Options in a task-based language-teaching curriculum
An educational perspective
Published online: 27 May 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/task.00002.ell
https://doi.org/10.1075/task.00002.ell
Abstract
I draw on the education literature to describe four educational curriculum models, which serve as a basis for presenting
four TBLT curricula based on the proposals of Prabhu, N. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press.; Willis, J. (1996). A Framework for task-based language teaching. Longman., Long (Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Multilingual Matters., (2015a). Second Language Acquisition and Task-based Language Teaching. Wiley-Blackwell., (2015b). TBLT: Building the road as we travel. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 1–26). John Benjamins. ) and myself ( (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press. and (2019). Towards a modular curriculum for using tasks. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 454–475. ) – all of which have figured in the development of TBLT. I propose a set of questions that can be used to
evaluate these models. I then turn to examine the curriculum design process, identifying options in TBLT curricula that are available at
each stage of the process. I point to a tension that exists between what SLA theory indicates is needed and what environmental constraints
make feasible and conclude with a plea for flexibility by weighing up which options are appropriate in different teaching situations. I also
summarize how I see TBLT benefitting from adopting a broad education perspective that includes critical language pedagogy.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Curriculum models in education
- Curriculum as a product
- Process curriculum model
- Curriculum and critical pedagogy
- Task-based language teaching curricula
- Prabu’s (1987) communicational language teaching project
- Long’s task-based curriculum model
- Willis’ framework for task-based learning
- Ellis’ modular curriculum
- General comment
- Options in the design of a curriculum
- Considering the environment
- Discovering needs
- Following principles
- Determining goals
- Selection and sequencing of content
- Finding a format and presenting materials
- Assessment
- Program evaluation
- Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (90)
Azarnoosh, M., Zeraatpishe, M., Faravani, A., & Kargozari, H. (Eds.) Issues in material development. Sense Publishers.
Baralt, M., & Gomez, J. (2017). Task-based language teaching online: A guide for teachers. Language Learning & Technology, 211, 28–43. [URL]
Basturkmen, H. (2006). Ideas and options in English for specific purposes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Benesch, S. (1996). Needs analysis and curriculum development in EAP: An example of a critical approach. TESOL Quarterly, 301, 723–738.
Breen, M. (1984). Process syllabuses for the language classroom. In C. Brumfit (Ed.). General English syllabus design (ELT Documents 118, pp. 47–60). British Council and Pergamon.
Brumfit, C. (1984a). Communicative methodology in language teaching: The roles of accuracy and fluency. Cambridge University Press.
(1984b). Function and structure in a state school syllabus for learners of second or foreign languages with heterogeneous needs. In C. Brumfit (Ed.). General English syllabus design. (ELT Documents 118, pp. 70–82). British Council and Pergamon.
Bryfonski, L., & McKay, T. (2017). TBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 231, 603–632.
Byrnes, H. (2015). Linking ‘tasks’ and curricular thinking: An affirmation of the TBLT educational agenda. In M. Bygate (Ed.). Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 193–224). John Benjamins.
Da Silva, L. (2020). Critical tasks in action: The role of the teacher in the implementation of tasks designed from a critical perspective. Ilha de Desterro, 731, 109–127.
DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42–63). Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, C. & Willis, J. (Eds.). (2005). Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching. Palgrave Macmillan.
Ellis, R. (1993). Second language acquisition and the structural syllabus. TESOL Quarterly, 271, 91–113.
(2015). Teachers evaluating tasks. In M. Bygate (Ed.). Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 247–270). John Benjamins.
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University press.
Faravani, A., & Zeraaatpishe, M. (2016). Selection and gradation in materials development. In M. Azarnoosh, M. Zeraatpishe, A. Faravani, & H. Kargozari (Eds.) Issues in materials development (pp. 43–56). Sense Publishers.
Freire, P. (1970). Cultural action for freedom (Harvard Educational Review Monograph Series, 1). Harvard Education Press.
Freire, P. (with Macedo, D.). (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum Press. (Original work published 1970)
Gonzalez-Lloret, M., & Nielson, K. (2015). Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching Research, 191, 525–549.
Greenwood, J. (1985). Bangalore revisited: A reluctant complaint. English language Teaching, 391, 268–73.
Harris, J. (2018). Responding to critics: Implementation of TBLT in Japan. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 81, 139–148.
Kim, J., Jung, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2017). Implementation of a localized task-based course in an EFL context: A study of students’ evolving perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 511, 632–660.
Konoeda, K., & Watanabe, Y. (2008). Task-based critical pedagogy in Japanese EFL classrooms. In M. Montero, C. Miller, & J. L. Watzke (Eds.), Readings in language studies (Vol. 11, pp. 45–61). International Society for Language Studies.
Lai, C. (2015). Task-based language teaching in the Asian context: Where are we now and where are we going? In M. Thomas & H. Reinders. (Eds.), Contemporary task-based teaching in Asia (pp. 12–29). Bloomsbury.
Liakina, N., & Michaud, G. (2018). Needs analysis for task-based curriculum design: How useful can it be for general purposes L2 courses? Nouvelle Review Synergies Canada, 111, 1–12.
Lambert, C. (2010). A task-based needs analysis: Putting principles into practice. Language Teaching Research, 141, 99–112.
Leaver, B., & Willis, J. (Eds.). (2004). Task-Based Instruction in foreign language education: Practices and programs. Georgetown University Press.
Littlewood, W. (2014). Communication-oriented teaching: where are we now? Where do we go from here? Language Teaching, 47(3), 349–362.
Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Multilingual Matters.
(1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins.
(2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In M. Long (Ed.). Second language needs analysis. (pp. 1–16). Cambridge University Press.
(2015b). TBLT: Building the road as we travel. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 1–26). John Benjamins.
(2016). In defense of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 5–33.
Long, M., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 261, 27–56.
Long, M., & Norris, J. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In M. Byram (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 597–603). Routledge.
Malicka, A., Gilabert Guerrero, R., & Norris, J. (2019). From needs analysis to task design: Insights from an English for specific purposes context. Language Teaching Journal, 231, 78–106.
Mohan, B., Slater, T., Beckett, G., & Tong, E. (2015). Task, experiential learning, and meaning making activities. In M. Bygate (Ed), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 157–192). John Benjamins.
Riestenberg, K., & Sherris, A. (2018). Task-based teaching of indigenous languages: Investment and methodological principles in Macuiltianguis Zapotec and Salish Qlispe revitalization. Canadian Modern Language Review, 741, 434–459.
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. (pp. 287–318). Cambridge University Press.
(2015). The Cognition Hypothesis, second language demands, and the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domain and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 87–121). John Benjamins.
Serafini, E. J., Lake, J. B., & Long, M. H. (2015). Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. English for Specific Purposes, 401, 11–26.
Serafini, E., & Torres, J. (2015). The utility of needs analysis for nondomain expert instructors in designing task-based Spanish for the professions curricula. Foreign Language Annals, 481, 447–472.
Shehadeh, A. (2012). Introduction: Broadening the perspective of task-based language teaching scholarship: The contribution of research in foreign language contexts. In A. Shehadeh & C. Coombe (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language context: Research and implementation (pp. 1–20). John Benjamins.
Shor, I. (1992). Empowering Education: Critical teaching for social change. University of Chicago Press.
(2001). Tasks and language performance assessment. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing, (pp. 167–185). Longman.
Skehan, P., & Luo, S. (2020). Developing a task-based approach to assessment in an Asian context. System, 901, 1–15.
Smith, M. K. (2000). Curriculum theory and practice. The encyclopedia of pedagogy and informal education. [URL]
Stenhouse, L. (1971). The humanities curriculum project: The rationale. Theory into Practice, 101, 154–162.
Van Ek, J. (1975). The threshold level in European Unit/Credit system for modern language learning by adults. System development in adult language learning. Council of Europe.
Stoller, F. L., & Grabe, W. (1997). A six-Ts approach to content-based instruction. In M. A. Snow & D. M. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content (pp. 78–103). Longman.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. The University of Chicago Press.
Cited by (17)
Cited by 17 other publications
Chunliu, Xie & Lan Guangsheng
da Silva, Leonardo, Priscila Fabiane Farias & Litiane Barbosa Macedo
O'Grady, Stefan
Pili-Moss, Diana, Phillip Hamrick, Katharina Wendebourg, Torben Schmidt & Detmar Meurers
Rodrigues do Ó, Wesley Nóbrega, Leonardo da Silva & Raquel Carolina Souza Ferraz D'Ely
Sato, Masatoshi, Gonzalo Salas, Lani Freeborn & Azar Tajabadi
Zhang, Dan
Gutiérrez, Xavier
İnci Kavak, Vildan
Yu, Lu
Bourgoin, Renée & Josée Le Bouthillier
2023. A task-based framework for oral language instruction in support of young language learners in French
immersion. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 3:1 ► pp. 74 ff.
Li, Hongyu & Nathan Thomas
2023. Chinese EFL teachers’ understandings and implementation of task-based language teaching. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 3:2 ► pp. 305 ff.
Siddiqui, Tamoha & Paula Winke
2023. Bangladeshi EAP teachers’ perspectives on task-based language
teaching. TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 3:2 ► pp. 273 ff.
Studer, Thomas
Van Gorp, Koen & Kris Van den Branden
Xu, Chunjing & Yaxiang Fan
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
