Korea. TESOL
Quarterly, 32(4), 677–703.
Littlewood, W. (2004). The
task-based approach: Some questions and suggestions. ELT
Journal, 58(4), 319–326.
(2007). Communicative
and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language
Teaching, 40(2), 243–249.
(2011). Communicative
langage teaching: An expanding concept for a changing world. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook
of research in second language teaching and
learning (Vol. 21, pp. 541–557). Routledge.
Liu, S., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2012). Chinese
teachers’ work stress and their turnover intention. International Journal of Educational
Research, 531, 160–170.
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2021). Exploring
the relationship between TBLT and ISLA. TASK: Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and
Learning, 1(1), 47–70.
Ministry of Education. (2001). National
English curriculum standards for nine-year compulsory education and senior high school
education. People’s Education Press.
. (2011). National
English curriculum standards for nine-year compulsory education and senior high school
education. People’s Education Press.
Oliver, R., & Bogachenko, T. (2018). Teacher
perceptions and use of tasks in school. In V. Samuda, K. Van den Branden, & M. Bygate (Eds.), TBLT
as a Researched
Pedagogy. (pp. 72–95). John Benjamins.
Olney, A., Risko, E. F., D’Mello, S. K., & Graesser, A. C. (2015). Attention
in educational contexts: The role of the learning task in guiding
attention. In J. Fawcett, E. F. Risko, & A. Kingstone (Eds.), The
handbook of
attention (pp. 623–642). The MIT Press.
Pun, J., Thomas, N., & Bowen, N. E. J. A. (2022). Questioning
the sustainability of English-medium instruction policy in science classrooms: Teachers’ and students’ experiences at a Hong
Kong secondary
school. Sustainability, 14(2), 2168.
Rose, H., McKinley, J., & Briggs Baffoe-Djan, J. (2020). Data
collection research methods in applied
linguistics. Bloomsbury.
Selvi, A. F. (2020). Qualitative
content analysis. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of research methods in applied
linguistics (pp. 440–452). Routledge.
Solares-Altamirano, M. (2020). Teachers’
responses to an online course on task-based language teaching in
Mexico. In C. Lambert & R. Oliver (Eds.), Using
tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse
contexts (pp. 193–214). Multilingual Matters.
Spada, N. (2007). Communicative
language teaching: Current status and future prospects. In J. Cummins & C. Davis (Eds.), The
international handbook of
English (pp. 271–288). Springer.
Swan, M. (2005). Legislation
by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied
Linguistics, 26(3), 376–401.
Thomas, N., & Brereton, P. (2019). Practitioners
respond to Michael Swan’s ‘Applied linguistics: A consumer’s view’. Language
Teaching, 52(2), 275–278.
Van den Branden, K., & Van Gorp, K. (2021). Introducing
TASK: Editors’ preface to the first edition of TASK. TASK: Journal on Task-Based Language
Teaching and
Learning, 1(1), 1–10.
Wang, Q. (2007). The
National Curriculum changes and their effects on English language teaching in the People’s Republic of
China. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International
handbook of English language
teaching (pp. 87–105). Springer Science & Business.
Young, M. S., Robinson, S., & Alberts, P. (2009). Students
pay attention! Combating the vigilance decrement to improve learning during lectures. Active
Learning in Higher
Education, 10(1), 44–55.
Zhang, Y. E. (2005). The
implementation of the task-based approach in primary school English language teaching in mainland
China (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Zhang, Y., & Yu, Y. (2007). Causes
for burnout among secondary and elementary school teachers and preventive strategies. Chinese
Education &
Society, 40(5), 78–85.
Zheng, X., & Adamson, B. (2003). The
pedagogy of a secondary school teacher of English in the People’s Republic of China: Changing the
stereotypes. RELC
Journal, 341, 323–337.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Zhang, Chi, Neil E.J.A. Bowen & Nathan Thomas
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
