Cover not available

Article published In: Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 6:2 (2016) ► pp.176–207

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Reconceptualizing foregrounding

Identifying response strategies to deviation in absorbing narratives

 | University of Augsburg, Germany
 | Utrecht University, The Netherlands
 | The Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Germany
 | NHTV Breda University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands
 | University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Published online: 30 March 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.2.02bal
The experience of deviation is often referred to as foregrounding and contrasted with the experience of feeling absorbed in a narrative. However, instead of simply assuming that foregrounding and absorption are mutually exclusive, they should also be considered as co-occurring: being absorbed as a result of a deviating aspect of a story. In the present paper we examine the co-occurrence of responses by means of a data-driven qualitative approach. The analysis of interviews about absorbed experiences with written and cinematic fictional narratives focused on occurrences of and responses to perceived deviation. We identified seven strategies in response to deviation that may be described through three underlying dimensions: absorption, agency, and valence. Findings suggest that perceived deviation, rather than obstructing absorption, is associated with intense and meaningful engagement with narratives.
References (69)
Berlyne, D. E. (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in the fiction film. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P. (1996). The effects of formal training on literary perception. Poetics, 231, 471–487. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braun, I. K., & Cupchik, G. C. (2001). Phenomenological and quantitative analyses of absorption in literary passages. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19(1), 85–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brecht, B. (1976). Kleines organon fur das theater. Gesammelte werke (pp. 659–708). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 121, 321–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (1996). Inferring character from texts. Attribution theory and foregrounding theory. Poetics, 231, 335–361. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dissanayake, E. (1992). Homo aestheticus. Where art comes from and why. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., Twilley, L. C., & Leung, A. (1993). Literary processing and interpretation. Towards empirical foundations. Poetics, 22(1), 5–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erlich, V. (1969). Russian Formalism: History, doctrine. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fialho, O. (2007). Foregrounding and refamiliarization: Understanding readers’ response to literary texts. Language and Literature, 16(2), 105–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillham, B. (2005). Research interviewing: The range of techniques. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glazer, B. C., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of ground theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, M., Brock, T., & Kaufman, G. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakemulder, F., & van Peer, W. (2015). Empirical stylistics. In V. Sotirova (Ed.), A companion to stylistics (pp. 251–274). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakemulder, F., Fialho, O., Bal, M. (2016). What do we learn from literature? In Burke, M., Zyngier, S., & Fiahlo, O. (Eds.), Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments, Amsterdam: Benjamins. 19–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakemulder, J. (2004). Foregrounding and its effects on readers’ perception. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 193–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Tracing foregrounding in responses to film. Language and Literature, 161, 125–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoorn, J. (1997). Electronical evidence for the anomaly theory of metaphor processing. A brief introduction. In S. Tötösy de Zepetnek, and I. Sywensky (Eds), The Systematic and empirical approach to literature and culture as theory and application (pp. 67–74). Edmonton: University of Alberta.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iser, W. (1970). Die Appelstruktur der texte. Unbestimmtheit als wirkungsbedingung literarischer prosa. (The appel structure of texts. Undeterminedness as condition for the effect of literary prose). Konstanz: UniversitätsverlagGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1980). Interaction between text and reader. In S. R. Suleiman & I. Crosman (Eds.), The reader in the text (pp. 106–119). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. & Lüdtke, J. (in prep). Immersion into narrative and poetic worlds: A neurocognitive poetics perspective. In Hakemulder, F., Kuijpers, M., Balint, K., Tan, E., Doicaru, M. Handbook of Narrative Absorption. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Jacobs, A.M. (2011). Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells des literarischen Lesens (Neurocognitive poetics: elements of a model of literary reading). In: Schrott, R., Jacobs, A.M (Eds). Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (Brain and Poem: How we construct realities) (pp. 492–524). München: Carl Hanser Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T.A. (Ed.) Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kätsyri, J., Kinnunen, T., Kusumoto, K., Oittinen, P., & Ravaja, N. (2016). Negativity bias in media multitasking: The effects of negative social media messages on attention to television news broadcasts. Plos One, 11(5) Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
King, S. (2010). On writing. A memoir of the craft. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kneepkens, E., & Zwaan, R. (1994). Emotions and literary text comprehension. Poetics, 231, 125–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koopman, E. & Hakemulder, F. (2015). Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9(11): 79–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuijpers, M. & Hakemulder, F. (in prep). The nature of emergent literary effect. Depth of understanding in reading literature.
Kuijpers, M. M. (2014). Absorbing stories: The effects of textual devices on absorption and evaluative responses. (Unpublished PhD Disseration). Utrecht University,Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S., & Sikora, S. (2004). Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today, 25(2), 171–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuiken, D., Phillips, L., Gregus, M., Miall, D., Verbitsky, M. & Anna Tonkonogy, A. (2004): Locating self-modifying feelings within literary reading, Discourse Processes, 38 (2), 267–286. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 141, 27–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G., & Short, M. (1981). Style in fiction. A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levine, L. (1990). Highbrow/ Lowbrow. The emergence of cultural hierarchy in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miall, D. S. (1995). Anticipation and feeling in literary response: A neuropsychological perspective. Poetics, 23(4), 275–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect. response to literary stories. Poetics, 22(5), 389–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miall, D.S., Kuiken,D. (1995). Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29(1), 137–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mukařovský, J. (1964). Standard language and poetic language. In P.L. Garvin (Ed.), A Prague school reader on esthetics, literary structure, and style (pp. 17–30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oliver, M. B., & Raney, A. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful. differentiating hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61.5, 984–1004. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Osgood, C., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Payne, S. (2007). Grounded theory. In E. Lyons, & A. Coyle (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology. (pp. 65–86). London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art. A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6–7), 15–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rimmon-Kenan, S. (1983). Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics. London: Methuen. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanford, A. J., & Emmott, C. (2012). Mind, brain, and narrative. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanford, A. J., Sanford, A. J., Molle, J., & Emmott, C. (2006). Shallow processing and attention capture in written and spoken discourse. Discourse Processes, 42(2), 109–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schrott, R., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren. (Brain and Poem: How we construct realities). München: Hanser.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shklovsky, V. (1965). Art as technique. In L. T. Lemon, & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp. 3–24). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slater, M., & Wilbur, S. (1997). A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments, 6(6), 603–616. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, E.A. (2012). Pulp sensations. In D. Glover & S. McCraken (Eds). The Cambridge companion to popular fiction (pp. 141–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (2009) The philosophy of style. Auckland: The Floating Press. (orig. 1852).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tan, E. S. (1996). Emotion and the structure of narrative film. Film as an emotion machine. Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Twain, M. (2014). Fenimore Cooper’s literary offences. Auckland: The Floating Press. (orig. 1895).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tynyanov, Y. (1978). On literary evolution. In L. Matejka, & K. Pomorska (Eds.), Readings in Russian poetics. Formalist and Structuralist views. (pp. 66–78). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and psychology. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Peer, W., & Hakemulder, J. (2006). Foregrounding. In K. Brown (Ed.), The Pergamon encyclopaedia of language and linguistics (pp. 546–551). Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Peer, W., Hakemulder, J., Zyngier, S. (2007). Lines on feeling: Foregrounding, aesthetic appreciation, and meaning. Language and Literature, 16 (2), 197–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wirth, W., Hover, M., & Schramm, H. (2012). Beyond pleasure: Exploring the eudaimonic entertainment experience. Human Communication Research, 38(4), 406–428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wundt, W. Grundriss der psychologie (Outlines of psychology). Leibzig: Entgelmann.
Zyngier, S., Hakemulder, J., & van Peer, W. (2007). Complexity and foregrounding. in the eye of the beholder? Poetics Today, 28(4), 653–682. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (25)

Cited by 25 other publications

Bonasera, Carmen
2025. Does Literariness Influence Negative Empathy? A Study on the Effects of Foregrounding on Readers’ Affective and Aesthetic Reactions. Scientific Study of Literature 14:1 ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Bonasera, Carmen & Piergiorgio Trevisan
2025. Neurodivergence, foregrounding, and narrative empathy: A study on readers’ responses to textual manipulation. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics DOI logo
Schwerin, Julia, Jan Lenhart & Tobias Richter
2025. Short-Term Effects of Fiction on Social-Cognitive Skills: The Roles of Literariness, Language Familiarity, and Narrative Experience. Scientific Study of Literature 14:1 ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo
Kreitler, Melanie
2024. Easy, hard, radical empathy: narrating dementia in film. European Journal of English Studies 28:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Kuijpers, Moniek M., Massimo Lusetti, Piroska Lendvai & Simone Rebora
2024. Validation of the Story World Absorption Scale through annotation of online book reviews. Journal of Cultural Analytics 9:1 DOI logo
Kuijpers, Moniek, Piroska Lendvai, Massimo Lusetti, Simone Rebora, Lina Ruh, Jonathan Tadres, Tina Ternes & Johanna Vogelsanger
2023. Absorption in Online Reviews of Books: Presenting the English-Language AbsORB Metadata Corpus and Annotation Guidelines. Journal of Open Humanities Data 9 DOI logo
Scapin, Giulia, Cristina Loi, Frank Hakemulder, Katalin Bálint & Elly Konijn
2023. The role of processing foregrounding in empathic reactions in literary reading. Discourse Processes 60:4-5 ► pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
van de Ven, Inge
2023. ‘Gonna get you, baby!’ A qualitative-empirical study of attentional modulation in reading a short story. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 32:4 ► pp. 458 ff. DOI logo
van de Ven, Inge
2024. Attentional modulation in literary reading: A theoretical‐empirical framework. Orbis Litterarum 79:2 ► pp. 184 ff. DOI logo
van de Ven, Inge, Frank Hakemulder & Anne Mangen
2023. ‘TL;DR’ (Too Long; Didn’t Read)? Cognitive Patience as a Mode of Reading: Exploring Concentration and Perseverance. Scientific Study of Literature 12:1 ► pp. 68 ff. DOI logo
Eekhof, Lynn S., Kobie van Krieken & Roel M. Willems
2022. Reading about minds: The social-cognitive potential of narratives. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 29:5 ► pp. 1703 ff. DOI logo
Kuzmičová, Anežka, Markéta Supa, Jana Segi Lukavská & Filip Novák
2022. Exploring children's embodied story experiences: a toolkit for research and practice. Literacy 56:4 ► pp. 288 ff. DOI logo
Mitchell, Alex
2022. Game Mechanics as Narrative Mode. In The Authoring Problem [Human–Computer Interaction Series, ], ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Sopcak, Paul & Don Kuiken
2022. The affective allure – a phenomenological dialogue with David Miall’s studies of foregrounding and feeling. Journal of Literary Semantics 51:2 ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Eekhof, Lynn S., Moniek M. Kuijpers, Myrthe Faber, Xin Gao, Marloes Mak, Emiel van den Hoven & Roel M. Willems
2021. Lost in a Story, Detached from the Words. Discourse Processes 58:7 ► pp. 595 ff. DOI logo
Kukkonen, Karin
2021. Reading, Fast and Slow. Poetics Today 42:2 ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Vogrinčič Čepič, Ana & Marina Kotrla Topić
2021. ‘If you read at home, it's more relaxed, there are no limits’: Insights into domestic reading practices of Croatian and Slovenian university students. Literacy 55:3 ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Odağ, Özen & Margrit Schreier
2020. Qualitative Medienpsychologie. In Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie [Springer Reference Psychologie, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Odağ, Özen & Margrit Schreier
2020. Qualitative Medienpsychologie. In Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie, ► pp. 461 ff. DOI logo
Fialho, Olivia & Anezka Kuzmicova
2019. What is literature for? The role of transformative reading. Cogent Arts & Humanities 6:1 ► pp. 1692532 ff. DOI logo
Gibbs, Raymond W. & Herbert L. Colston
2019. What psycholinguistic studies ignore about literary experience. Scientific Study of Literature 9:1 ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Bruhn, Mark J.
2018. Citation analysis. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Consoli, Gianluca
2018. Preliminary steps towards a cognitive theory of fiction and its effects. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 2:1-2 ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Kuijpers, Moniek M. & Frank Hakemulder
2018. Understanding and Appreciating Literary Texts Through Rereading. Discourse Processes 55:7 ► pp. 619 ff. DOI logo
Kuijpers, Moniek M., Frank Hakemulder, Katalin Balint, Miruna Doicaru & Ed Tan
2017. Towards a new understanding of absorbing reading experiences. In Narrative Absorption [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 27], ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue