Cover not available

Article published In: Target
Vol. 31:1 (2019) ► pp.2–24

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Investigating interpreters’ empathy

Are emotions in simultaneous interpreting contagious?

ORCiD logo with link | Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
 | Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
Published online: 31 July 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.17123.kor
Abstract
An experimental study was conducted to examine whether simultaneous interpreters are affected by the speaker’s emotions. To this end, two measures of emotion were used: galvanic skin response (GSR) as a marker of emotional arousal, and SUPIN – the Polish adaptation of PANAS (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule). A group of interpreters with Polish as their A language and English as their B language (N = 20) took part in the experiment. They were asked to simultaneously interpret two speeches (recordings accompanied by video) from Polish into English: a neutral speech and an emotional speech. The results show that the interpreters are indeed affected by the speaker’s emotions, which is reflected in both a greater galvanic skin response and higher SUPIN scores for the emotional speech, when compared to the neutral speech and baseline values. The results may shed new light on the importance of emotion processing in simultaneous interpreting.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Aim
  • 3.Materials
  • 4.Participants
  • 5.Method
  • 6.Procedure
  • 7.Results
  • 8.Discussion
  • 9.Limitations of the study and further research
  • 10.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (72)
References
AIIC (International Association of Conference Interpreters). 2002. “Workload Study – Full Report.” [URL]
Barsade, Sigal G. 2002. “The Ripple Effect: Emotional Contagion and Its Influence on Group Behavior.” Administrative Science Quarterly 47 (4): 644–675. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bidoli, Cynthia. 2002. “Spoken-Language and Signed-Language Interpretation: Are They Really So Different?” In Interpreting in the 21st Century, edited by Giuliana Garzone and Maurizio Viezzi, 171–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bradley, Margaret M., Bruce N. Cuthbert, and Peter J. Lang. 1990. “Startle Reflex Modification: Emotion or Attention?” Psychophysiology 27 (5): 513–522. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braun, Sabine, and Judith L. Taylor, eds. 2012. Videoconference and Remote Interpreting in Criminal Proceedings. Antwerp: Intersentia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brisau, André, Rita Godijns, and Chris Meuleman. 1994. “Towards a Psycholinguistic Profile of the Interpreter.” Meta 39 (1): 87–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brzozowski, Piotr. 2010. Skala Uczuć Pozytywnych i Negatywnych (SUPIN). Polska adaptacja skali PANAS Davida Watsona i Lee Anny Clark. Podręcznik [SUPIN – Polish adaptation of PANAS – Positive and Negative Affect Schedule by David Watson and Lee Anna Clark. A manual]. Warsaw: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christoffels, Ingrid, and Annette de Groot. 2005. “Simultaneous Interpreting: A Cognitive Perspective.” In Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches, edited by Judith F. Kroll and Annette de Groot, 454–479. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, Edwin W., Larry H. Hawk, Tammy L. Davis, and Victor E. Stevenson. 1991. “Affective Individual Differences and Startle Reflex Modulation.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1001: 5–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crawford, John R., and Julie D. Henry. 2004. “The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct Validity, Measurement Properties and Normative Data in a Large Non-clinical Sample.” British Journal of Clinical Psychology 431: 245–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, Mark H. 1983. “Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 (1): 113–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davitti, Elena, Eloisa Monteoliva, Demi Krystallidou, and Sabine Braun. 2016. “Multimodal Analysis of a Multimodal Activity: Methodological Explorations of Interpreter-Mediated Interaction.” Paper presented at the Critical Link 8 Conference, Edinburgh, UK.
Doherty, R. William. 1998. “Emotional Contagion and Social Judgment.” Motivation and Emotion 22 (3): 187–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul, and Walter Friesen. 1978. The Facial Action Coding System (FACS): A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Action. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eysenck, Hans J., and Sybil B. G. Eysenck. 1975. Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ-R Adult). San Diego, CA: EdITS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerver, David. 1969. “The Effects of Source Language Presentation Rate on the Performance of Simultaneous Conference Interpreters.” In Proceedings of the 2nd Louisville Conference on Rate and/or Frequency Controlled Speech, edited by Emerson Foulke, 162–184. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldstein, Arnold P., and Gérald Y. Michaels. 1985. Empathy: Development, Training, and Consequences. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grant, David A., and Esta A. Berg. 1948. “A Behavioural Analysis of Degree of Reinforcement and Ease of Shifting to New Responses in a Weigl-Type Card Sorting Problem.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 381: 404–411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gross, James J., and Lisa Feldman Barrett. 2011. “Emotion Generation and Emotion Regulation: One or Two Depends on Your Point of View.” Emotion Review 3 (1): 8–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gruszczyński, Włodzimierz, and Maciej Ogrodniczuk. 2016. Jasnopis czyli mierzenie zrozumiałości polskich tekstów użytkowych [Jasnopis – measuring comprehensibility of Polish non-literary texts]. Warsaw: Oficyna Wydawnicza ASPRA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Sandra B. 2007. Community Interpreting. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatfield, Elaine, John T. Cacioppo, and Richard L. Rapson. 1994. Emotional Contagion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatfield, Elaine, Richard L. Rapson, and Yen-Chi L. Le. 2009. “Emotional Contagion and Empathy.” In The Social Neuroscience of Empathy, edited by Jean Decety and William Ickes, 19–30, Boston, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hermans, Hubert. 2004. Prestatie Motivatie Test [Achievement motivation test]. Lisse: Harcourt Test Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howard, Daniel J., and Charles Gengler. 2001. “Emotional Contagion Effect on Product Attitudes.” Journal of Consumer Research 28 (2): 189–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsee, Christopher K., Elaine Hatfield, and Claude Chemtob. 1992. “Assessments of Emotional States of Others: Conscious Judgments versus Emotional Contagion.” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 11 (2): 119–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kade, Otto. 1967. “Zu einigen Besonderheiten des Simultandolmetschens.” Fremdsprachen 11 (1): 8–17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1968. Zufall und Gesetzmäßigkeit in der Übersetzung. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kappas, Arvid, Ursula Hess, and Klaus R. Scherer. 1991. “Voice and Emotion.” In Fundamentals of Nonverbal Behavior: Studies in Emotion and Interaction, edited by Robert S. Feldman and Bernard Rime, 200–238. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klonowicz, Tatiana. 1994. “Putting One’s Heart into Simultaneous Interpretation.” In Bridging the Gap: Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation, edited by Sylvie Lambert and Barbara Moser-Mercer, 213–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopczyński, Andrzej. 1981. “Deviance in Conference Interpreting.” In The Mission of the Translator Today, edited by Andrzej Kopczyński, Anatol Hanftwurcel, Ewa Karska and Lew Riwin, 399–404. Warsaw: Polska Agencja Interpress.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korpal, Paweł. 2017. Linguistic and Psychological Indicators of Stress in Simultaneous Interpreting. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurz, Ingrid. 2002. “Physiological Stress Responses during Media and Conference Interpreting.” In Interpreting in the 21st Century, edited by Giuliana Garzone and Maurizio Viezzi, 195–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “Physiological Stress during Simultaneous Interpreting: A Comparison of Experts and Novices.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter 121: 51–67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambert, Sylvie. 2004. “Shared Attention during Sight Translation, Sight Interpretation and Simultaneous Interpretation.” Meta 49 (2): 294–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauss, Iris B., and Michael D. Robinson. 2009. “Measures of Emotion: A Review.” Cognition and Emotion 23 (2): 209–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Monfort, Samuel S., Łukasz D. Kaczmarek, Todd B. Kashdan, Dariusz Drążkowski, Michał Kosakowski, Przemysław Guzik, Tomasz Krauze, and Asmir Gracanin. 2014. “Capitalizing on the Success of Romantic Partners: A Laboratory Investigation on Subjective, Facial, and Physiological Emotional Processing.” Personality and Individual Differences 681: 149–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moser-Mercer, Barbara. 2005. “Remote Interpreting: The Crucial Role of Presence.” Bulletin VALS-ASLA (Swiss Association of Applied Linguistics) 811: 73–97.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moser-Mercer, Barbara, Alexander Künzli, and Marina Korac. 1998. “Prolonged Turns in Interpreting: Effects on Quality, Physiological and Psychological Stress (Pilot Study).” Interpreting 3 (1): 47–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers-Briggs, Isabel. 1962. Manual: The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Napier, Jemina, and Marcel Leneham. 2011. “‘It Was Difficult to Manage the Communication’: Testing the Feasibility of Video Remote Signed Language Interpreting in Court.” Journal of Interpretation 21 (1): 52–63.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neumann, Roland, and Fritz Strack. 2000. “Mood Contagion: The Automatic Transfer of Mood between Persons.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (2): 211–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Northouse, Peter G. 1979. “Interpersonal Trust and Empathy in Nurse-Nurse Relationships.” Nursing Research 28 (6): 365–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oléron, Pierre, and Hubert Nanpon. 1965. “Recherches sur la traduction simultanée.” Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique 62 (2): 73–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riegel, Monika, Małgorzata Wierzba, Marek Wypych, Łukasz Żurawski, Katarzyna Jednoróg, Anna Grabowska, and Artur Marchewka. 2015. “Nencki Affective Word List (NAWL): The Cultural Adaptation of the Berlin Affective Word List-Reloaded (BAWL-R) for Polish.” Behavior Research Methods 47 (4): 1222–1236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rojo, Ana, Marina Ramos Caro, and Javier Valenzuela. 2014. “The Emotional Impact of Translation: A Heart Rate Study.” Journal of Pragmatics 711: 31–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roziner, Ilan, and Miriam Shlesinger. 2010. “Much Ado about Something Remote: Stress and Performance in Remote Interpreting.” Interpreting 12 (2): 214–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schachter, Stanley, and Jerome E. Singer. 1962. “Cognitive, Social and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State.” Psychological Review 69 (5): 379–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schweda Nicholson, Nancy. 2005. “Personality Characteristics of Interpreter Trainees: The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI).” The Interpreters’ Newsletter 131: 109–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seeber, Kilian. 2012. “Multimodal Input in Simultaneous Interpreting: An Eye-Tracking Experiment.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference TRANSLATA, Translation and Interpreting Research: Yesterday – Today – Tomorrow, edited by Lew Zybatov, Alena Petrova and Michael Ustaszewski, 341–347. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Multimodal Processing in Simultaneous Interpreting.” In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, edited by John W. Schwieter and Aline Ferreira, 461–475. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Surakka, Veikko, and Jari K. Hietanen. 1998. “Facial and Emotional Reactions to Duchenne and non-Duchenne Smiles.” International Journal of Psychophysiology 291: 23–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Timarová, Šarka, and Harry Ungoed-Thomas. 2008. “Admission Testing for Interpreting Courses.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 2 (1): 29–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vermunt, Jan, and Frank van Rijswijk. 1987. Inventaris Leerstijlen [Inventory of learning styles]. Tilburg: K.U. Brabant/Open Universiteit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vranjes, Jelena, Hanneke Bot, Kurt Feyaerts, and Geert Brône. 2015. “Multimodal Feedback Mechanisms in Interpreter-Mediated Interaction.” Paper presented at the 14th International Pragmatics Conference (Antwerp).
Vranjes, Jelena, Annelies Jehoul, Kurt Feyaerts, and Geert Brône. 2016. “Dual Feedback in Triadic Interactions: On the Interplay between Gesture and Gaze.” Paper presented at the ISGS Conference 2016: Gesture, Creativity, Multimodality (Paris).
Wadensjö, Cecilia. 1998. Interpreting as Interaction. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watson, David, Lee Anna Clark, and Auke Tellegen. 1988. “Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (6): 1063–1070. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waugh, Christian E., Renee J. Thompson, and Ian H. Gotlib. 2011. “Flexible Emotional Responsiveness in Trait Resilience.” Emotion 11 (5): 1059–1067. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wróbel, Monika. 2008. “O transferze emocji i nastrojów między ludźmi – mechanizm i psychologiczne wyznaczniki zarażenia afektywnego” [On the transfer of emotions and moods between people – the mechanism and psychological determinants of affective contagion]. Psychologia Społeczna 33 (8): 210–230.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Zarażenie afektywne: O procesie transferu emocji i nastroju między ludźmi [Affective contagion: On the transfer of emotions and moods between people]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zagar Galvão, Elena. 2009. “Speech and Gesture in the Booth – a Descriptive Approach to Multimodality in Simultaneous Interpreting.” In Translation and the (Trans)formation of Identities. Selected Papers of the CETRA Research Seminar in Translation Studies 2008, edited by Dries De Crom, 1–26. Leuven: CETRA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhou, Qing, Carlos Valiente, and Nancy Eisenberg. 2003. “Empathy and Its Measurement.” In Positive Psychological Assessment: A Handbook of Models and Measures, edited by Shane J. Lopez and C. Richard Snyder, 269–284. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (25)

