Review article published In: The Assessment of Functional Adequacy in Language Performance: Special issue of the Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 2:1 (2022)
Edited by Folkert Kuiken and Ineke Vedder
[TASK 2:1] 2022
► pp. 1–7
Introduction
The assessment of functional adequacy in language performance
This article is available free of charge.
Published online: 20 June 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/task.21009.kui
https://doi.org/10.1075/task.21009.kui
Article outline
- Assessment of functional adequacy: Rationale and objectives
- Overview of the volume
References
References (13)
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European
framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
De Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A. F., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). The
effect of task complexity on functional adequacy, fluency and lexical diversity in speaking performances of native and
non-native speakers. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions
of L2 performance and proficiency. Complexity, accuracy and fluency in
SLA (pp. 121–142). John Benjamins.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic
and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Speech
acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Hulstijn, J. H., Schoonen, R., de Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., & Florijn, A. (2012). Linguistic
competences of learners of Dutch as a second language at the B1 and B2 levels of speaking proficiency of the Common European
Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Language
Testing, 29(2), 203–221.
Knoch, U. (2009). Diagnostic
assessment of writing: A comparison of two rating scales. Language
Testing, 26(2), 275–304.
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2014). Rating
written performance: What do raters do and why? Language
Testing, 31(3), 329–348.
(2017). Functional
adequacy in L2 writing. Towards a new rating scale. Language
Testing, 34(3), 321–336.
(2018). Assessing
functional adequacy of L2 performance in a task-based
approach. In N. Taguchi & Y-J. Kim (Eds.), Task-based
approaches to assessing
pragmatics (pp. 265–286). John Benjamins.
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic
complexity measures and their relationships to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2
writing. Applied
Linguistics, 24(4), 492–518.
Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF:
Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied
Linguistics, 30(4), 590–601.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Guzmán-Alcón, Irene
Kim, Miseong & Phil Hiver
Lu, Xiaojun & Yui Suzukida
Michel, Marije, Iryna Bazhutkina, Niklas Abel & Carola Strobl
Sadeghi, Michael, Reza Yadollahpour & Mostafa Pourhaji
Wu, May y. & Marije Michel
Koizumi, Rie & Yo In'nami
Kuiken, Folkert & Ineke Vedder
2022. Speaking. In Research methods in instructed second language acquisition [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3], ► pp. 329 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
