Article published In: Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 7:1 (2017) ► pp.109–128
Mediated relationships with TV characters
The effects of perceived and actual similarity in personality traits
Published online: 23 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.7.1.05coh
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.7.1.05coh
Abstract
Five TV actors completed the Big Five personality scale for a character they played on a popular Israeli TV comedy. Viewers of each of these series completed the same scales both for themselves and as they thought the characters would have completed them. They then completed parasocial relationship and identification scales with respect to the same character. Perceived and measured similarity scores (i.e., using the actors’ scores) were computed for each viewer-character pair. These similarity scores were then used to predict both parasocial relationship strength and the degree of identification. Results show that perceived and measured similarity are mostly unrelated and that perceived similarity, but not measured similarity, is related to parasocial relationships and identification. Implications of these results for mediated relationships theory and measurement validity are discussed.
Article outline
- Similarity, identification, and parasocial relationships
- Parasocial relationships
- Identification
- Parasocial relationships
- Similarity and perceived similarity
- External and internal similarity
- Hypotheses
- Method
- Overview
- Sample
- The characters
- Measures
- The Five Factor Model (FFM)
- Results
- Preliminary analysis
- Hypotheses testing
- Discussion
- Perceived similarity is not a proxy for similarity
- Differences between parasocial relationships and identification
- Limitations and future direction
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (44)
Branch, S. E., Wilson, K. M., & Agnew, C. R. (2013). Committed to Oprah, Homer, or House: Using the investment model to understand parasocial relationships. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(2), 96.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Livi, S. (1994). Mapping personality dimensions in the Big Five model. European Review of Applied Psychology, 441, 9–15.
Cohen, E. L. (2010). Expectancy violations in relationships with friends and media figures. Communication Research Reports, 27(2), 97–111.
Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 245–264.
(2009). Mediated Relationships and Media Effects: Parasocial Interaction and Identification. In R. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Media Processes and Effects (pp. 223–236). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cohen, J., Weimann-Saks, D. & Mazor-Tregerman, M. (2017). Does Character Similarity Increase Identification and Persuasion? Media Psychology, 1–>23, Published online: 04 Apr 2017.
Cole, T., & Leets, L. (1999). Attachment styles and intimate television viewing: Insecurely forming relationships in a parasocial way. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(4), 495–511. .
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-P) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: a revision of the NEO personality inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(9), 887–898. .
De Graaf, A. (2014). The Effectiveness of Adaptation of the Protagonist in Narrative Impact: Similarity Influences Health Beliefs through Self‐Referencing. Human Communication Research, 40(1), 73–90.
Eyal, K., & Rubin, A. M. (2003). Viewer aggression and homophily, identification, and parasocial relationships with television characters. Journal of Broadcasting& Electronic Media, 47(1), 77–98. .
Etzion, D., & Laski, S. (1998).
The “Big Five” Inventory – Hebrew Version by Permission. Tel Aviv University, Faculty of management, the Institute of Business Research.
Eyal, K., & Dailey, R. M. (2012). Examining relational maintenance in parasocial relationships. Mass Communication and Society, 15(5), 758–781.
Feilitzen, C., and Linné, O. (1975). Identifying with television characters. Journal of Communication, 25(4), 51–55.
Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3), 279–305.
Hartmann, T., & Goldhoorn, C. (2011). Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of communication, 61(6), 1104–1121.
Hoeken, H., Kolthoff, M., & Sanders, J. (2016). Story Perspective and Character Similarity as Drivers of Identification and Narrative Persuasion. Article first published online: 2 FEB 2016, Human Communication Research.
Hoffner, C. (1996). Children’s wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40(3), 389–402.
Hoffner, C., & Cantor, J. (1991). Perceiving and responding to mass media characters. In J. Bryant and D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 63–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229.
Kaufman, G. F., Libby, L. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 1–19.
Klimmt, C., Hartmann, T., & Schramm, H. (2006). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.). Psychology of entertainment, (PP. 291–313), Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Konjin, E. A., Nije Bijvank, M., & Bushman, B. J. (2007). I wish I were a warrior: the role of wishful identification in the effects of violent video games on aggression in adolescent boys. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 1038.
Maccoby, E. E. & Wilson, W. C. (1957). Identification and observational learning from films. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55(1), 76–87.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins & L. A. Pervin (eds.). Handbook of personality: Theory and research (third edition) (pp. 159–181). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
McKinley, C. J. (2010). Examining dimensions of character involvement as contributing factors in television viewers’ binge drinking perceptions. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Arizona. Retrieved from [URL]
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology, 271, 415–444.
Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R., (1995). The Big Five Personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resources management. Research in Personality and Human Resource Management, 131, 153–200.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2(1999), 102–138.
Perse, E. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1989). Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. Communication Research, 16(1), 59–77. .
Rubin, R. B., & McHugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 31(3), 279–292.
Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12(2), 155–180.
Schramm, H., & Wirth, W. (2015). Testing a universal tool for measuring parasocial interactions across different situations and media. Journal of Media Psychology, 22(1), pp. 26–36.
Silvia, P. J. (2005). Deflecting reactance: The role of similarity in increasing compliance and reducing resistance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(3), 277–284.
Simons, H. W., Berkowitz, N. N., & Moyer, R. J. (1970). Similarity, credibility, and attitude change: A review and a theory. Psychological Bulletin, 73(1), 1.
Tian, Q., & Hoffner, C. A. (2010). Parasocial interaction with liked, neutral, and disliked characters on a popular TV series. Mass Communication and Society, 13(3), 250–269.
Tukachinsky, R. (2014). Experimental Manipulation of Psychological Involvement with Media. Communication Methods and Measures, 8(1), 1–33.
Tukachinsky, R., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2013). The effects of engagement with entertainment. In E. L. Cohen (Ed.), Communication yearbook 37 (pp. 287–321). New York, NY: Routledge.
Cited by (17)
Cited by 17 other publications
Brooks, John J., Christopher M. Dobmeier & Nathan Walter
Carbone, Luca, Christoph Klimmt & Laura Vandenbosch
Ferchaud, Arienne, Ashley Johns & Emory S. Daniel
Żerebecki, Bartosz G., Suzanna J. Opree & Joep Hofhuis
Huang, Kate Y., Helene H. Fung & Peifeng Sun
Lin, Sheng-Wei & Chia-Ding Huang
Marple, Catherine A. & Marina Krcmar
Olbermann, Zoe, Hannah Schrand & Holger Schramm
Żerebecki, Bartosz G., Suzanna J. Opree, Joep Hofhuis & Susanne Janssen
Möri, Michelle & Andreas Fahr
Igartua, Juan-José, Alejandro González-Vázquez & Carlos Arcila-Calderón
Igartua, Juan-José & Iñigo Guerrero-Martín
Ma, Zexin
Żerebecki, Bartosz G., Esther van der Vliet & Julia Kneer
Guerrero-Martín, Iñigo & Juan-José Igartua
Tukachinsky, Riva, Nathan Walter & Camille J Saucier
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
