Cover not available

In:Learning to Read in a Digital World
Edited by Mirit Barzillai, Jenny Thomson, Sascha Schroeder and Paul van den Broek
[Studies in Written Language and Literacy 17] 2018
► pp. 31–56

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 2
Designing digital texts for beginner readers

Performance, practice and process

 | University of Reading
 | University of Reading
 | Hasselt University
 | Hasselt University
 | Hasselt University
 | Text Matters
Published online: 9 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.17.02wal
Abstract
This chapter summarises issues that designers consider when they are producing reading materials for beginning and emerging readers, including the constraints imposed by technology. We suggest ways of engaging with users of e-books so that their needs can be considered. We conclude by summarising the typographic parameters that are likely to benefit children’s reading.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Considerations that affect designers’ decisions
  • 3.Typefaces, typography and the use of space
    • 3.1Typefaces
    • 3.2Type size, vertical and horizontal space
  • 4.Pictures and text
  • 5.E-reading formats and the control offered to the designer
    • 5.1Markup-based e-books: Flowed page layout
    • 5.2Pictures of pages: Fixed page-layout
  • 6.Finding out what works with beginner and emerging readers
  • 7.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
References (101)
References
Bateman, J. (2014). Text and image: A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beier, S. (2012). Reading letters: Designing for legibility. Amsterdam: BIS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beier, S., & Dyson, M. C. (2014). The influence of serifs on ‘h’ and ‘I’: Useful knowledge from design-led scientific research. Visible Language, 47(3), 74–95.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beier, S., & Larsen, K. (2010). Design improvements for frequently misrecognised letters. Information Design Journal, 18(2), 118–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernard, M. (2000). Examining user expectations of the location of web objects. Internetworking, 3(3).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Developing schemas for the location of common web objects. Usability News, 3(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bessemans, A. (2012). Letterontwerp voor kinderen met een visuele functiebeperking. (Unpublished PhD thesis). Leiden University & Hasselt University, Netherlands & Belgium.
(2016). Matilda, a typeface for children with low vision. In M. Dyson & C. Y. Suen (Eds.), Digital fonts and reading (pp. 19–36). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
BAAS (British Association for the Advancement of Science). (1913). Report on the influence of schoolbooks upon eyesight. London: John Murray.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black, A., Luna, P., Lund, O., & Walker, S. (Eds.). (2017). Information design: Research and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bringhurst, R. (1992). The elements of typographic style. Point Roberts, WA: Hartley & Marks.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruckman, A., Bandlow, A., Dimond, J., & Forte, A. (2012). Human-computer interaction for kids. In J. Jacko (Ed.), The human computer interaction handbook (pp. 841–862). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dillon, A. (2004). Designing usable electronic text (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Applying science to design: The quest for bridging representation. In A. Black, O. Lund, P. Luna, & S. Walker (Eds.), Information design research and practice (pp. 291–299). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Druin, A. (2002). The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Interaction Technology, 21(1), 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duschastel, P. (1978). Illustrating instructional texts. Educational Technology, 18(11), 36–39.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dyson, M. C. (2005a). How do we read text on screen? In H. van Oostendorp, L. Breure, & A. Dillon (Eds.), Creation, use, and deployment of digital information (pp. 279–306). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005b). Producing legible text on screen: Where do we look for guidance? Typo, 13, 30–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Where theory meets practice: A critical comparison of research into identifying letters and craft knowledge of type design. Design Journal, 16(3), 271–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Information design research methods. In A. Black, O. Lund, P. Luna, & S. Walker (Eds.), Information design research and practice (pp. 435–449). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dyson, M. C., & Suen, C. Y. (2016). Digital fonts and reading. Singapore: World Scientific. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emery, D. (1993). Developing effective instructional graphics. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 6(2), 20–124.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filippatou, D., & Pumfrey, P. (1996). Pictures, titles, reading accuracy and reading comprehension: A research review (1972–95). Educational Research, 38(3), 147–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiset, D., Blais, C., Ethier-Majcher, C., Arguin, M., Bub, D., & Gosselin, F. (2008). Features for identification of uppercase and lowercase letters. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1160–1167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gambrell, L. B. (2011). Seven rules of engagement: What’s most important to know about motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 65(3), 172–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldfarb, C. F., & Rubinsky, Y. (1990). The SGML handbook. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldsmith, E. (1984). Research into illustration. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gunn, J. (1906). The infant school: Its principles and methods. London: Nelson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haber, R. N., & Haber, L. R. (1981). Visual components of the reading process. Visible Language, 15(2), 147–182.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartley, J. (1987). Designing electronic text: The role of print-based research. Educational Communication and Technology, 35(1), 3–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartley, J., & Burnhill, P. (1971). Experiments with unjustified text. Visible Language, 5, 265–278.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartley, J., & Trueman, M. (1985). A research strategy for designers: The role of headings. Instructional Science, 14(2), 99–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartley, J., Burnhill, P., & Davis, L. (1978). The effects of line length and paragraph denotation on the retrieval of information from prose text. Visible Language, 12(2), 183–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hochuli, J. (2008). Detail in typography: Letters, letterspacing, words, wordspacing, lines, linespacing, columns (2nd ed.). London: Hyphen Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horton, W. (1990). Visual rhetoric for online documents. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 33(3), 108–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huey, E. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading with a review of the history of reading and writing and of methods, texts and hygiene in reading. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hughes, L., & Wilkins, A. (2000). Typography in children’s reading schemes may be suboptimal: Evidence from measures of reading rate. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(3), 314–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Reading at a distance: Implications for the design of big books. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 213–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
IDPF. 2010. Open Publication Structure (OPS) 2.0.1 v1.0.1. International Digital Publishing Forum. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. 3.1. International Digital Publishing Forum. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2003). How well suited are electronic books to supporting literacy? Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3(2), 147–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerr, J. (1904). Eyesight in school life. In A. Newsholme, & W. C. Pakes (Eds.), School hygiene: The laws of health in relation to school life. London: Swann Sonnenschein & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kolers, P. (1969). Clues to a letter’s recognition: Implications for the design of characters. Journal of Typographic Research, 3(2), 145–168.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kostelnick, C., & Hassett, M. (2003). Shaping information: The rhetoric of visual conventions. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(20), 179–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kucirkova, N., Littleton, K., & Cremin, T. (2015). Young children’s reading for pleasure with digital books: Six key facets of engagement. Cambridge Journal of Education, 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larson, K. (2004). The science of word recognition or how I learned to stop worrying and love the bouma. Advanced Reading Technology, Microsoft Corporation. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Legge, G. E., & Bigelow, C. A. (2011). Does print size matter for reading? A review of findings from vision science and typography. Journal of Vision, 11(5), 8, 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levie, W. H., & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 26(1), 195–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lund, O. (1999). Knowledge construction in typography: The case of legibility research and the legibility of sans serif typefaces. (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Reading, England, UK.
Mangen, A., (2017). Textual reading on paper and screens: Implications for design. In A. Black, P. Luna, O. Lund, & S. Walker (Eds.), Information design research and practice (pp. 275–290). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moys, J-L. (2017). Visual rhetoric in information design. In A. Black, P. Luna, O. Lund, & S. Walker (Eds.), Information design research and practice (pp. 204–220). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. (2010). Children’s websites: Usability issues in designing for kids. Retrieved from [URL]
Peeck J. (1987). The role of illustration in processing and remembering illustrated text. In D. M. Willows, & H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration. Vol. 1 basic research (pp. 115–151). New York: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pelli, D. G., & Tillman, K. A. (2007). Parts, wholes, and context in reading: A triple dissociation. PLoS ONE, 2(8), e680. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farrel B., & Moore-Page, D. C. (2006). Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research, 46(28), 4646–4674. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pelli, D. G., Farrell, B., & Moore, D. C. (2003). The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition. Nature, 423, 752–756. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Philips, R., & diGiorgio, A. (1997). Design. In R. Phillips (Ed.), Developer’s handbook to interactive multimedia: A practical guide for multimedia applications (pp. 59–194). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pyke, R. L. (1926). Report on the legibility of print. Medical Research Council Special Report, no. 20. London: HMSO.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raban, B. (1982). Text display effects on the fluency of young readers. Journal of Reading Research, 5, 7–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1984). Survey of teachers’ opinions: Children’s books and handwriting styles. In D. Dennis (Ed.), Reading: Meeting children’s special needs (pp. 123–129). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reynolds, L., & Walker, S. (2004). ‘You can’t see what the words say’: Word spacing and letter spacing in children’s reading books. Journal of Research in Reading, 27(1), 87–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reynolds, L., Walker, S., & Duncan, A. (2006). Children’s responses to line spacing in early reading books or ‘Holes to tell you which line you’re on’. Visible Language, 40(3), 246–267.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ripoll, J. C. (2015). Font legibility in first year primary students / Legibilidad de distintos tipos de letra en alumnus de primero de primaria. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 38(3), 600–616. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rockley, A. (1994). Planning a multimedia documentation project. Technical Communication, 41(4), 414–421.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roth, S. P., Schmutz, P., Pauwels, S. L., Bargas-Avila, J. A., & Opwis, K. (2010). Mental models for web objects: Where do users expect to find the most frequent objects in online shops, news portals, and company web pages? Interacting with Computers, 22(2), 140–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salmerón, L., & García, V. (2011). Reading skills and children’s navigation strategies in hypertext. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1143–1151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanocki, T. (1987). Visual knowledge underlying letter perception: Font-specific schematic tuning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(2), 267–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanocki, T., & Dyson, M. (2012). Letter processing and font information during reading: Beyond distinctiveness, where vision meets design. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(1), 132–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
dos Santos Lonsdale, M. (2014). Typographic features of text: Outcomes from research and practice. Visible Language, 48(3), 29–67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sassoon, R. (1993). Through the eyes of a child: Perception and type design. In R. Sassoon (Ed.), Computers and typography (pp. 150–177). Oxford: Intellect Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaikh, A. D., & Lenz, K. (2006). Where’s the search? Re-examining user expectations of web objects. Usability News, 8(1).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schriver, K. (1997). Dynamics in document design: Creating text for readers. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith. F. (1994). Understanding reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorkin, E. (2016). Optimizing type for use in specific media. In M. Dyson & C. Y. Suen, Digital fonts for reading. New Jersey: World Scientific. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Southall, R. (1984). First principles of typographic design for document production, TUGboat 5(2): 79–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1969). The visible word. London: Lund Humphries.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
TechKnowledge. (2014). The use of tablets in UK schools, a research report. September 2014, Techknowledge for Schools. Retrieved from [URL]
Tinker, M. (1968). Suitable typography for beginners in reading. Education, 88(4), 317–320.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Twyman, M. (1982). The graphic presentation of language. Information Design Journal, 3(1), 2–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Venezky, R. (1984). The history of reading research. In D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 3–38). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, S. (2001). Typography and language in everyday life: Prescriptions and practices. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). The songs the letters sing: Typography and children’s reading. Reading: National Centre for Language and Literacy.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Book design for children’s reading: Typography, pictures, print. London: St Bride Foundation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, S., & Reynolds, L. (2000). Screen design for children’s reading: Some key issues. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), 224–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, S., & Reynolds L. (2002/3). Serifs sans serif and infant characters in children’s reading books. Information Design Journal, 11(2/3), 106–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, S., Reynolds, L., & Edwards, V. (1999). Interactive multimedia in primary schools: Children’s use and understanding of informant texts on CD-ROM, and implications for teachers and designers. British Library Research and Innovation report 157. London: British Library.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waller, R. (1991). Typography and discourse. In R. Barr, et al., (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, 2 (pp. 341–380). New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Graphic literacies for a digital age: The survival of layout. The Information Society: An International Journal, 28(4), 236–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, L., & Nisbet, J. (1974). Legibility in children’s books: A review of research. Slough: NFER Publishing Company Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkins, A., Cleave, R. Grayson, N., & Wilson, L. (2009) Typography for children may be inappropriately designed, Journal of Research in Reading, 32(4), 351–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkins, A. J., Smith, J., Willison, C. K., Beare, T., Boyd, A., Hardy, G., Mell, L., Peach, C., & Harper, S. (2007). Stripes within words affect reading. Perception, 36(12), 1788–1803. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, T. R. (1993). What’s so different about visuals? Technical Communication, 40, 669–676.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, 3 (pp. 403–422). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winn, W. (1989). The design and use of instructional graphics. In H. Mandl & J. Levin (Eds.), Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures (pp. 125–144). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woods, R. J., Davis, K., & Scharff, L. V. F. (2005). Effects of typeface and font size on legibility for children. American Journal of Psychological Research, 1(1), 86–102.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, P., Lickorish, A., & Milroy, R. (1994). Remembering while mousing: The cognitive costs of mouse clicks. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 26(1), 41–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yule, V. (1988). The design of print for children: Sales-appeal and user-appeal. Reading, 22(2), 96–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zachrisson, B. (1965). Studies in the legibility of printed text. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Petrová, Zuzana
2022. Medium-specific aspects of digital reading and their impact on reading comprehension. Human Affairs 32:2 ► pp. 134 ff. DOI logo
Woiwod, Uta
2021. Adaptations of Print Narratives Into Literary Apps. In Connecting Disciplinary Literacy and Digital Storytelling in K-12 Education [Advances in Early Childhood and K-12 Education, ], ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Petrová, Zuzana & Rastislav Nemec
2019. Changing reading paths in a digital age: What are the consequences for meaning-making?. Journal of Pedagogy 10:2 ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Il lettore 'distratto' [Studi e saggi, 230], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue