Why Common Ground Is Not Automatically Space for Cooperation: On Chesterman versus Arrojo

Pym, Anthony

doi:10.1075/target.12.2.13pym

Discussion published In: Target
Vol. 12:2 (2000) ► pp.334–337

Discussion

Why Common Ground Is Not Automatically Space for Cooperation

On Chesterman versus Arrojo

Anthony Pym | Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona

Published online: 4 May 2001

https://doi.org/10.1075/target.12.2.13pym

Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Order by:

Lee, Hyang Marina

2015. Mapping Translation Studies in Korea Using the Holmes Map of Translation Studies. FORUM. Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation 13:1 ► pp. 65 ff.

Dohun Kim

2011. Ellipsis (. . .) and Julimpyo (……): Comparison and Strategies to Translate Ellipsis in English-Korean Translation. English21 24:1 ► pp. 113 ff.

Dohun Kim

2014. Comparison between Korean-English Onomatopoeia and Translation of Korean Onomatopoeia into English. The Journal of Translation Studies 15:1 ► pp. 25 ff.

Arrojo, Rosemary

2002. Lessons learned from Babel. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 14:1 ► pp. 137 ff.

Neubert, Albrecht

2001. Shared ground in Translation Studies: A third series of responses. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 13:2 ► pp. 333 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.