Article published In: Transdisciplinary Approaches to Literature and Empathy
Edited by Paul Sopčák, Massimo Salgaro and J. Berenike Herrmann
[Scientific Study of Literature 6:1] 2016
► pp. 59–86
The role of empathy in the knowledge building of eighth grade girls as they reflect on their experiences with literature
Published online: 21 December 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.1.05smi
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.1.05smi
This study focused on the role that empathy played in the knowledge building of 7 eighth grade readers. Participants met for twenty sessions over the course of a school year to reflect on their experiences empathizing with characters in their favorite works of literature. These reflections led to the generation of social themes. The girls worked to advance these themes by extending, contesting, and evaluating ideas presented.
In this community, the girls’ attempts to empathize with characters were foundational for analyzing actions and intentions of people. Empathy was also used as a tool in their talk as the girls imagined perspectives very different from their own. This resulted in new self knowledge because hearing different perspectives led them to expand their thinking. Results suggest a role for the sociocognitive benefits of engaging in literature and developing students’ capacity for empathy in Language Arts instruction.
Keywords: knowledge building, discussion, collaboration, perspective, literature, empathy
References (40)
Almasi, J. F., & Gambrell, L. B. (1994). Sociocognitive Conflict in Peer-Led and Teacher-Led Discussions of Literature. Reading Research Report No. 12. Retrieved from [URL]
Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., McNurlen, B., Archodidou, A., Kim, S., Reznitskaya, A., … Gilbert, L. (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition & Instruction, 19(1), 1–46.
Bal, M. P., & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. POS ONE.
Bereiter, C. (2002a). Design research for sustained innovation. Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 9(3), 321–327.
Clark, A.-M., Anderson, R. C., Kuo, L., Kim, I.-H., Archodidou, A., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2003). Collaborative reasoning: Expanding ways for children to talk and think in school. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 181.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
Coplan, A. (2004). Empathic engagement with narrative fictions. Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism, 62(2), 141–152.
Dong, T., Anderson, R. C., Kim, I. H., & Li, Y. (2008). Collaborative reasoning in China and Korea. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(4), 400–424.
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M. C. (2013). Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 28–47.
Evans, K. S. (2002). Fifth-grade students’ perceptions of how they experience literature discussion groups. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(1), 46.
Evans, K. S., Anders, P. L., & Alvermann, D. E. (1998). Literature discussion groups: An examination of gender roles. Reading Research & Instruction, 371, 107–122.
Ivey, G., & Johnston, P. H. (2013). Engagement with young adult literature: Outcomes and processes. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3), 255–275.
Johnson, D.R. (2012). Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150–155.
(2013). Transportation into literary fiction reduces prejudice against and increases empathy for Arab-Muslims. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 77–92.
Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K. (2012, March 26). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication.
Lysaker, J. T. (2006). Young children’s reading of wordless picture books: What’s self got to do with it? Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 6(1), 35–55.
Lysaker, J. T., & Miller, A. (2013). Engaging social imagination: The developmental work of wordless book reading. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 13(2), 147–174.
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694–712.
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34(4), 407–428.
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the Development of Children’s Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
Nachowitz, M. (2012). Reading for deep understanding: Knowledge building and conceptual artifacts in secondary English (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from State University of New York at Albany, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. (Accession No. 3517110).
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010) Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science and Technical subject. Washington, DC: Authors
Oatley, K. (1999). Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology, 3(2), 101–117.
Park, J. (2012). Re-imaging reader-response in middle and secondary schools: Early adolescent girls’ critical and communal reader responses to the young adult novel Speak. Children’s Literature in Education, 43(3), 191–212.
Polleck, J. N. (2011). Using book clubs to enhance social – emotional and academic learning with urban adolescent females of color. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 27(1–2), 101–128.
Reninger, K. B., & Rehark, L. (2009). Discussions in a fourth-grade classroom: Using exploratory talk to promote children’s dialogic identities. Language Arts, 86(4), 268.
Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L.-J., Clark, A.-M., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: a dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 29–48.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1982). The literary transaction: Evocation and response. Theory into Practice, 21(4), 268–277.
Sandoval, W. (2014). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 18–36.
Scardamalia. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith & Henderson (Eds.), Liberal Education in a Knowledge Society (pp. 67–118). Chicago, IL: [Berkeley, CA.]: Open Court ; Distributed by Publishers Group West.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97–115). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Smit, J. (2015) Eighth grade girls’ knowledge building with narrative texts (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation and Thesis (UMI no. 3704067).
Smith, S., A. (2000). Talking about “real stuff”: Explorations of agency and romance in an all-girls’ book club. Language Arts, 78(1), 30–38.
Strommen, L.T., & Mates, B.F. (2004). Learning to love reading: Interviews with older children and teens. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(3), 188–200.
The Design Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2), 117–145.