Article published In: Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 7:1 (2017) ► pp.129–169
Effects of exposure to literary narrative fiction
From book smart to street smart?
Published online: 23 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.7.1.06dem
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.7.1.06dem
Abstract
Literary narrative fiction may be particularly effective in enhancing Theory of Mind (ToM), as it requires readers to contemplate author and character intentions in filling the literary ‘gaps’ that have been suggested to characterise this fiction type. The current study investigates direct and cumulative effects of reading literature on ToM using confirmatory Bayesian analyses. Direct effects were assessed by comparing the ToM skills of participants who read texts that were manipulated to differ in the amount of gap filling they required. Cumulative effects were assessed by considering the relationship between lifetime literary fiction exposure and ToM. Results showed no evidence for direct effects of reading literature on ToM. However, lifetime literary fiction exposure was associated with higher ToM, particularly cognitive ToM. Although reading a specific piece of literary fiction may thus not have immediately measurable effects on ToM, lifetime exposure to this fiction type is associated with more advanced ToM.
Article outline
- Narrative fiction and understanding others’ mental states
- What are the ‘active ingredients’ of narrative fiction that enhance ToM?
- Literary narrative fiction and ToM: The relevance of ‘gaps’
- Competing hypotheses regarding effects of narrative fiction exposure on ToM
- Method
- Participants
- Materials
- Measures
- Lifetime fiction exposure
- ToM
- Procedure
- Data analysis
- Direct effects
- Cumulative effects
- Results
- Descriptive statistics and correlations
- Effects of text literariness: Direct effects
- Cumulative effects: Narrative fiction and ToM over the lifetime
- Discussion
- Direct effects of exposure to (literary) narrative fiction on ToM
- Cumulative effects of exposure to narrative fiction over the lifetime on ToM
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
Cited by (18)
Cited by 18 other publications
Appel, Markus, Juliane Gabel, Lena Wimmer, Marieke Klöppel & Tobias Richter
Schwerin, Julia, Jan Lenhart & Tobias Richter
Wu, Yang, Xiping Liu & Shengnan Zhang
Rivero-Contreras, Miriam, David Saldaña & Martina Micai
Eekhof, Lynn S., Kobie van Krieken & Roel M. Willems
Jin, Jian & Siyun Liu
van der Kleij, Sanne W., Ian Apperly, Laura R. Shapiro, Jessie Ricketts & Rory T. Devine
Chlebuch, Natasha, Thalia R. Goldstein & Deena Skolnick Weisberg
Nicholes, Justin
2020. Science fiction prototyping’s features and impact on college students’ perceptions of writing. Scientific Study of Literature 10:1 ► pp. 98 ff.
Turner, Rose & Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau
Chilton, Helen, Connie Mayer & Wendy McCracken
Deane, Paul, Swapna Somasundaran, René R. Lawless, Hilary Persky & Colleen Appel
Vaziri, H., L. Tay, M. G. Keith & J. O. Pawelski
Carpenter, Jordan M., Melanie C. Green & Kaitlin Fitzgerald
Oatley, Keith, Robin Dunbar & Felix Budelmann
Turner, Rose & Fatima M. Felisberti
2018. Relationships between fiction media, genre, and empathic abilities. Scientific Study of Literature 8:2 ► pp. 261 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