Cited by 25 other publications

Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena, Sonja Pöllabauer & Viktoria Straczek-Helios
2025. Activist interpreting in abortion clinics. Translation and Interpreting Studies 20:1 ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Jalalian Daghigh, Ali, Yuezeng Niu & Pei Soo Ang
2025. A multimethod inquiry into translators’ emotions in dealing with socio-politically sensitive news texts. Perspectives 33:4 ► pp. 858 ff. DOI logo
Korpal, Paweł, Katarzyna Jankowiak & Łukasz D. Kaczmarek
2025. Emotional content affects interpreters. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting DOI logo
Li, Heng
2025. Interpret your languages, understand your feelings: The relationship between interpreting experience and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences 233 ► pp. 112927 ff. DOI logo
Martín, Ricardo Muñoz & Ana María Rojo López
2025. Introduction. In Research Methods in Cognitive Translation and Interpreting Studies [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 10], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Rojo López, Ana María, Marina Ramos Caro, Daria Patalas & Aleksandra Jasielska
2025. Psychophysiological methods. In Research Methods in Cognitive Translation and Interpreting Studies [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 10], ► pp. 256 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Yifan & Chen-En Ho
2025. Shedding light on stress in interpreting studies. Translation, Cognition & Behavior DOI logo
Zhang, Wenkang, Yao Yao, Rui Xie & Dechao Li
2025. Can artificial intelligence mirror the human’s emotions? A comparative sentiment analysis of human and machine interpreting in press conferences. Behaviour & Information Technology ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hung, Alvin Hoi-Chun
2024. The Role of Boundary-Spanners in the Control of a Chinese Garment Factory in Myanmar. Work, Employment and Society 38:5 ► pp. 1333 ff. DOI logo
Mellinger, Christopher D. & Thomas A. Hanson
2024. Psychometric properties of survey translations. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 7:1 ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Cásedas, Luis, María J. Funes, Marc Ouellet & Mercedes García de Quesada
2023. Training transversal competences in a bachelor’s degree in translation and interpreting: preliminary evidence from a clinical trial. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 17:2 ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Kanojia, Diptesh & Aditya Joshi
2023. Applications and challenges of SA in real-life scenarios. In Computational Intelligence Applications for Text and Sentiment Data Analysis, ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Kara, Hanna & Camilla Nordberg
2023. Configuring public service interpreting in Finland as a sentient professional practice and affirmative social service work: emotion in the work of public service interpreters. Nordic Social Work Research 13:4 ► pp. 563 ff. DOI logo
Kumcu, Alper
2023. Emotional Language Processing in Bilingualism: Subjective Affect and Prosodic Markers in Simultaneous Interpreting. Cankaya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 17:2 ► pp. 194 ff. DOI logo
Stanisławska, Agata & Paweł Korpal
2023. The emotional value of Polish and English subtitles. Translation Spaces 12:2 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Su, Wei
2023. Investigating student interpreters’ emotional component of aptitude: a mixed method approach. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 17:1 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Li, Saihong, Yifang Wang & Yubo Zhou Rasmussen
2022. Studying interpreters’ stress in crisis communication: evidence from multimodal technology of eye-tracking, heart rate and galvanic skin response. The Translator 28:4 ► pp. 468 ff. DOI logo
Sharma, Tanya, Manoj Diwakar & Chandrakala Arya
2022. INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE “TECHNOLOGY IN AGRICULTURE, ENERGY AND ECOLOGY” (TAEE2022) [INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE “TECHNOLOGY IN AGRICULTURE, ENERGY AND ECOLOGY” (TAEE2022), 2767], ► pp. 020045 ff. DOI logo
Weng, Yu, Binghan Zheng & Yanping Dong
2022. Time pressure in translation. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 34:4 ► pp. 601 ff. DOI logo
Zhu, Xuelian & Vahid Aryadoust
2022. A Synthetic Review of Cognitive Load in Distance Interpreting: Toward an Explanatory Model. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Apfelthaler, Matthias
2021. Empathy. In Handbook of Translation Studies [Handbook of Translation Studies, 5], ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Gieshoff, Anne Catherine, Caroline Lehr & Andrea Hunziker Heeb
2021. Stress, cognitive, emotional and ergonomic demands in interpreting and translation. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8:2 ► pp. 404 ff. DOI logo
Muñoz Martín, Ricardo
2021. Situated cognition. In Handbook of Translation Studies [Handbook of Translation Studies, 5], ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Walker, Callum
2021. Investigating how we read translations. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8:2 ► pp. 482 ff. DOI logo
Giustini, Deborah
2019. “It’s not just words, it’s the feeling, the passion, the emotions”: an ethnography of affect in interpreters’ practices in contemporary Japan. Asian Anthropology 18:3 ► pp. 186 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue