Cover not available

In:It's different with you: Contrastive perspectives on address research
Edited by Nicole Baumgarten and Roel Vismans
[Topics in Address Research 5] 2023
► pp. 340–372

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 14
Investigating address in regional varieties of Italian

Contrasting methodologies

 | La Trobe University
Published online: 6 September 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/tar.5.14bre
Abstract
In the context of great linguistic diversity characterising Italy, the case of singular V pronouns is a prime example of regional variation. Surprisingly, an updated and geographically comprehensive account – after Rohlfs’s study (1968) – is missing. This chapter contrasts the methodologies employed in two relevant studies, namely the LinCi project (Nesi & Poggi Salani 2013), and Bresin (2021). Common methodological issues are: comparability of data from the various research sites, authenticity of data, and generalisability of findings (connected to representativeness of samples). However, geographical comprehensiveness emerges as the most compelling methodological challenge in the Italian context. This chapter outlines the basic characteristics of an ideal methodology that would produce a geographically comprehensive account of address in Italian.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodological background
    • 2.1Comparability of data
    • 2.2Authenticity and other validity considerations
    • 2.3Generalisability
  • 3.Linguistic background
    • 3.1Why regional variation in Italian
    • 3.2Local languages and regional varieties of Italian
    • 3.3Singular address pronouns in Italian and in local languages
    • 3.4Gap in the literature
  • 4.The LinCi project
  • 5.Bresin (2021)
  • 6.Discussion: Contrasting methodologies
    • 6.1Comparability in LinCi and Bresin (2021)
    • 6.2Authenticity, depth, and generalisability in LinCi and Bresin (2021)
    • 6.3Geographical comprehensiveness in LinCi and Bresin (2021)
    • 6.4An ideal methodology
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (89)
References
D’Achille, Paolo. 2002. L’italiano regionale. In Manlio Cortelazzo (ed.), I dialetti italiani: storia, struttura, uso, 26–42. Turin: UTET.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Angouri, Jo. 2010. Quantitative, qualitative or both? Combining methods in linguistic research. In Lia Litosseliti (ed.), Research methods in linguistics, 29–45. London/New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ashdowne, Richard. 2016. Address systems. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 897–906. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth & Laura Benigni. 1975. Rules of address in Italy: A sociological survey. Language in Society 4(3). 271–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bataller, Rebeca. 2019. Corner-store interactions in Cartagena and Bucaramanga: A variational pragmatics study. In J. César Félix-Brasdefer & María Elena Placencia (eds.), Pragmatic variation in service encounter interactions across the Spanish-speaking world, 35–54. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beebe, Leslie M. & Martha Clark Cummings. 1995. Natural speech act data versus written questionnaire data: How data collection method affects speech act performance. In Susan M. Gass & Joyce Neu (eds.), Speech acts across cultures: Challenges to communication in a second language, 65–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano. 2012. Sociolinguistica dell’italiano contemporaneo. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Blasi, Nicola. 2014. Geografia e storia dell’italiano regionale. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boberg, Charles. 2018. Surveys. The use of written questionnaires in sociolinguistics. In Christine Mallinson, Becky Childs & Gerard Van Herk (eds.), Data Collection in Sociolinguistics: Methods and Applications, Second Edition, 134–143. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019a. Perceptions of address practices in Italian interregional encounters. A case study of restaurant encounters. The Journal of Pragmatics 143. 185–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019b. Nord e Sud, ma anche Centro. Trend contrastanti nella percezione delle pratiche allocutive in Italia. In Paolo Orrù (ed.), Il dualismo Nord-Sud: vecchie e nuove questioni in Italia e nel Mediterraneo, 151–169. Florence: Cesati.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 253–276. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brunet, Jacqueline. 1987. Grammaire critique de l'italien (Vol. 9). Paris: Presses universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruni, Francesco. 1996. Introduzione. In Francesco Bruni (ed.), L’italiano nelle regioni. Storia della lingua italiana (Vol. 1), XXV–LXXIII. Milan: Garzanti.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna, & Nicola Munaro (eds.). 2008. Italiano, italiani regionali e dialetti. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cerruti, Massimo. 2011a. Regional varieties of Italian in the linguistic repertoire. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 210. 9–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. Italiano e dialetto oggi in Italia. In Enciclopedia Treccani. [URL] (10 May 2020)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack K. 1998. Inferring dialect from a postal questionnaire. Journal of English Linguistics 26. 222–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael, Catrin Norrby & Jane Warren. 2009. Language and human relations: Styles of address in contemporary language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CLIPS (Corpora e Lessici di Italiano Parlato e Scritto, ‘Corpora and Lexicons of Spoken and Written Italian’). Available at [URL]
Copland, Fiona. 2018. Observation and Fieldnotes. In Aek Phakiti, Peter De Costa, Luke Plonsky & Sue Starfield (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology, 249–268. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel & Michael Lettieri. 1983. The pronouns of address in Italian: Sociolinguistic and pedagogical considerations. Studi italiani di linguistica teorica ed applicata 12. 323–333.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dardano, Maurizio. 2005. Nuovo manualetto di linguistica italiana. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Pascale, Stefano, Stefania Marzo & Dirk Speelman. 2017. Evaluating regional variation in Italian: Towards a change in standard language ideology? In Massimo Cerruti, Claudia Crocco & Stefania Marzo (eds.), Towards a new standard, 118–141. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2018. Online questionnaires. In Aek Phakiti, Peter De Costa, Luke Plonsky & Sue Starfield (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology, 269–286. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dollinger, Stefan. 2012. The written questionnaire as a sociolinguistic data gathering tool: testing its validity. Journal of English Linguistics 40(1). 74–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Zoltán. 2007. Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Zoltán & Tatsuya Taguchi. 2009. Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Abingdon, Oxon/New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edley, Nigel & Lia Litosseliti. (2010). Contemplating interviews and focus groups. In Lia Litosseliti (ed.), Research methods in linguistics, 155–179). London/New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farese, Gian Marco. 2018. The cultural semantics of address practices. A contrastive study between English and Italian. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César & Allison B. Yates. 2019. Regional pragmatic variation in small shops in Mexico City, Buenos Aires, and Seville, Spain. In J. César Félix-Brasdefer & María Elena Placencia (eds.), Pragmatic variation in service encounter interactions across the Spanish-speaking world, 15–34. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Formentelli, Maicol & John Hajek. 2015. Address in Italian academic interactions: The power of distance and (non)-reciprocity. In Catrin Norrby & Camilla Wide (eds.), Address practice as social action: European perspectives, 119–140. Basingstoke/London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Francesco, Antonino. 2012. La palla al piede. Una storia del pregiudizio antimeridionale. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geluykens, Ronald. 2019. Pragmatic variation in service encounter complaints: Some methodological issues. In J. César Félix-Brasdefer & María Elena Placencia (eds.), Pragmatic variation in service encounter interactions across the Spanish-speaking world, 265–277. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golato, Andrea. 2003. Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics 24(1): 90–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hajek, John, Heinz L. Kretzenbacher & Robert Lagerberg. 2013. Towards a linguistic typology of address pronouns in Europe – past and present. In John Henderson, Marie-Eve Ritz & Celeste Rodríguez Louro (eds.), 2012 conference of the Australian Linguistic Society (Perth, 5–7 December 2012)., 1–15. [URL] (10 September 2020).
Holstein, James A. & Jaber F. Gubrium. 2004. The active interview. In David Silverman (ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method, and practice, 140–161. London: SAGE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith. (2008). Quantitative methods in linguistics. Malden, MA/Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Larssyn Staley. 2017. (Im)politeness and developments in methodology. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (Im)politeness, 403–429. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele. 2000. Data collection in pragmatics research. In Helen Spence-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking: managing rapport through talk across cultures, 316–341. New York: Cassel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele & Merete Dahl. 1991. Research Methods in Interlanguage Pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13(2). 215–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2015. Varieties in Italy 1. In Konstanze Jungbluth & Federica Da Milano (eds.), Manual of deixis in Romance languages, 75–113. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 2014. The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lepschy, Anna Laura & Giulio Lepschy. 1998. The Italian language today. New York: New Amsterdam Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Laurel. 2018. Dialect Surveys and Student-Led Data Collection. In Christine Mallinson, Becky Childs & Gerard Van Herk (eds.), Data Collection in Sociolinguistics: Methods and Applications, Second Edition, 151–153. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin & Mair Parry (eds.). 1997. The dialects of Italy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin & Cecilia Robustelli. 2000. A reference grammar of modern Italian. Chicago: NTC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marazzini, Claudio. 1994. La lingua italiana: profilo storico. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio. 1986. Storia linguistica dell’Italia unita. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Storia linguistica dell’Italia repubblicana: dal 1946 ai nostri giorni. Rome/Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merlo, Clemente. 1925. L’Italia dialettale. L’Italia dialettale 1. 12–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molinelli, Piera. 2010. Allocutivi, pronomi. In Treccani l’enciclopedia italiana. [URL] (10 September 2020).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Polite forms and sociolinguistic dynamics in contacts between varieties of Italian. Contatto interlinguistico fra presente e passato. 14. 283–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Sociocultural and linguistic constraints in address choice from Latin to Italian. In Kate Beeching, Chiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli (eds.), Positioning the self and others. Linguistic perspectives, 51–79. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Forme di cortesia nella storia dell’italiano: cambiamenti nella lingua e nei rapporti sociali. In: Ulla Åkerström (ed.), L’italiano e la ricerca. Temi linguistici e letterari nel terzo millennio. Atti del Convegno internazionale, Università di Göteborg, 15–16 giugno 2017, 53–71. Rome: Aracne.
Musumeci, Diane. 1991. Ciao, professoressa! A study of forms of address in Italian and its implications for the language classroom. Italica. 68(4). 434–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesi, Annalisa & Teresa Poggi Salani. 2013. La lingua delle città. LinCi. La banca dati. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niculescu, Alexandru. 1974. Strutture allocutive, pronominali, reverenziali in italiano. Florence: LS Olschki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orioles, Vincenzo. 1983. Aspetti dell’interazione friulano-italiano. Identità 4(2). 107–115.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orlando, Anna Maria. 2015. Permettete una parola, Signora? Il voi allocutivo nell’italiano regionale di Calabria tra rispetto e identità. L’Italia dialettale. Rivista di dialettologia italiana 76. 149–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkinson, Amber & John Hajek. 2004. Keeping it all in the family: tu, lei and voi A study of address pronoun use in Italian. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 18. 97–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pellegrini, Giovan Battista. 1977. Carta dei dialetti d’Italia. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petraccone, Claudia. 2000. Le due civiltà. Settentrionali e meridionali nella storia d’Italia dal 1860 al 1914. Rome/Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Placencia, María Elena. 2011. Regional pragmatic variation. In Gisle Andersen & Karin Aijmer (eds.), Pragmatics of society, 79–113. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prior, Matthew T. 2018. Interviews and Focus Groups. In Aek Phakiti, Peter De Costa, Luke Plonsky & Sue Starfield (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology, 225–248. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rasinger, Sebastian M. 2010. Quantitative methods: Concepts, frameworks and issues. In Lia Litosseliti (ed.), Research methods in linguistics, 49–67. London/New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renzi, Lorenzo. 1993. La deissi personale e il suo uso sociale. Studi di grammatica italiana. 15. 347–390.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. “Ma la diga, no xela venezian èla?”. Per una storia delle forme allocutive nei dialetti italiani. In Paola Benincà, Guglielmo Cinque, Tullia De Mauro & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Italiano e dialetti nel tempo. Saggi di grammatica per Giulio C. Lepschy, 259–271. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1968. Grammatica storica dell’italiano e dei suoi dialetti. Vol. 2: Morfologia. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sabatini, Francesco & Vittorio Coletti (eds.). 2013. Il Sabatini Coletti: dizionario essenziale della lingua italiana. [URL] (10 May 2020).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.). 2001. The Handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P. 2018. Methods and ethics of data collection. In Andreas H. Jucker, Klaus P. Schneider & Wolfram Bublitz (eds.). Methods in pragmatics, 37–93. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P. & Barron, Anne. 2008. Where pragmatics and dialectology meet: Introducing variational pragmatics. In Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds.), Variational pragmatics: A focus on regional varieties in pluricentric languages, 1–32. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serianni, Luca. & Alberto Castelvecchi. 2006. Grammatica italiana: italiano comune e lingua letteraria. Turin: UTET.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack & Tanya Stivers (eds.). 2013. The Handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester, U.K./Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sobrero, Alberto 1992. Indicazioni stradali: modello urbano e modello rurale. In Alberto Sobrero (ed.), Il dialetto nella conversazione. Ricerche di dialettologia pragmatica, 161–172. Galatina: Congedo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. L’italiano nelle regioni. In Mariuccia Salvati & Loredana Sciolla (eds.), L’Italia e le sue regioni. L’età repubblicana. Vol 3:. Culture, 547–567. Rome: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia italiana.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suomela-Härmä, Elina. 2013. Analisi dei questionari italiani. In Elina Suomela-Härmä, Juhani Härmä & Eva Havu (eds.), Representations des formes d’adresse dans les langues romanes, 151–171. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Steven. 2010. Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30, (128–148). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Telmon, Tullio. 1990. Guida allo studio degli italiani regionali. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Telve, Stefano. 2011. Allocutivi [Prontuario]. In Treccani l’enciclopedia italiana. [URL] (10 May 2022).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tempesta, Immacolata. 1995. Tecniche di rilevamento e procedure d’analisi. Il caso della deissi sociale. In Maria Teresa Romanello & Immacolata Tempesta (eds.), Dialetti e lingue nazionali: atti del XXVII Congresso della Società di linguistica italiana, Lecce, 28–30 ottobre 1993, 432–453. Rome: Bulzoni.
Timm, Christian. 2001. Das dreigliedrige Allokutionssystem des Italienischen in Neapel. Frankfurt/M: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tosi, Arturo. 2001. Language and society in a changing Italy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trifone, Pietro. 2010. Storia linguistica dell’Italia disunita. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tropea, Giovanni. 1985. I pronomi allocutivi in area catanese. Lingua e storia in Puglia 27. 57–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vignuzzi, Ugo. 1997. Lazio, Umbria and the Marche. In Martin Maiden & Mair Parry (eds.), The dialects of Italy, 311–320. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue