Cover not available

Article published In: Teacher Education for Task-Based Language Teaching
Edited by Xavier Gutiérrez, Lara Bryfonski and Greg Ogilvie
[TASK 5:2] 2025
► pp. 285–315

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

A qualitative and quantitative preliminary analysis of a task design web-based tool and its applications for teacher education

ORCiD logo with link | University of Barcelona, Spain
ORCiD logo with link | University of Barcelona, Spain
ORCiD logo with link | University of Barcelona, Spain
ORCiD logo with link | University of Barcelona, Spain
ORCiD logo with link | International University of Catalonia, Spain
ORCiD logo with link | Open University of Catalonia, Spain
ORCiD logo with link | Open University of Catalonia, Spain
ORCiD logo with link | Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain
Published online: 5 February 2026
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/task.00041.gil
Abstract
Task-based language teaching (TBLT) has been consolidated as a research-based teaching perspective over the last four decades. At its core, task and materials design have been identified as key to successful task-based implementation (Bryfonski, forthcoming). Yet teachers are often left to their own resources when it comes to actual design. The taskGen project has brought together knowledge from second language acquisition, Natural Language Processing (NLP), interaction design, design thinking, and computer engineering to provide a solution to the problem. The goal of this article is threefold: firstly, a brief historical overview contextualizes the issue of task design in TBLT from complementary cognitive and teacher education perspectives; secondly, a web-based tool is presented that assists and trains teachers to design, organize, automate and share tasks. TaskGen assists the design of task structure through pre-tasks, tasks, and post-tasks, while focus on form is achieved through NLP tools. Tasks can be cloned to create simple or more complex versions, and they can also be shared and cloned by other teachers/designers. Thirdly, results from a qualitative study and a quantitative one are analyzed and presented. The former taps into teachers’ perceptions of task design by showing the kind of mental processes involved in decision-making during task design. The latter draws on big data on tool use by teachers, and it measures the impact of training with the tool on teachers’ choices during task design. Overall results of the two studies illustrate the cyclical nature of task design, the central role of focus on form, and the need for task design to be integrated in teacher education in order to achieve its full potential.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Task design and its applications
  • The problem and the tool
  • The piloting of taskGen
    • Overall approach and types of analyses
    • Qualitative study
    • Quantitative study
      • Teachers and recruitment
      • Instruments
      • Procedures
      • Preliminary results
  • Discussion
  • Limitations and future research
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (44)
References
Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, P., & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks. Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 23–48). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dekeyser, R. M. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 125–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). (Eds.). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Foundational principles of task-based language teaching. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erlam, R. (2016). ‘I’m still not sure what a task is’: Teachers designing language task. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 279–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilabert, R., Manchón, R. M., & Vasylets, O. (2016). Mode in theoretical and empirical TBLT research: Advancing research agendas. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 117–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, D., & Suethanapornkul, S. (2013). The cognition hypothesis: A synthesis and meta-analysis of research on second language task complexity. Language Learning, 63(2), 330–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (2017). Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 371, 13–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jordan, J., & Long, M. H. (2022). English language teaching now and how it could be. Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laurillard, D., Kennedy, E., Charlton, P., Wild, J., & Dimakopoulos, D. (2018). Using technology to develop teachers as designers of TEL: Evaluating the learning designer. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 1044–1058. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77–79). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackey, A. (2020). Interaction, feedback and task research in second language learning: Methods and design. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning. Integrating theory and practice (pp. 91–34.) Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qi, P., Zhang, Y., Bolton, J., & Manning, C. D. (2020). Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languages. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System demonstrations (pp. 101–108), Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (1995). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45(1), 99–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.). Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). The cognition hypothesis, task design and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21(2), 45–107.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salama, M., Michel, M., Rousse-Malpat, A., & Verspoor, M. (2022). Making the case for dynamic usage-based TBLT [Conference presentation]. 9th International Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching, Broadening the Horizon of TBLT, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2019). Do teachers care about research? The research-pedagogy dialogue. ELT Journal, 73(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smits, T. F. H., Oberhofer, M., & Colpaert, J. (2016). Mind the gap: Task design and technology in novice language teachers’ practice. In S. Papadima-Sophocleous, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL communities and culture — Short term paper from EUROCALL 20161 (pp. 429–434). Research-publishing.net. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50(1), 158–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y. (2016). Collaborative dialogue in learning pragmatics: Pragmatic-related episodes as an opportunity for learning request-making. Applied Linguistics, 371, 416–437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics: An overview. In N. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics (pp. 1–26). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trager, V., & Gilabert, R. (2025). Integrating digital tools in task design: Insights from primary school EFL teachers. Language Teaching Research, 0(0). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K. (2006a). Training teachers: Task-based as well? In K. Van den Branden, Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 217–247). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006b). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Someren, M., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical approach to modelling cognitive. Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, Y. (2020). Implementing tasks in young learners’ language classrooms: A collaborative teacher education initiative through task evaluation. Language Teaching Research, 26(3), 530–551. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziegler, N., & González-Lloret, M. (2023). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and technology (pp. 1–5). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue