Cover not available

In:Theories of Reading Development
Edited by Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton and Rauno K. Parrila
[Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15] 2017
► pp. 257281

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (124)
References
Baker, L. (1984). Children’s effective use of multiple standards for evaluating their comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 588–597. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnes, M. A., Ahmed, Y., Barth, A., & Francis, D. J. (2015). The Relation of Knowledge-Text Integration Processes and Reading Comprehension in 7th-to 12th-Grade Students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19, 253–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnes, M. A., Dennis, M., & Haefele-Kalvaitis, J. (1996). The effects of knowledge availability and knowledge accessibility on coherence and elaborative inferencing in children from six to fifteen years of age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 216–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnes, M. A., Faulkner, H., Wilkinson, M., & Dennis, M. (2004). Meaning construction and integration in children with hydrocephalus. Brain and Language, 89, 47–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnes, M. A., Huber, J., Johnston, A. M., & Dennis, M. (2007). A model of comprehension in spina bifida meningomyelocele: Meaning activation, integration, and revision. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13, 854–864. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnes, M. A., Raghubar, K. P., Faulkner, H., & Denton, C. A. (2014). The construction of visual – spatial situation models in children’s reading and their relation to reading comprehension. Journal of experimental child psychology, 119, 101–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavoiral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Grounded cognition: past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 716–724. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (1997). Cognitive neuropsychology and developmental disorders: Uncomfortable bedfellows. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 50, 899–923. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M., & Adams, C. (1992). Comprehension problems in children with specific language impairment: Literal and inferential meaning. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 119–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blewitt, P., & Toppino, T. C. (1991). The development of taxonomic structure in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 296–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blything, L., Davies, R., & Cain, K. (2015). Young children’s comprehension of temporal relations in complex sentences: the influence of memory on performance. Child Development, 86, 1922–1934. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bohn-Gettler, C. M., Rapp, D. N., van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & White, M. J. (2011). Adults’ and children’s monitoring of story events in the service of comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 39, 992–1011. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borella, E., Carretti, B., & Pelegrina, S. (2010). The specific role of inhibition in reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 541–552 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., & Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory; a constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braze, D., Mencl, W. E., Tabor, W., Pugh, K. R., Constable, R. T., Fulbright, R. K., … Shankweiler, D. P. (2011). Unification of sentence processing via ear and eye: an fMRI study. Cortex, 47, 416–431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cain, K., & Nash, H. (2011). The influence of connectives on young readers’ processing and comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 429–441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. E. (2000). Investigating the causes of reading comprehension failure: The comprehension-age match design. Reading and Writing, 12, 31–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making and its relation to comprehension failure. Reading and Writing. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 489–503. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cain, K., Towse, A. S., & Knight, R. (2009). The development of idiom comprehension: An investigation of semantic and contextual processing skills Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 98–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carretti, B., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Romano, M. (2005). Updating in working memory: A comparison of good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 45–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Case, R., Okamoto, Y., Griffin, S., McKeough, A., Bleiker, C., Henderson, B., … Keating, D. P. (1996). The role of central conceptual structures in the development of children’s thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61, 1–295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Catts, H. W., Hogan, T. P., & Adlof, S. M. (2005). Developmental changes in reading and reading disabilities. In H. W. Catts & A. G. Kamhi (Eds.), The connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 25–40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, L. B., Chaput, H. H., & Cashon, C. H. (2002). A constructivist model of infant cognition. Cognitive Development, 17, 1323–1343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge activation, integration, and validation during narrative text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 51, 26–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Passive activation and instantiation during reading. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook & R. F. Lorch (Eds.), Inference during reading (pp. 19–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Currie, N. K., & Cain, K. (2015). Children’s inference generation: the role of vocabulary and working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 137, 57–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422–433. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 51–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dekker, T. M., Mareschal, D., Johnson, M. H., & Sereno, M. I. (2014). Picturing words? Sensorimotor cortex activation for printed words in child and adult readers. Brain and Language, 139, 58–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087–1101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fecica, A. M., & O’Neill, D. K. (2010). A step at a time: Preliterate children’s simulation of narrative movement during story comprehension. Cognition, 116, 368–381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 825–850. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuhs, M. W., Nesbitt, K. T., Farran, D. C., & Dong, N. (2014). Longitudinal associations between executive functioning and academic skills across content areas. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1698–1709. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallagher, H. L., Happé, F., Brunswick, N., Fletcher, P. C., Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38, 11–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcia, J. R., & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: a meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English Review of Educational Research, 84, 74–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garner, R. (1980). Monitoring of understanding: An investigation of good and poor readers’ awareness of induced miscomprehension of text. Journal of Reading Behaviour, XII, 55–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garnham, A. (1979). Instantiation of verbs. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 207–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1981). Anaphoric reference to instances, instantiated and non‐instantiated categories: A reading time study. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 377–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Faust, M. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 245–262.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., Krull, D. S., & Pelham, B. W. (1988). Of thoughts unspoken: Social inference and the self-regulation of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 685–694. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Kaschak, M. P. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of language production and comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 91–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., & Faust, M. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 430–445.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., Witt, J. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2013). From the revolution to embodiment 25 years of cognitive psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 573–585. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 424–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., & Peterson, C. L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and interventions (pp. 1–13). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 231–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hagá, S., Garcia-Marques, L., & Olson, K. R. (2014). Too young to correct: A developmental test of the three-stage model of social inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(6), 9941012. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes, D. P., & Ahrens, M. (1988). Vocabulary simplification for children: A special case of ‘motherese’. Journal of Child Language, 15, 395–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Isberner, M. B., & Richter, T. (2014). Does validation during language comprehension depend on an evaluative mindset? Discourse Processes, 51, 7–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2009). Nativism versus neuroconstructivism: rethinking the study of developmental disorders. Developmental Psychology, 45, 56–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, J. M., Baillet, S. D., & Brown, P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 115–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendeou, P., Bohn-Gettler, C., White, M., & van den Broek, P. (2008). Children’s inference generation across different media. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 259–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendeou, P., Lynch, J. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., White, M., & Kremer, K. E. (2005). Developing successful readers: Building early narrative comprehension skills through television viewing and listening. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33, 91–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: the independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 765–778. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Y. S. (2015). Language and cognitive predictors of text comprehension: Evidence from multivariate analysis. Child Development, 86, 128–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhn, L. J., Willoughby, M. T., Wilbourn, M. P., Vernon‐Feagans, L., & Blair, C. B. (2014). Early communicative gestures prospectively predict language development and executive function in early childhood. Child Development, 85, 1898–1914.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LARRC. (2015). Learning to read: should we keep things simple? Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 151–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
& Logan, J. (in press). Pressure points in reading comprehension: A quantile multiple regression analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology.
, Jiang, H., & Farquharson, K. (under review). Are memory and attention equally important for reading and listening comprehension? A developmental comparison.
Lepola, J., Lynch, J. S., Laakkonen, E., Silven, M., & Niemi, P. (2012). The role of inference making and other language skills in the development of narrative listening comprehension in 4-6-year-old children. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 259–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindenberg, R., & Scheef, L. (2007). Supramodal language comprehension: role of the left temporal lobe for listening and reading. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2407–2415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locascio, G., Mahone, E. M., Eason, S., & Cutting, L. E. (2010). Executive dysfunction among children with reading comprehension deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 441–454. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorsbach, T. C., Katz, G. A., & Cupak, A. J. (1998). Developmental differences in the ability to inhibit the initial misinterpretation of garden path passages. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 275–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynch, J. S., van den Broek, P., Kremer, K., Kendeou, P., White, M. J., & Lorch, E. P. (2008). The development of narrative comprehension and its relation to other early reading skills. Reading Psychology, 29, 327–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Magliano, J. P., Miller, J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). Indexing space and time in film understanding. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 533–545. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 51, pp. 297–384). Burlington: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munte, T. F., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M. (1998). When temporal terms belie conceptual order. Nature, 395, 71–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40, 665–681. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading comprehension and word reading in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 91–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 554–566. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paris, A. H., & Paris, S. G. (2003). Assessing narrative comprehension in young children. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 36–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perez, A., Cain, K., Castellanos, M. C., & Bajo, T. (2015). Inferential updating in narrative texts: an ERP study. Memory and Cognition, 43, 1105–1135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading Ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). Verbal efficiency in reading ability. In M. Daneman, G., MacKinnon & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Reading Research: Advances in Theory and Practice (Vol. 6). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical basis of comprehension skill. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 67–86). Washington, DC, US: APA. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Stafura, J. Z. (2015). Comprehending implicit meanings in text without making inferences. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook & R. F. Lorch (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 1–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, New York: International Univeristy Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pike, M., Swank, P., Taylor, H., Landry, S., & Barnes, M. A. (2013). Effect of preschool working memory, language, and narrative abilities on inferential comprehension at school-age in children with Spina Bifida Myelomeningocele and typically developing children. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19, 390–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pike, M. M., Barnes, M. A., & Barron, R. W. (2010). The role of illustrations in children’s inferential comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 243–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. (2013). Semantic embodiment, disembodiment or misembodiment? In search of meaning in modules and neuron circuits. Brain and language, 127, 86–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pyykkönen, P., & Järvikivi, J. (2012). Children and situation models of multiple events. Developmental Psychology, 48, 521–529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E. (2001). Working memory and situation model updating. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1073–1080. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richter, T., Isberner, M.-B., Naumann, J., & Neeb, Y. (2013). Lexical quality and reading comprehension in primary school children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 415–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sachs, J. S. (1967). Recognition of semantic, syntactic, and lexical changes in sentences Psychonomic Bulletin, 1, 17–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
San Juan, V., Khu, M., & Graham, S. A. (2015). A New Perspective on Children’s Communicative Perspective Taking: When and How Do Children Use Perspective Inferences to Inform Their Comprehension of Spoken Language?. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 245–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Körkel, J., & Weinert, F. E. (1989). Domain-specific knowledge and memory performance: A comparison of high-and low-aptitude children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 306–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, C. M. (2009). A case for the sentence in reading comprehension. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 184–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seigneuric, A., Ehrlich, M.-F., Oakhill, J. V., & Yuill, N. M. (2000). Working memory resources and children’s reading comprehension. Reading and Writing. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13, 81–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sesma, H. W., Mahone, E. M., Levine, T., Eason, S. H., & Cutting, L. E. (2009). The contribution of executive skills to reading comprehension. Child Neuropsychology, 15, 232–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva, M. T., & Cain, K. (2015). The relations between lower- and higher-level oral language skills and their role in prediction of early reading comprehension Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 321–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Singer, M. (1994). Discourse inference processes. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 479–515). San Diego, CA US: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1993). Does reading make you smarter? Literacy and the development of verbal intelligence. In H. Reese (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior (Vol. 24, pp. 133–180): Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1982). Children’s concept of time: the development of story schema. In W. Friedman, J. (Ed.), The developmental psychology of time (pp. 255–282). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 381–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Therriault, D. J., Rinck, M., & Zwaan, R. A. (2006). Assessing the influence of dimensional focus during situation model construction. Memory & Cognition, 34, 78–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uttal, D. H., Fisher, J. A., & Taylor, H. A. (2006). Words and maps: developmental changes in mental models of spatial information acquired from descriptions and depictions. Developmental Science, 9, 221–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist approaches in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dyke, J. A., & Johns, C. L. (2012). Memory interference as a determinant of language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6, 193–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dyke, J. A., Johns, C. L., & Kukona, A. (2014). Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension. Cognition, 131, 373–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dyke, J. A., & Shankweiler, D. P. (2013). From verbal efficiency to lexical quality. In M. A. Britt, S. R. Goldman & J. F. Rouet (Eds.), Reading – from words to multiple texts (pp. 115–131). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & van Leeuwe, J. (2008). Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: a longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 407–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, J. H. Y., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between US and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolters, C. A., Denton, C. A., York, M. J., & Francis, D. J. (2014). Adolescents’ motivation for reading: group differences and relation to standardized achievement. Reading and Writing, 27, 503–533. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. H. (2006). Competence and control beliefs: Distinguishing the means and ends. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds) Handbook of educational psychology (2nd Ed, pp 349–367). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 920–933.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: reframing the discussion. Trends in cognitive sciences, 18, 229–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., & Madden, C. J. (2004). Updating Situation Models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 283–288.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (27)

Cited by 27 other publications

Altamura, Lidia, Cristina Vargas, M. Carmen Blanco-Gandía & Ladislao Salmerón
2025.  Validation of the multidimensional reading habits instrument for primary school students / Validación del instrumento multidimensional de hábitos lectores para estudiantes de educación primaria . Journal for the Study of Education and Development: Infancia y Aprendizaje 48:4  pp. 993 ff. DOI logo
Chan, Jessica, Miao Li, S. Hélène Deacon & John R. Kirby
2025. Summarizing expository text and the relationship to verbal ability and reading skills. The Journal of Educational Research  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Miller, Anna H., Daniel R. Espinas, Daniel McNeish & Marcia A. Barnes
2025. Dosage Response in Intensive Mathematics Interventions for Early Elementary Students With or At-Risk for Mathematics Learning Disability. Educational Psychology Review 37:4 DOI logo
Coggins, Joanne
2024. Righting Reading in Middle School: Readable English Helps Underperforming Adolescent Readers. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR) 29:4  pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Lei, Duo Liu, Jinjing Xiang & Dan Lin
2024. The dynamic relationship between phonological awareness, morphological awareness and character reading in chinese early readers: a three-year longitudinal study. Reading and Writing 37:7  pp. 1681 ff. DOI logo
龚, 逸天
2024. Cognitive Mechanisms and Intervention Strategies for Learning Disabilities in Children. Advances in Social Sciences 13:12  pp. 414 ff. DOI logo
Coggins, Joanne Veatch & Anastassia Zabrodskaja
2023. Using Readable English leads to reading gains for rural elementary students: An experimental study. PLOS ONE 18:7  pp. e0288292 ff. DOI logo
Hollander, John, John Sabatini, Art Graesser, Daphne Greenberg, Tenaha O’Reilly & Jan Frijters
2023. Importance of Learner Characteristics in Intelligent Tutoring for Adult Literacy. Discourse Processes 60:4-5  pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
Intepe-Tingir, Seyma & Kelly Whalon
2023. Teaching Emotion Vocabulary to Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. The Journal of Special Education 56:4  pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Phalen, Lisa A. & Laura C. Chezan
2023. Using the Question–Answer Relationship Strategy to Improve Listening Comprehension in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 53:1  pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Verhoeven, Ludo, Sonali Nag, Charles Perfetti & Kenneth Pugh
2023. Introduction. In Global Variation in Literacy Development,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
ÇELİKTEN DEMİREL, Serpil, Halime Miray SÜMER DODUR, Özlem ALTINDAĞ KUMAŞ & Yasemin YÜZBAŞIOĞLU
2023. Adaptation of the Listening Comprehension Test to Turkish Culture. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi 24:4  pp. 509 ff. DOI logo
Kearns, Devin M. & Elfrieda H. Hiebert
2022. The Word Complexity of Primary‐Level Texts: Differences Between First and Third Grade in Widely Used Curricula. Reading Research Quarterly 57:1  pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Piu, Angela
2022. Alla ricerca delle informazioni più importanti di un testo narrativo. Uno studio esplorativo nella scuola primaria. CADMO :1  pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Terry, Nicole Patton, Lynette Hammond Gerido, Cynthia U. Norris, Lakeisha Johnson & Callie Little
2022. Building a framework to understand and address vulnerability to reading difficulties among children in schools in the United States. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 2022:183-184  pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
van den Broek, Paul & Panayiota Kendeou
2022. Reading Comprehension I. In The Science of Reading,  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Verhoeven, Ludo & Karin Landerl
2022. Introduction to this Special Issue on Reading and its Development across Orthographies: State of the Science. Scientific Studies of Reading 26:2  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Verhoeven, Ludo & Charles Perfetti
2022. Universals in Learning to Read Across Languages and Writing Systems. Scientific Studies of Reading 26:2  pp. 150 ff. DOI logo
Fleury, Veronica P. & Jacqueline A. Towson
2021. Early Lessons Learned in Designing an Adaptive Shared Reading Intervention for Preschoolers With Autism. Exceptional Children 88:1  pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Fleury, Veronica P., Kelly Whalon, Carolyn Gilmore, Xiaoning Wang & Richard Marks
2021. Building Comprehension Skills of Young Children With Autism One Storybook at a Time. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 52:1  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Kotzer, Maddie, John R. Kirby & Lindsay Heggie
2021. Morphological Awareness Predicts Reading Comprehension in Adults. Reading Psychology 42:3  pp. 302 ff. DOI logo
Grabe, William & Fredricka L. Stoller
2020. Teaching Reading: Foundations and Practices. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hwang, HyeJin & Nell K. Duke
2020. Content Counts and Motivation Matters: Reading Comprehension in Third-Grade Students Who Are English Learners. AERA Open 6:1 DOI logo
Oakhill, Jane
2020. Four Decades of Research into Children’s Reading Comprehension: A Personal Review. Discourse Processes 57:5-6  pp. 402 ff. DOI logo
Sandro, Misciagna
2020. Neural Correlates in Learning Disabilities. In Learning Disabilities - Neurological Bases, Clinical Features and Strategies of Intervention, DOI logo
Solari, Emily J., Nicole Patton Terry, Nadine Gaab, Tiffany P. Hogan, Nancy J. Nelson, Jill M. Pentimonti, Yaacov Petscher & Sarah Sayko
2020. Translational Science: A Road Map for the Science of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly 55:S1 DOI logo
Zhang, Dongbo & Sihui Ke
2020. The Simple View of Reading Made Complex by Morphological Decoding Fluency in Bilingual Fourth‐Grade Readers of English. Reading Research Quarterly 55:2  pp. 311 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue