Bangladeshi EAP teachers’ perspectives on task-based language teaching
Published online: 11 March 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/task.00023.sid
https://doi.org/10.1075/task.00023.sid
Abstract
We explored the extent to which academic English teachers from
an English-as-a-Foreign-Language (EFL) context held beliefs that aligned with
Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) principles, as well as their levels of
receptiveness to using tasks in the classroom. In this mixed methods study, 41
tertiary-level EFL teachers from Bangladesh were invited to take a survey on TBLT and
participate in follow-up interviews. We used convergent mixed methods analysis
to triangulate the data and verify the findings. Results showed that
participants agreed with TBLT principles from a moderate to high level, and
consistently favored use of tasks over traditional activities, which included
audio-lingual and form-based instruction. Moreover, teacher beliefs and
practices seemed to have become further aligned with TBLT tenets in light of the
COVID-19 pandemic and its consequential shift to online teaching.
Article outline
- Literature review
- Core crinciples of TBLT
- Definition of task
- TBLT vs TSLT
- Methodological principles underlying TBLT
- TBLT in EFL contexts
- TBLT in EAP courses
- The need for this study
- Core crinciples of TBLT
- Methods
- Participants
- Study context
- Questionnaire
- Likert-Scale Survey
- Preferred Activities Survey
- Background information
- Interviews
- Procedure
- Data analysis
- Results
- Results from quantitative analysis
- Descriptive statistics from Likert-scale survey
- Descriptive statistics from Preferred Activities Survey
- Results from qualitative analysis
- Thematic coding of Preferred-Activity Survey rationales
- Thematic coding of semi-structured interviews
- Further results
- Results from quantitative analysis
- Discussion
- Research question 1
- Research Question 2
- Impact of virtual classes on teaching approaches
- Implications and recommendations
- Limitations and future directions
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (40)
Barnard, R., & Nguyen, G. V. (2010). Task-based
language teaching (TBLT): A Vietnamese case study using narrative frames to
elicit teachers’ beliefs. Language Education
in
Asia, 1(1), 77–86.
Beare, K. (2020, August 27). How
many people learn English? [URL]
Carless, D. (2007). The
suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives
from Hong
Kong. System, 35(4), 595–608.
Chen, Q., & Wright, C. (2017). Contextualization
and authenticity in TBLT: Voices from Chinese
classrooms. Language Teaching
Research, 21(4), 517–538.
Chowdhury, R., & Le Ha, P. (2008). Reflecting
on Western TESOL training and communicative language teaching: Bangladeshi
teachers’ voices. Asia Pacific Journal of
Education, 28(3), 305–316.
Comer, W. (2007). Implementing
task-based teaching from the ground up: Considerations for lesson planning
and classroom practice. Russian Language
Journal, 571, 181–203. [URL]
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research
design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches (5th
ed.). Sage.
Dao, H., & Newton, J. (2021). TBLT
perspectives on teaching from an EFL textbook at a Vietnam
university. Canadian Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 24(2), 99–126.
Douglas, S. R., & Kim, M. (2015). Task-based
language teaching and English for academic purposes: An investigation into
instructor perceptions and practice in the Canadian
context. TESL Canada
Journal, 31(8), 1–22.
Duong, T. M., & Nguyen, H. T. T. (2021). Implementing
Task-Based Language Teaching in Vietnamese secondary schools: What hinders
EFL
teachers? TESL-EJ, 25(2), 1–15. [URL]
Ellis, R. (2017). Position
paper: Moving task-based language teaching
forward. Language
Teaching, 50(4), 507–526.
(2019). Towards
a modular language curriculum for using
tasks. Language Teaching
Research, 23(4), 454–475.
(2021). Options
in a task-based language-teaching curriculum: An educational
perspective. Task, 1(1), 11–46.
Erlam, R. (2016). ‘I’m
still not sure what a task is’: Teachers designing language
tasks. Language Teaching
Research, 20(3), 279–299.
Finstad, K. (2010). Response
interpolation and scale sensitivity: Evidence against 5-point
scales. Journal of User
Experience, 5(3), 104–110. [URL]
Hillman, K. K., & Long, M. H. (2020). A
task-based needs analysis for US foreign service officers: The challenge of
the Japanese celebration
speech. In C. Lambert & R. Oliver (Eds.), Using
tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse
contexts (pp.123–145). Multilingual Matters.
Hu, R. (2013). Task-based
language teaching: Responses from Chinese teachers of
English. TESL-EJ, 16(4). [URL]
Huang, D. (2016). A
study on the application of task-based language teaching method in a
comprehensive English class in China. Journal
of Language Teaching and
Research, 7(1), 118–127.
Jamil, M. G., & Rahman, K. M. (2021). Future
directions for research-based academic English education at EFL
universities. In S. Sultana, M. M. Roshid, Z. Haider, M. N. Kabir, & M. H. Khan (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of English language education in
Bangladesh (pp. 96–111). Routledge.
Kim, Y., Jung, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2017). Implementation
of a localized task-based course in an EFL context: A study of students’
evolving perceptions. TESOL
Quarterly, 51(3), 632–660.
Li, D. (1998). “It’s
always more difficult than you plan and imagine”: Teachers’ perceived
difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South
Korea. TESOL
Quarterly, 32(4), 677–703.
Light, J., & Ranta, L. (2016). Where
good pedagogical ideas come from: The story of an EAP
task. TESL Canada
Journal, 33(2), 59–68.
Liu, Y., & Ren, W. (2021). Task-based
language teaching in a local EFL context: Chinese university teachers’
beliefs and practices. Language Teaching
Research.
Long, M. H. (2009). Methodological
principles for language
teaching. In M. H. Long & C. H. Doughty (Eds.), The
handbook of language
teaching (pp. 373–394). Blackwell.
(2016). In
defense of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real
issues. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 361, 5–33.
McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W. (2007). Teachers’
and learners’ reactions to a task based EFL course in
Thailand. TESOL
Quarterly, 41(1), 107–132.
Siddiqui, T., & Winke, P. (2023). Supplemental
file for Siddiqui, T. & Winke, P. (2023). Bangladeshi
EAP teachers’ perspectives on Task-Based Language
Teaching. [Materials
deposit.] Humanities Commons.
Skehan, P. (1996). Second
language acquisition research and task-based
instruction. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge
and change in language
teaching (pp.17–30). Heinemann.
Thi, N. A., Jaspaert, K., & Van den Branden, K. (2018). EFL
teachers’ perceptions of task-based language teaching in a Vietnamese
university. European Journal of Applied
Linguistics and
TEFL, 7(1), 73–90.
Van den Branden, K. (2016). Task-based
language teaching. The Routledge handbook of
English language
teaching (pp. 238–251). Routledge.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities
of practice: Learning, meaning, and
identity. Cambridge University Press.
World
Bank. (2019). Bangladesh
tertiary education sector review: Skills and innovation for
growth. World Bank. [URL]
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
