Article published In: Scientific Study of Literature
Vol. 5:2 (2015) ► pp.183–199
Beauty judgements of non-professional poetry
Regression analyses of authorial attribution, emotional response and perceived writing quality
Published online: 28 July 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.5.2.04han
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.5.2.04han
The process of reading and writing poetry is increasingly conducted by non-professionals. The current study utilized a series of regression models to explore the mechanism through which beauty judgements of non-professional poetry are made. The analysis addressed the relationships among the decision that a poem was written by a published poet (authorial attribution), a perception of the quality of the writing, the emotional response to the poem and a beauty judgement of the poem. 54 participants from two graduate applied linguistics programs rated 5 non-professional poems for their beauty, emotive response, quality of writing and semi-professional status of the writer. Analyses were conducted on averaged ratings across all five poems. The results indicate the beauty judgements, emotive response and quality of writing judgements were closely related. The decision that a poem is written by a published poet predicted the quality of writing and emotional response to the poem. An inconsistent mediation model was determined, in which increases in the semi-professional status of the writer increased the self-reported emotive response and quality of writing which in turn increased the beauty judgement of the poem. The results suggest a mechanism by which convergence of aesthetic judgement with novice reviewers is directed by the social sanctioning of the authority and quality of the writer.
Keywords: poetry, aesthetic judgments, creative writing
References (17)
Blythe, H., & Sweet, C. (2008). The writing community: A new model for the creative writing classroom. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition and Culture, 81, 305–325.
Bohrn, I.C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A.M. (2013). When we like what we know - A paramertic fMRI analysis of beauty and familiarity. Brain and Language, 1241, 1–8.
Broad, B., & Theune, M. (2010). How we value comtemporary poetry: An empirical inquiry. College English, 73(2), 113–137.
Donnelly, D., & Harper, G. (2013). Introduction: Key issues and global perspectives in creative writing. In D. Donnelly & G. Harper (Eds.), Key issues in creative writing (pp. xiii–xxxi). Bristol, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.
Gatti, A. (2011). Hume’s taste for standards: Experience and aestehtic judgment reconsidered. Castelli di Yale, XI(11), 134–143.
Hanauer, D.I. (2010). Poetry as research: Exploring second language poetry writing. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Healey, S. (2013). Beyond the literary: Why creative literacy matters. In D. Donnelly & G. Harper (Eds.), Key issues in creative writing (pp. 61–78). Bristol, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.
Leahy, A. (2012). Undergraduate creative writing in the United States: Buying in isn’t selling out. In H. Beck (Ed.), Teaching creative writing (pp. 73–79). Houndmills, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
MacKinnon, D.P., Fairchild, A.J., & Fritz, M.S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 581, 583–615.
MacKinnon, D., Lockwood, C.M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resamplin methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 301, 99–128.
Obermeier, C., Menninghaus, W., von Koppenfels, M., Raettig, T., Schmidt-Kassow, M., Otterbein, S., & Kotz, S. (2013). Aesthetic and emotional effects of meter and rhyme in poetry. Frontiers in Psychology, 41, 1–10.
Preacher, K., & Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 361, 717–731.
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382.
van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and psychology: Investiagtions of foregrounding. London, United Kingdomk: Croom Helm.
. (2008). The quality of literature: Linguistic studies in literary evaluation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Nicholes, Justin
De la Torre Sánchez, Ángel
Postarnak, Svetlana, São Luís Castro & Susana Silva
2020. The role of linguistic prosody in the responses to recited poetry. Scientific Study of Literature 10:2 ► pp. 228 ff.
Nenadić, Filip, Dušan Vejnović & Slobodan Marković
Jacobs, Arthur M.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.