Bilingual formal meeting as a context of translatoriality
Published online: 20 September 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.16017.kos
https://doi.org/10.1075/target.16017.kos
Abstract
Drawing on the concept of translatorial action by Justa Holz-Mänttäri, this article sets out to analyse the role of translation in a bilingual formal meeting without any professional translation or interpreting. The analysis reveals the central role of translatorial activities: 60% of the turns include some kind of translatoriality. The chair and expert speakers stand out as producers for most of the translations. Self-translation is the most prominent form of translation, but otherwise the translator role tends to vary dynamically with the role of the source text producer. Three types of translatorial action with varying degrees of replication of content were found: duplicating, summarizing, and expanding. In the meeting context, translatorial action is the primary means of enabling participation for all, regardless of language skills or language background, and this action was used by the participants in flexible and dynamic ways.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Aim, data and method
- 3.Translatorial action and translatoriality
- 4.Language practices in bilingual formal meetings
- 4.1The degree of translatoriality
- 4.2Actors taking up translatorial roles
- 4.3Types of translatorial action
- 4.3.1Duplicating
- 4.3.2Summarizing
- 4.3.3Expanding
- 4.4Participants’ testimonies
- 5.Conclusions and suggestions for future work
- Notes
References
References (21)
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca, and Susan Harris. 1997. Managing Language. The Discourse of Corporate Meetings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Elderkin-Thompson, Virginia, Roxane Cohen Silver, and Howard Waitzkin. 2001. “When Nurses Double as Interpreters: A Study of Spanish-Speaking Patients in a US Primary Care Setting.” Social Science & Medicine 52 (9): 1343–1358.
Hokenson Walsh, Jan, and Marcella Munson. 2007. The Bilingual Text: History and Theory of Literary Self-translation. London: Routledge.
Holz-Mänttäri, Justa. 1982. Vom Translatorischen Handeln. Unpublished material. Symposium “Die Leistung des Translators als ungenutzte Ressource des Unternehmens. Grundlagen und Arbeitsmethoden des Berufstranslators” (Turku, June 3–4, 1982).
. 1984. Translatorisches Handeln. Theorie und Methode. Annales Academiae Scientarum Fennicae. Ser. B 226. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
Kang, Ji-Hae. 2014. “Institutions Translated: Discourse, Identity and Power in Institutional Mediation.” Perspectives 22 (4): 469–478.
Koskela, Merja, and Nina Pilke. 2016. “From Slow Repetition to Awkward Omission: Economic, Efficient, and Precise Language Use in Bilingual Formal Meetings.” Multilingua 35 (3): 251–275.
Koskinen, Kaisa. 2011. “Institutional Translation.” In Handbook of Translation Studies. Volume 21, ed. by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 54–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Koskinen, Kaisa, and Tuija Kinnunen. 2010. “Introduction.” In Translators’ Agency, ed. by Tuija Kinnunen and Kaisa Koskinen, 4–9. Tampere Studies in Language, Translation and Culture, B4. [URL]
Pérez-González, Luis. 2012. “Amateur Subtitling and the Pragmatics of Spectatorial Subjectivity.” Language & Intercultural Communication 12 (4): 335–353.
Pilke, Nina, Leena Kolehmainen, and Esa Penttilä. 2015. “Luonnollinen kääntäminen, kielenvälitys, ad hoc – tulkkaus? Terminologinen näkökulma käännöstieteen reuna-alueille [Natural translation, language brokering, ad hoc interpreting? A terminological point of view on the periphery of translation studies].” Virittäjä 31: 318–341.
Pilke, Nina, and Sanna Salminen. 2013. Kielelliset käytänteet Pohjanmaan maakunnan yhteistyöryhmän (MYR) kaksikielisissä kokouksissa. Tilannesidonnainen samanaikaisuus ja kielivalinnan vaihtoehtoisuus viestinnän ja vuorovaikutuksen näkökulmasta [Linguistic practices in bilingual meetings of the regional co-operation group of Ostrobothnia (MYR). Situated concurrence and the optional nature of language choice from the perspective of communication and interaction]. Vaasan yliopiston julkaisuja. Selvityksiä ja raportteja 183. Vaasa: Vaasan yliopisto.
Ostrobothnia in Numbers 2014. Accessed November 22, 2015. [URL]
Reh, Mechthild. 2004. “Multilingual Writing: A Reader-Oriented Typology – with Examples from Lira Municipality (Uganda).” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1701: 1–41.
Schäffner, Christina. 2011. “Theory of Translatorial Action.” In Handbook of Translation Studies. Volume 21, ed. by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 157–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Schwartzman, Helen B.. 1989. The Meeting: Gatherings in Organizations and Communities. New York: Plenum.
Secară, Alina. 2011. “R U ready 4 new subtitles? Investigating the Potential of Social Translation Practices and Creative Spellings.” Linguistica Antverpiensia. New Series 101: 153–171.
Snell-Hornby, Mary. 2006. The Turns of Translation Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Koskinen, Kaisa
2025. Translating at work. In Field Research on Translation and Interpreting [Benjamins Translation Library, 165], ► pp. 36 ff.
Steinkogler, Vanessa
2025. Practisearcher meets ‘non-professionals’. In Field Research on Translation and Interpreting [Benjamins Translation Library, 165], ► pp. 137 ff.
Hirvonen, Maija & Betta Saari
Nissi, Riikka, Mona Blåsjö & Carla Jonsson
Sobesto, Joanna
Havumetsä, Nina
Havumetsä, Nina
Piekkari, Rebecca, Susanne Tietze & Kaisa Koskinen
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
