Article published In: Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 6:2 (2016) ► pp.298–313
Emotional effects of poetic phonology, word positioning and dominant stress peaks in poetry reading
Published online: 30 March 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.2.06kra
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.2.06kra
Abstract
This study tested the hypothesis that features of linguistically non-mandatory phonological recurrence (rhyme, alliteration,
assonance, and consonance), parameters of word positioning (position within a line and line position) and dominant stress peaks
are related to readers’ identification of distinctively joyful and sad words in poetry. To this end, forty-eight participants read
eight German poems, completed an underlining task, and filled out a brief questionnaire. Results show that these target features
are clearly of importance for readers’ perception of pronounced levels of joy and sadness. Words featuring alliteration, assonance
or consonance were significantly more often underlined as distinctively joyful than were words that lack these features. Our study
shows also that words that feature a dominant stress peak and are placed in more advanced positions within the poems were more
likely to be identified as emotional (distinctively joyful and sad) when compared to words in earlier and unstressed
positions.
Keywords: poetry, joy, sadness, dominant stress peaks, underlining task, poetic phonology, word position
Article outline
- Introduction
- Material and methods
- Selected stimuli
- Participants
- Questionnaire and underlining task
- Text analyses
- Statistical analyses
- Results
- Discussion and outlook
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (47)
Aryani, A., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2013). Extracting Salient Sublexical Units from Written Texts:“EMOPHON”, a Corpus-Based Approach to Phonological Iconicity. Frontiers in Psychology, 41.
Aryani, A., Kraxenberger, M., Ullrich, S., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2016). Measuring the basic affective tone of poems via phonological saliency and iconicity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(2), 191–204.
Auracher, J., Albers, S., Zhai, Y., Gareeva, G., & Stavniychuk, T. (2010). P is for Happiness, N is for Sadness: Universals in Sound Iconicity to Detect Emotions in Poetry. Discourse Processes, 481, 1–25.
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory & Language, 59(4), 390–412.
Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn, M. A. (2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 1–8.
Cutler, A. (1976). Phoneme-monitoring reaction time as a function of preceding intonation contour. Perception & Psychophysics, 20(1), 55–60.
Damasio, A. R. (1994) Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.
Demmerling, C., & Landweer, H. (2007). Philosophie der Gefühle: Von Achtung bis Zorn. Stuttgart: Metzler.
Hanauer, D. (1996). Integration of phonetic and graphic features in poetic text categorization judgements. Poetics, 23(5), 363–380.
Jacobs, A. M., Lüdtke, J., & Meyer-Sickendiek, B. (2013). Bausteine einer Neurokognitiven Poetik: Foregrounding/Backgrounding, lyrische Stimmung und ästhetisches Gefallen. Elements of a neurocognitive poetics: Foregrounding/backgrounding, typical mood, and aesthetic pleasure) in Stimmung und Methode (Mood and Method), ed. B. Meyer-Sickendiek and F. Reents (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 63–94.
Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. Towards a cognitive neuroscience of natural language use, 135–159.
Jespersen, O. (1933) Linguistica : selected papers in English, French and German. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.
Kraxenberger, M., & Menninghaus, W. (2016). Mimological Reveries? Disconfirming the Hypothesis of Phono-Emotional Iconicity in Poetry. Frontiers in Psychology, 71,
Lausberg, H. (2008) Handbuch der Rhetorik: Eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Lea, R. B., Rapp, D. N., Elfenbein, A., Mitchel, A. D., & Romine, R. S. (2008). Sweet Silent Thought Alliteration and Resonance in Poetry Comprehension. Psychological Science, 19(7), 709–716.
Liberman, M., & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic inquiry, 8(2), 249–336.
Menninghaus, W., Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Sounds funny? Humor effects of phonological and prosodic figures of speech. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 71.
Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., & Knoop, C. A. (2017). The emotional and aesthetic powers of parallelistic diction. Poetics (advanced online publication).
Obermeier, C., Menninghaus, W., von Koppenfels, M., Raettig, T., Schmidt-Kassow, M., Otterbein, S., & Kotz, S.A. (2013). Aesthetic and emotional effects of meter and rhyme in poetry. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 10.
Obermeier, C., Kotz, S. A., Jessen, S., Raettig, T., von Koppenfels, M., & Menninghaus, W. (2016). Aesthetic appreciation of poetry correlates with ease of processing in event-related potentials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(2), 362–373.
Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (1990). The use of rhythm in attending to speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 564.
Quintilian (1953). The Instituto oratoria of Quintilian. (H. E. Butler, Ed. and trans.) London: W. Heinemann/Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reichel, U. D. (2012). PermA and Balloon: Tools for String Alignment and Text Processing. In: Proceedings of Interspeech, Portland, OR, paper 346.
Reichel, U. D., & Kisler, T. (2014). Language-Independent Grapheme-Phoneme Conversion and Word Stress Assignment as a Web Service. In: R. Hoffmann (Ed.), Elektronische Sprachverarbeitung: Studientexte zur Sprachkommunikation 711, pp. 42–49. Dresden: TUDpress.
Russell, J.A. (1980). A Circumplex Model of Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178.
Schrott, R., & Jacobs, A. (2011). Gehirn und Gedicht. Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren. München: Carl Hanser.
Shields, J. L., McHugh, A., & Martin, J. G. (1974). Reaction time to phoneme targets as a function of rhythmic cues in continuous speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102(2), 250.
Tsur, R. (1992). What makes sound patterns expressive? The poetic mode of speech perception. Duke University Press.
Whissell, C. (2002). Emotion conveyed by sound in the poetry of Alfred, Lord Tennyson. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 20(2), 137–155.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Richter, Sandra, Toni Bernhart, Felix Dieterle, Gabriel Viehhauser, Gunilla Eschenbach, Jonas Kuhn, Nadja Schauffler, André Blessing, Markus Gärtner, Kerstin Jung, Nora Ketschig, Anna Kinder, Julia Koch, Thang Vu & Andreas Kozlik
Nikolsky, Aleksey
Postarnak, Svetlana, São Luís Castro & Susana Silva
2020. The role of linguistic prosody in the responses to recited poetry. Scientific Study of Literature 10:2 ► pp. 228 ff.
Blohm, Stefan, Valentin Wagner, Matthias Schlesewsky & Winfried Menninghaus
Bruhn, Mark J.
Jacobs, Arthur M.
2018. (Neuro-)Cognitive poetics and computational stylistics. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1 ► pp. 165 ff.
Blohm, Stefan, Winfried Menninghaus & Matthias Schlesewsky
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
