Article published In: Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 7:1 (2017) ► pp.52–78
Perceptual qualities of literary style
Published online: 23 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.7.1.03sie
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.7.1.03sie
Abstract
This article reports the results of a study that investigated different aspects of the aesthetic perception of literary style. Excerpts from novels belonging to two broadly defined literary style categories, namely modern and postmodern style, were judged by the participants. Semantic scales corresponding to perceptual qualities of modern and postmodern literature were used. The results indicate that these scales can measure perceptual differences between the selected novels, and that the two novels categorized as modern were experienced differently from those categorized as postmodern. Some of the scales also predicted aesthetic preference for novels. Rating differences on the two scales incoherent – coherent and formal – colloquial predicted the ability to attribute novel excerpts. This finding seems to indicate that the ability to distinguish styles in regard to perceptual qualities helps readers to judge certain similarities of novels.
Article outline
- Research on literary style
- The perceptual dimension of literary style
- Theory and methods
- Measuring perceptual qualities with semantic scales
- Hypotheses and predictions
- The study
- Participants
- Materials
- Study design and procedure
- Results
- Semantic scales and perceptual qualities of style
- Relations between semantic scales and aesthetic preference
- Attribution of excerpts to novels
- General discussion
- Limitations and further work
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (56)
Auer, P. (1989). Natürlichkeit und Stil. In V. Hinnenkamp & M. Selting (Eds.), Stil und Stilisierung: Arbeiten zur interpretativen Soziolinguistik (pp. 27–59). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Behrend, T. S., Sharek, D. J., Meade, A. W., & Wiebe, E. N. (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods 43(3), 800–813.
Bubenhofer, N., & Scharloth, J. (2012). Stil als Kategorie der soziopragmatischen Sprachgeschichte. In P. Maitz (Ed.), Historische Sprachwissenschaft: Erkenntnisinteressen, Grundlagenprobleme, Desiderate (pp. 227–261). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(1), 3–5.
Croce, B. (1937). La poesia. Introduzione alla critica e storia della poesia e della letteratura. Bari: Laterza.
Cupchik, B. C., Leonard, G., Axelrad, E., & Kalin, J. D. (1998). The landscape of emotion in literary encounters. Cognition and Emotion, 12(6), 825–847.
Damiani, A., Jeric, D., Imberty, M., & Belardinelli, M. O. (2004). Evaluation of the musical style using the semantic differential technique and a fuzzy graphic rating scale. In S. D. Libscomb, R. Ashley, R. O. Gjerdingen, & P. Webster (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Music Perception & Cognition (pp. 410–412). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University School of Music.
Dittmar, N. (2009). Stil und Sozialität (Gruppe, Alter, Geschlecht). In U. Fix, A. Gardt, & J. Knape. (2008–2009), Rhetorik und Stylistik/Rhetoric and Stylistics: Ein internationales Handbuch historischer und systematischer Forschung, Vol. 21 (pp. 1245–1270), Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
Fix, U., Wellmann, H. (Eds.) (1997). Stile, Stilprägungen, Stilgeschichte: Über Epochen-, Gattungs- und Autorenstile, sprachliche Analysen und didaktische Aspekte. Heidelberg: Winter.
Fix, U., Gardt, A., & Knape, J. (Eds.) (2008–2009). Rhetorik und Stylistik/Rhetoric and Stylistics: Ein internationales Handbuch historischer und systematischer Forschung (Vols. 1–2). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
Green, K. (2006). Literary theory and stylistics. In E. K. Brown, R. E. Asher, & J. M. Y. Simpson, Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed.), Vol. 71 (pp. 261–267). New York: Elsevier.
Habscheid, S. (Ed.) (2003). Gruppenstile: Zur sprachlichen Inszenierung sozialer Zugehörigkeit. Bern: Lang.
Hoover, D. L. (2002). Frequent word sequences and statistical stylistics. Literary & Linguistic Computing, 17(2), 157–180.
Jürgens, C. (1999, August 5). Das Monster ist ein Moralist. Zeit online. [URL]
Knoop, C. A., Wagner, V., Jacobsen, T., & Menninghaus, W. (2016). Mapping the aesthetic space of literature “from below”. Poetics.
Kraus, J. (1987). On the sociolinguistic aspects of the notion of functional style
. In J. Chloupek & J. Nekvapil (Eds.), Reader in Czech Sociolinguistics (pp. 83–93). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Lowe, D., & Matthews, R. (1995). A stylometric analysis by radial basis functions. Computers and the Humanities, 291, 449–461.
Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2007). Negative priming as a memory phenomenon: A review of 20 years of negative priming research. Journal of Psychology, 215(1), 35–51.
Müller, W. G. (2009). Epochenstil/Zeitstil. In U. Fix, A. Gardt, & J. Knape. (2008–2009), Rhetorik und Stylistik/Rhetoric and Stylistics: Ein internationales Handbuch historischer und systematischer Forschung, Vol. 21 (pp. 1271–1285), Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
Neme, A., Pulido, J. R. G., Muñoz, A., Hernández, S., & Dey, T. (2015). Stylistics analysis and authorship attribution algorithms based on self-organizing maps. Neurocomputing, 1471, 147–159.
Nöth, W. (2009). Stil als Zeichen. In U. Fix, A. Gardt, & J. Knape. (2008–2009), Rhetorik und Stylistik/Rhetoric and Stylistics: Ein internationales Handbuch historischer und systematischer Forschung, Vol. 21 (pp. 1178–1196), Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957), The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 51, 411–419.
Reich-Ranicki, M. (2008, December 8). Was denken Sie von Hemingway? FAZ online. [URL]
Salimpoor, V. N. (2003). The effect of odor-manipulated context on hedonic evaluations and experience of literature. Journal of Young Investigators 11. [URL]
Scharloth, J. & Bubenhofer, N. (2012). Datengeleitete Korpuspragmatik: Korpusvergleich als Methode der Stilanalyse. In E. Felder, M. Müller, & F. Vogel (Eds.), Korpuspragmatik. Thematische Korpora als Basis diskurslinguistischer Analysen (pp. 195–230). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
Sedelow, S. Y., & Sedelow, W. A. (1972). Models, computing, and stylistics. In B. B. Kachru & H. F. Stahlke (Eds.), Current trends in stylistics (pp. 275–286). Edmonton: Linguistic Research.
Semino, E., & Culpeper, J. (Eds.) (2002). Cognitive stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Siefkes, M. (2011). Style: A new semiotic view on an old problem. Kodikas/Code. Ars Semeiotica 34, 1/2, 15–25.
(2012). Stil als Zeichenprozess: Wie Variation bei Verhalten, Artefakten und Texten Information erzeugt. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
(2013). The experimental aesthetics of style. Research report, IUAV Venice. [URL]
Siefkes, M., & Arielli, E. (2015). An experimental approach to multimodality: How musical and architectural styles interact in aesthetic perception. In J. Wildfeuer (Ed.), Building bridges for multimodal research. International perspectives on theories and practices of multimodal analysis (pp. 247–265). Bern & New York: Lang.
Simpson, P. (2014). Stylistics: A resource book for students (2nd ed.). London & New York: Routledge.
Snider, J. G., & Osgood, C. E. (1969). Semantic differential technique. A sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine.
Spillner, B. (1995). Stilsemiotik. In G. Stickel (Ed.), Stilfragen (pp. 62–93). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
Spitzer, L. (1948). Linguistics and literary history: Essays in stylistics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Stewart, L. L. (2006). Computational stylistics. In E. K. Brown, R. E. Asher, & J. M. Y. Simpson, Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed.), Vol. 21 (pp. 769–775).
Sutherland, F. (1972). The style of innocence. A study of Hemingway and Callaghan. Toronto: Clarke & Irwin.
Thomaneck, J. (1969). Ernest Hemingway. Adverb und Adjektiv als Stil- und Deutungsmittel. PhD thesis, University of Kiel.
Tuldava, J. (2005). Stylistics, author identification. In R. Köhler, G. Altmann, & R. G. Piotrowski (Eds.), Quantitative Linguistik: Ein internationales Handbuch (pp. 368–387). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., & Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 8(4), 336–342.
