Cover not available

In:Theories of Reading Development
Edited by Kate Cain, Donald L. Compton and Rauno K. Parrila
[Studies in Written Language and Literacy 15] 2017
► pp. 99–122

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Opening the “black box” of learning to read

Inductive learning mechanisms supporting word acquisition development with a focus on children who struggle to read

 | Florida State University
 | Middle Tennessee State University
 | Florida State University
Published online: 14 August 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.15.06ste
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Statistical learning mechanisms: Structured probabilistic vs. dynamic systems
  • Analogical reasoning as an inductive mechanism for transfer
  • Adding inductive learning to an individual difference model of reading development
  • The role of inductive learning in reading development
    • Orthographic learning
    • Vocabulary acquisition
  • Support for the role of inductive learning supporting reading development
    • Orthographic learning
      • Experimental statistical learning tasks and reading outcomes
      • Relationship between longterm statistical learning and reading outcomes
      • Optimizing the statistical learning environment
      • Analogical reasoning and basic transfer
    • Vocabulary acquisition
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (99)
References
Altmann, G. T. M. (2010). Why emergentist accounts of cognition are more theoretically constraining than structured probability accounts: Comment on Griffiths et al. and McClelland et al. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp.77–117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, v–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Apfelbaum, K. S., Hazeltine, E., & McMurray, B. (2013). Statistical learning in reading: Variability in irrelevant letters helps children learn phonics skills. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1348–1365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arciuli, J., Monaghan, P., & Seva, N. (2010). Learning to assign lexical stress during reading aloud: Corpus, behavioral, and computational investigations. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 180–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arciuli, J., & Simpson, I. C. (2012). Statistical learning is related to reading ability in children and adults. Cognitive Science, 36, 286–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (2012). Statistical learning: From acquiring specific items to forming general rules. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 170–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., & Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 9, 321–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnes, M. A., Davis, C., Priebe, S., Arrington, N., Francis, D., & Fletcher, J. (July, 2012). Word-level, text-level and general purpose cognitive skills in struggling adolescent readers: Implications for assessment and intervention. In M. W. Lovett & D. Greenberg (Chairs), Assessment and intervention research with struggling adolescent and adult readers. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W. (1994). The varieties of orthographic knowledge I: Theoretical and developmental issues. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2002). Multiple orthographic and phonological codes in literacy acquisition: An evolving research program. In D. L. Molfese & V. J. Molfese (Eds.), Developmental variations in learning: Applications to social, executive function, language, and reading skills. (pp. 275–308). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biemiller, A. (2003). Vocabulary: Needed if more children are to read well. Reading Psychology, 24, 323–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 498–520. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brasseur-Hock, I., Hock, M. F., Kieffer, M. J., Biancarosa, G., & Deshler, D. D. (2011). Adolescent struggling readers in urban schools: Results of a latent class analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 438–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, A. L. (1989). Analogical reasoning and transfer: What develops? In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 369–412). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990). Domain-specific principles affect learning and transfer in children. Cognitive Science, 14, 107–133.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics’ phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874–886. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 671–681. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F. (2007). Fostering morphological processing, vocabulary development, and reading comprehension. In R. Wagner, A. Muse, & K. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 78–103). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, V., & S Savage, R. (2014). Evidence for a simplicity principle: teaching common complex grapheme‐to‐phonemes improves reading and motivation in at‐risk readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 37, 196–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Compton, D. L., Miller, A. C., Elleman, A. M., & Steacy, L. M. (2014). Have we forsaken reading theory in the name of “quick fix” interventions for children with reading disability? Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 55–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934–945. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, 22, 8–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Currie, N. K., & Cain, K. (2015). Children’s inference generation: The role of vocabulary and working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 137, 57–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Conrad, N., & Pacton, S. (2008). A statistical learning perspective on children’s learning about graphotactic and morphological regularities in spelling. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49, 118–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durso, F. T., & Shore, W. J. (1991). Partial knowledge of word meanings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 190–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 5–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C., & Saltmarsh, J. (1995). Beginning readers outperform older disabled readers in learning to read words by sight. Reading and Writing, 7, 295–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elleman, A. M., Lindo, E. J., Morphy, P., & Compton, D. L. (2009). The impact of vocabulary instruction on passage-level comprehension of school-age children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 1–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, J. L., Saffran, J. R., & Robe-Torres, K. (2009). Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 321–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farrington‐Flint, L., Wood, C., Canobi, K. H., & Faulkner, D. (2004). Patterns of analogical reasoning among beginning readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 226–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuch, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2006). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2015). Rethinking service delivery for students with significant learning problems: Developing and implementing intensive instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 36, 105–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fukkink, R. G., & de Glopper, K. (1998). Effects of instruction in deriving word meaning from context: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 68, 450–469. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goswami, U. (1986). Children’s use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 73–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gough, P. B., Juel, C., & Griffith, P. L. (1992). Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 35–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Griffiths, T. L., Chater, N., Kemp, C., Perfors, A., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2010). Probabilistic models of cognition: Exploring representations and inductive biases. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 357–364. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review, 114, 211–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, A., & Jacobson, M. (1982). Basic reading vocabulary. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491–528. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Analogy and relational reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 234–259). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. R., Stein, M. L., & Wysocki, K. (1984). Learning vocabulary through reading. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 767–787. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keil, F. C. (2015). Developmental insights into mature cognition. Cognition, 135, 10–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kintsch W., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Comprehension. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 209–226). Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lawrence, J. F., Crosson, A. C., Paré-Blagoev, E. J., & Snow, C. E. (2015). Word generation randomized trial: Discussion mediates the impact of program treatment on academic word learning. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 750–786. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loftus, S. M., Coyne, M. D., McCoach, D. B., Zipoli, R., & Pullen, P. C. (2010). Effects of a supplemental vocabulary intervention on the word knowledge of kindergarten students at risk for language and literacy difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 124–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcus, G. F., & Davis, E. (2013). How robust are probabilistic models of higher-level cognition? Psychological Science, 24, 2351–2360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McClelland, J. L., Botvinick, M. M., Noelle, D. C., Plaut, D. C., Rogers, T. T., Seidenberg, M. S., & Smith, L. B. (2010). Letting structure emerge: Connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 348–356. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKeown, M. G., & Beck, I. L. (2014). Effects of vocabulary instruction on measures of language processing: Comparing two approaches. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29, 520–530. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Movellan, J. R., & McClelland, J. L. (1993). Learning continuous probability distributions with symmetric diffusion networks. Cognitive Science, 17, 463–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagy, W., Anderson, R., & Herman, P. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 237–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 85–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
National Institutes of Children’s Health and Development. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching students to read: An evidenced-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Connor, R., & Fuchs, L. S. (2013). Responsiveness to intervention in the elementary grades: Implications for early childhood education. In V. Buysse, E. Peisner-Feinberg, & J. Cantler (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention (RTI) in early childhood education (pp. 41–56). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pacton, S., Fayol, M., & Perruchet, P. (2005). Children’s implicit learning of graphotactic and morphological regularities. Child Development, 76, 324–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: the case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pearson, P. D., Valencia, S. W., & Wixson, K. (2014). Complicating the world of reading assessment: Toward better assessments for better teaching. Theory Into Practice, 53, 236–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problems in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In Snowling M. J. & Hulme C. (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (227–247). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perruchet, P., & Pacton, S. (2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 233–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., Braun, M., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Rules versus statistics in reading aloud: New evidence on an old debate. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 798–812. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the connectionist dual process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 106–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Proctor, C. P., Carlo, M., August, D., & Snow, C. (2005). Native Spanish-Speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 246–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pullen, P. C., Tuckwiller, E. D., Ashworth, K., Lovelace, S. P., & Cash, D. (2011). Implementing intensive vocabulary instruction for students at risk for reading disability. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 145–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayner, K, Foorman, B., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reitsma, P. (1983). Printed word learning in beginning readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 36, 321–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). Language acquisition and use: Learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science, 275, 1599–1603. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sénéchal, M., Gingras, M., and L’Heureux, L. (2016). Modeling spelling acquisition: The effect of orthographic regularities on silent-letter representations. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 155–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ševa, N., Monaghan, P., & Arciuli, J. (2009). Stressing what is important: Orthographic cues and lexical stress assignment. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 237–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shefelbine, J. L. (1990). Student factors related to variability in learning word meanings from context. Journal of Literacy Research, 22, 71–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, D.C.: National Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sparks, E., & Deacon, S. H. (2015). Morphological awareness and vocabulary acquisition: A longitudinal examination of their relationship in English-speaking children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 299–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer, M., Kaschak, M. P., Jones, J. L., & Lonigan, C. J. (2015). Statistical learning is related to early literacy-related skills. Reading and Writing, 28, 467–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stahl, S. A., & Nagy, W. (2006). Teaching word meanings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swanborn, M. S. L., & de Glopper, K. (1999). Incidental word learning while reading: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 261–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, J. B., Griffiths, T. L., & Kemp, C. (2006). Theory-based bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 309–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torgesen, J. K. (1998). Catch them before they fall: Identification and assessment to prevent reading failure in young children. American Educator, 22, 32–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Gordon, J., Boada, R., Peterson, R. L., & Pennington, B. F. (2014). Statistical learning, letter reversals, and reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 383–394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2006). Spelling as statistical learning: Using consonantal context to spell vowels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 642–652. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Bick, S. (2003). Influence of consonantal context on the pronunciation of vowels: A comparison of human readers and computational models. Cognition, 88, 49–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Kessler, B., Zevin, J. D., Bick, S., & Davis, M. (2006). Influence of consonantal context on the reading of vowels: Evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Venezky, R. L. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). The American way of spelling: The structure and origins of American English Orthography. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vousden, J. I., Ellefson, M. R., Solity, J., & Chater, N. (2011). Simplifying reading: Applying the simplicity principle to reading. Cognitive Science, 35, 34–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 848–872. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoshida, H., & Smith, L. (2003). Shifting ontological boundaries: How Japanese-and English-speaking children generalize names for animals and artifacts. Developmental Science, 6, 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, C. (2008). A statistical associative account of vocabulary growth in early word learning. Language Learning and Development, 4, 32–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2007). Rapid word learning under uncertainty via cross-situational statistics. Psychological Science, 18, 414–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Modeling cross-situational word – referent learning: Prior questions. Psychological Review, 119, 21–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yurovsky, D., Fricker, D. C., Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2014). The role of partial knowledge in statistical word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Conrad, Nicole J. & S. Hélène Deacon
2023. Print Learning: A Theoretical Framework for the Role of Children's Learning about the Orthography in the Development of Reading Skill. Reading Research Quarterly 58:1 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Edwards, Ashley A., Laura M. Steacy, Valeria M. Rigobon, Yaacov Petscher & Donald L. Compton
2023. Examining the Relationship Between Word Reading and Nonword Reading Development Within an Orthographic Learning Framework. The Elementary School Journal 123:3 ► pp. 396 ff. DOI logo
Steacy, Laura M., Ashley A. Edwards, Jay G. Rueckl, Yaacov Petscher & Donald L. Compton
2021. Modeling and Visualizing the Codevelopment of Word and Nonword Reading in Children From First Through Fourth Grade: Informing Developmental Trajectories of Children With Dyslexia. Child Development 92:3 DOI logo
Savage, Robert, George Georgiou, Rauno Parrila, Kristina Maiorino, Kristy Dunn & Giovani Burgos
2020. The Effects of Teaching Complex Grapheme-Phoneme Correspondences: Evidence from a Dual Site Cluster Trial with At-Risk Grade 2 Students. Scientific Studies of Reading 24:4 ► pp. 321 ff. DOI logo
Tibi, Sana, Ashley A. Edwards, Christopher Schatschneider & John R. Kirby
2020. Predicting Arabic word reading: A cross-classified generalized random-effects analysis showing the critical role of morphology. Annals of Dyslexia 70:2 ► pp. 200 ff. DOI logo
Elleman, Amy M., Laura M. Steacy & Donald L. Compton
2019. The Role of Statistical Learning in Word Reading and Spelling Development: More Questions Than Answers. Scientific Studies of Reading 23:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
O’Brien, Beth A., Malikka Habib & Luca Onnis
2019. Technology-Based Tools for English Literacy Intervention: Examining Intervention Grain Size and Individual Differences. Frontiers in Psychology 10 DOI logo
Schmalz, Xenia, Kristina Moll, Claudio Mulatti & Gerd Schulte-Körne
2019. Is Statistical Learning Ability Related to Reading Ability, and If So, Why?. Scientific Studies of Reading 23:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue